Reduce the number of indentation levels in save_image().
---
suspend.c | 54 --
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
Index: suspend/suspend.c
===
--- suspend.orig/su
Rename the variable 'compress' to 'do_compress', in analogy with 'do_encrypt'.
---
suspend.c | 20 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Index: suspend/suspend.c
===
--- suspend.orig/suspend.c
Rearrange the code in init_swap_writer().
---
suspend.c | 24 ++--
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: suspend/suspend.c
===
--- suspend.orig/suspend.c 2007-08-16 15:39:58.0 +02
Rearrange the code in write_image().
---
suspend.c | 154 --
1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
Index: suspend/suspend.c
===
--- suspend.orig/suspend.c
Hi,
I have seven patches indented to make the code in suspend.c a bit more readable
(less levels of indentation, simpler loops etc.).
I haven't tested them yet, so if anyone has the time and motivation, please do
so. ;-)
Comments welcome.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the r
Reduce the number of indentation levels in suspend_system().
---
suspend.c | 70 ++
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
Index: suspend/suspend.c
===
--- sus
Reduce the number of indentation levels in generate_key().
---
suspend.c | 75 +-
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
Index: suspend/suspend.c
===
--- suspe
Don't allocate to much memory if do_encrypt is not set.
---
suspend.c | 20 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Index: suspend/suspend.c
===
--- suspend.orig/suspend.c 2007-08-16 14:14:44.00
Hi,
The appended patch makes s2disk and resume use LZO instead of LZF for
compression. The new code seems to be a bit faster than the old one, but this
may be my impression only.
If anyone can please test it on i386, I'd be grateful.
Greetings,
Rafael
---
Makefile |2 +-
resume.c | 25
On Thursday, 16 August 2007 05:53, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/15/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > You can malloc as much as you wish at initialization directly into
> > > the pointers... I just don't understand what may go wrong if you d
On Thursday, 16 August 2007 05:38, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/15/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday, 11 August 2007 21:08, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Current implementation does not cleanup c
On Saturday, 4 August 2007 14:35, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Saturday 04 August 2007, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> >
> > Hello Rafael,
> >
> > This is *UNTESTED* suggestion for switching into lzo without the memcpy.
> > Please see if I missed something as I the code combination of global
> > variables,
>
On Saturday, 4 August 2007 23:17, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This patch adds --splash argument to s2both, s2disk, resume.
> It is required especially for resume when you want to disable splash in
> initramfs
> as result of kernel parameter, even if it usually turned on on suspend.conf
>
On Wednesday, 15 August 2007 18:43, Luca wrote:
> On 8/15/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 15 August 2007 17:20, Couriousous wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > Le mercredi 15 août 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit:
> > >
On Saturday, 4 August 2007 14:51, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> This allows you to specify an array of config_par, ending it with NULL
> name, so that you don't have to calculate the number of entries manually.
I have applied the patch.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
On Tuesday, 31 July 2007 16:01, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > # Running in *copy* of this code, somewhere in low 1MB.
> > > > >
> > > > > - movb$0xa1, %al ; outb %al, $0x80
> > > >
> > > > Well, what was this for?
> > >
> > > Debugging leds on port 80. I still have that
On Sunday, 5 August 2007 19:48, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > 1. Move main() out of s2ram.c into s2ram-main.c, this will enable s2ram.o
> > > to be included
> > > in both s2ram and s2both without recompilation.
> > >
> > > 2. Split whitelist.c into whitelist.h/whitelist.c as including .c is
On Saturday, 4 August 2007 00:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 3 August 2007 18:36, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > On Friday 03 August 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, 3 August 2007 01:16, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > >
> > > > config.* con
On Saturday, 4 August 2007 00:14, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 3 August 2007 23:14, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > On Friday 03 August 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, 3 August 2007 01:15, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > >
> > > > enc
On Monday, 6 August 2007 13:42, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Monday 06 August 2007, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > On 8/6/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Second, what I didn't like is not the whole idea, but the context in
> > > which you
>
On Monday, 6 August 2007 11:23, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Monday 06 August 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> > > -#!/bin/bash
> > > +#!/bin/sh -x
> > >
> >
> > What is "sh -x"?
> >
>
> Good catch!
> I had some issues with this script... -x allows debugging...
> Here is an update
On Monday, 6 August 2007 13:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 6 August 2007 13:00, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > On 8/6/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Yes, in this context you're right, but this was not clear from the
> > > original
On Wednesday, 15 August 2007 17:20, Couriousous wrote:
> Hello
>
> Le mercredi 15 août 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:32, Couriousous wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > Here is an easy way to speed
On Wednesday, 8 August 2007 21:30, Tim Dijkstra wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 01:50:12 +0300
> "Alon Bar-Lev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > The question is: Why cannot I switch from one vt to another during image
> > write?
> > I guess some lock out somewhere at freeze something...
> > I will
Hi,
On Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:32, Couriousous wrote:
> Hello
>
> Here is an easy way to speed up the image writing. It simply tell the kernel
> to
> immediatly start writing the data to disk asynchronously and not to do the
> traditional
> buffering.
>
> Mesurement:
> System: pentium D8
On Saturday, 11 August 2007 21:08, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Current implementation does not cleanup console settings if abort was
> selected by user.
> This should fix it.
I prefer the appended patch.
Greetings,
Rafael
---
suspend.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index:
On Tuesday, 14 August 2007 17:43, Ilian wrote:
> This machine can be identified by:
> sys_vendor = "Sony Corporation"
> sys_product = "VGN-SZ340P"
> sys_version = "R5283566"
> bios_version = "R0096N0"
>
> This machiene is not in the whitelist. Suspend to RAM works - kind of.
>
On Thursday, 9 August 2007 00:28, Felix Homann wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> now we're getting closer:
>
> With "echo test > /sys/power/disk" it's just the same, but with "echo
> shutdown > ..." the kernel will panic. The very last lines read like this:
>
> EIP: [ lapic_nmi_suspend+0x1d/0x30 ss:ESP 006
On Wednesday, 8 August 2007 22:40, Felix Homann wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> >> Does this tell you something?
> >
> > Well, only that CONFIG_DISABLE_CONSOLE_SUSPEND is probably unset ...
>
>
> As stated before, I could not set it in 'make x
On Wednesday, 8 August 2007 22:27, Felix Homann wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 8 August 2007 21:17, Felix wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't think this is of any help, though...
> >
> > Yes, it is.
> >
> > At least we know
On Wednesday, 8 August 2007 21:17, Felix wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Can you please do the following:
> >
> > * compile the kernel with CONFIG_DISABLE_CONSOLE_SUSPEND=y
> > and the appended patch applied
> > * boot the kernel with init=/
On Tuesday, 7 August 2007 22:42, Felix wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 7 August 2007 22:24, Felix wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hmm, boxes with similar hardware configurations usually suspend with no
> > problems.
> >
> > May I see your .confi
On Tuesday, 7 August 2007 22:24, Felix wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Can you please post the output of 'lspci -v'?
>
> It's in the attachement.
Hmm, boxes with similar hardware configurations usually suspend with no
problems.
May I see yo
On Tuesday, 7 August 2007 21:59, Felix Homann wrote:
> On Monday 06 August 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, 6 August 2007 20:22, Felix Homann Hi wrote:
> > > > Please try 2.6.23-rc2, when it's out, in the minimal configuration (ie.
> &
On Tuesday, 7 August 2007 16:03, Romano Giannetti wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 21:40 +0200, Romano Giannetti wrote:
>
> [basically, s2ram no working for me and ususpend ubuntu package busted]
>
> Well, I found a little error on ususpend 0.5 which stopped me to compile
> s2ram: in Makefile, you
On Monday, 6 August 2007 18:40, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, 6 August 2007 02:36, Jeff Chua wrote:
> >> On 8/6/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> What does 's2ram -i' say abo
On Monday, 6 August 2007 20:22, Felix Homann Hi wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Friday, 27 Jul 2007 01:33:02 -0700, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote
>
> > On Friday, 27 July 2007 10:15, Felix Homann wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> with recent kernels I'm having s
On Monday, 6 August 2007 13:10, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/6/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you got radeontool from us, it is GPLed. You can get zlib-licensed
> > version from Frederick.
>
> So please update the header of the file into dual license.
>
> Now (if you wish) we ca
On Monday, 6 August 2007 13:00, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/6/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, in this context you're right, but this was not clear from the original
> > post.
> >
> > Moreover, the printf() is buggy, not th
On Monday, 6 August 2007 02:36, Jeff Chua wrote:
> On 8/6/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What does 's2ram -i' say about your machine?
>
> This machine can be identified by:
> sys_vendor = "LENOVO"
> sys_produc
On Monday, 6 August 2007 10:18, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/6/07, Frank Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 06 August 2007 00:46:01 Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > On 8/6/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Monda
On Monday, 6 August 2007 00:05, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> Well... It never worked :)
Why exactly do you think so?
> This what happens on shortcuts...
> Why calling this inside printf context instead of making this own statement?
>
> ---
>
> --- suspend.org/resume.c 2007-05-13 20:53:13.0
On Sunday, 5 August 2007 15:26, Jeff Chua wrote:
> On 8/5/07, Antonino A. Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Can you try with the boot option acpi_sleep=s3_bios,s3_mode
> > OR
> > if using s2ram, use s2ram -f a3
>
> Tried both, text-console still not restored.
>
> In fact, with "s2ram -f a3
On Saturday, 4 August 2007 09:34, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/4/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > We can always complete this in future.
> > > Also if you apply the suggested fix, you can add more info later,
> > > there is nothin
On Friday, 3 August 2007 18:36, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Friday 03 August 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, 3 August 2007 01:16, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > >
> > > config.* conflicts with autoconf files.
> > > Rename the to configparser.*.
> &g
On Saturday, 4 August 2007 00:46, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/4/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hmm... You can help you know...
> >
> > Perhaps I'm doing something else, which I consider as more important, in
> > parallel?
>
> W
On Saturday, 4 August 2007 00:03, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/4/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > OK.
> > > Do you wish to sync up compress->do_compress as well?
> >
> > No. I'd like to have a patch without this "compr
On Friday, 3 August 2007 23:59, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/4/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I am for removing it and fix it right when someone have an issue with it.
> >
> > What exactly is wrong with it?
>
> Turning on GNU extensions
On Friday, 3 August 2007 23:58, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/4/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Usually, only the package full license is shown here.
> > > For dependencies only short copyright signature is displayed.
> > > Do you wish to put
On Friday, 3 August 2007 23:14, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Friday 03 August 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, 3 August 2007 01:15, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > >
> > > encrypt variable conflict with glibc::encrypt()
> > > Rename it to encrypt_on
>
On Friday, 3 August 2007 18:23, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/3/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday, 3 August 2007 01:15, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > >
> > > encrypt variable conflict with glibc::encrypt()
> > > Rename it to encrypt
On Friday, 3 August 2007 18:22, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/3/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please dig in the list archives. I don't remember at the moment, but it's
> > needed for something important.
> >
> > Alternati
On Friday, 3 August 2007 18:27, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/3/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > +vbetool License
> > > +
> > > + Copyright Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, heavily based on
> > > + vbetest.c fr
On Friday, 3 August 2007 01:18, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> 1. Move main() out of s2ram.c into s2ram-main.c, this will enable s2ram.o to
> be included
> in both s2ram and s2both without recompilation.
>
> 2. Split whitelist.c into whitelist.h/whitelist.c as including .c is none
> standard/unsupport
On Friday, 3 August 2007 01:16, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> config.* conflicts with autoconf files.
> Rename the to configparser.*.
>
> After applying this patch, you should rename:
> config.h->configparser.h
> config.c->configparser.c
OK
> I did not want to include the removal/addition in patch.
On Friday, 3 August 2007 01:15, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> encrypt variable conflict with glibc::encrypt()
> Rename it to encrypt_on
I'd prefer do_encrypt.
> ---
>
> diff -urNp suspend.org/suspend.c suspend-0.6_beta1/suspend.c
> --- suspend.org/suspend.c 2007-07-29 21:30:27.0 +0300
> +
On Friday, 3 August 2007 10:14, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/3/07, Frank Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Friday 03 August 2007 01:13:56 Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > Can anyone please explain this usage?
> > > These flags should seldom be used.
> > Why do you think so? _GNU_SOURCE ac
On Friday, 3 August 2007 01:12, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> Use sh and not bash.
> Support BOOT_DIR for install-resume.sh
Looks OK, I'm going to apply it.
> ---
>
> diff -urNp suspend.org/scripts/create-resume-initrd.sh
> suspend-0.6_beta1/scripts/create-resume-initrd.sh
> --- suspend.org/scripts/
3 00:36:13.0 +0300
> @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
> +
> +suspend License
> +
> + Copyright (C) 2005-2007 Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> + Copyright (C) 2006-2007 Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> + Copyright (C) 2006-2007 Stefan Seyfrie
On Friday, 3 August 2007 01:24, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/3/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please look at the code in prepare(), for example. In there,
> > lzf_compress() is
> > used to take page_size bytes of data from buf, compress them and pla
On Friday, 3 August 2007 10:55, Warren Crossing wrote:
> I mapped the sleep key to s2ram with xbindkeys.
> It suspends, then the power button flashes, then it comes out of sleep,
> clicks the hdisk and sometimes blinks the last picture on the screen,
> and then "goes back to sleep" it does this u
On Friday, 3 August 2007 00:54, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 8/3/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > First, please just replace LZF with LZO. If LZF is unsupported, there's no
> > reason to drag it all the way.
>
> OK.
>
> > Second, you hav
On Friday, 3 August 2007 00:31, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 July 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > IIRC noone was strongly against, so replacing lzf with lzo is the way
> > > to go...?
> >
> > Ultimately, I think it is.
>
> Rafael,
> Can you p
On Tuesday, 31 July 2007 20:30, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > Right... so do you have sourceforge login? I guess we could use you as
> > > a webmaster for suspend.sf.net project ;-).
> >
> > My sf login is alonbl.
> > But I am far from being a web master... Or have the time to do this.
> > Bu
On Tuesday, 31 July 2007 16:43, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 04:01:40PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > > > # Running in *copy* of this code, somewhere in low 1MB.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - movb$0xa1, %al ; outb %al, $0x80
> > > > >
> > > > > Well
Hi,
On Tuesday, 31 July 2007 15:18, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > This removes some stale debugging infrastructure from s2ram
> > > paths. Also, there's no need to verify_cpu on x86-64 -- cpu can't
> > > change during s2ram, and removed #if 0-ed code. Some testing would be
> > > useful, perpa
Hi,
On Tuesday, 31 July 2007 14:12, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This removes some stale debugging infrastructure from s2ram
> paths. Also, there's no need to verify_cpu on x86-64 -- cpu can't
> change during s2ram, and removed #if 0-ed code. Some testing would be
> useful, perpahs it will even
On Monday, 30 July 2007 08:56, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:45:41PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, 27 July 2007 18:33, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 05:18:45PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> >
On Sunday, 29 July 2007 21:41, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 7/29/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday, 29 July 2007 21:17, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > On 7/29/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > &g
On Sunday, 29 July 2007 21:17, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 7/29/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Which version of pciutils do you have?
> >
> > pciutils-2.2.4-13
>
> OK.
> pkg-config stuff was introduced in pciutils-2.2.6
>
> I w
On Sunday, 29 July 2007 20:01, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 7/29/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It doesn't work on my system (openSUSE 10.2).
>
> What do you get?
s2ram-x86.o: In function `s2ram_resume':
s2ram-x86.c:(.text+0x31e): undefined refer
On Sunday, 29 July 2007 02:44, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 09:23:07PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, 19 July 2007 05:20, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > >
> > > Please consider the following patch.
> > > So you can add new files
On Saturday, 28 July 2007 20:14, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, 28 July 2007 11:51, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > On Friday 27 July 2007, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > On Friday 27 July 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > Apart from this you should also clear th
On Saturday, 28 July 2007 20:02, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday, 28 July 2007 11:52, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Just a minor issue, I know you should never reach there...
> > But never consume 100% CPU.
>
On Thursday, 19 July 2007 05:13, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > AFAICS, recent versions of pciutils depend on it.
>
> Oh...
> You don't have to compile it with zlib...
>
> """The configure script will a
On Saturday, 28 July 2007 20:06, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 7/28/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, I think that the majority of core developers of the suspend package do
> > not know autoconf/automake very well, including me. That may be a problem
>
On Saturday, 28 July 2007 11:51, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Friday 27 July 2007, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > On Friday 27 July 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Apart from this you should also clear the PLATFORM_SUSPEND flag in the
> > > image
> > > header. O
On Friday, 27 July 2007 22:28, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Friday 27 July 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Well, in fact we're missing someone to take care of the project's web page,
> > too.
>
> Hmmm... I cannot help you with web stuff... :(
> But I can help you
Hi,
On Saturday, 28 July 2007 11:52, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Just a minor issue, I know you should never reach there...
> But never consume 100% CPU.
Thanks, I'm going to apply it.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
On Monday, 23 July 2007 11:16, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > AFAICS, recent versions of pciutils depend on it.
> >
> > Oh...
> > You don't have to compile it with zlib...
> >
> > """The configure script will automatically enable support for a compressed
> > pci.ids if you have zlib installed
On Thursday, 19 July 2007 05:20, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 July 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 18 July 2007 20:01, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I wounder why resume default location is at /usr/local/lib/susp
Hi,
On Friday, 20 July 2007 19:56, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> Hello Rafael,
>
> Yet another patch in the suspend2 feature-set series.
> It sets cpufreq to maximum during the cycle.
> It is important to finish the process as quickly as possible (human engineer
> issue :) )
> When running on batteri
Hi,
On Friday, 20 July 2007 17:54, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This patch enables the user to press "r" during snapshot writing,
> in order to reboot and not shutdown.
>
> One more step toward suspend2 functionality... :)
>
> Best Regards,
> Alon Bar-Lev.
>
> diff -urNp suspend.org/spl
On Friday, 27 July 2007 19:34, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > But i am not the one to decide this, as i am only maintaining a small
> > > piece
> > > of the code (mainly the whitelist).
> >
> > Why do you forward people to suse URLs on whitelist?
>
> Because it was easier that way :-).
>
>
On Friday, 27 July 2007 18:33, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 05:18:45PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > > (yes, i think i know what it does; writing 1 into the state of the
> > > framebuffer device just disables any drawing - and thus any acce
Hi,
On Friday, 27 July 2007 15:27, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while working on https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293662 and
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281798 it occured to me that
> including Ubuntu's hack in s2ram might be a good idea.
> It should do no harm -
On Friday, 27 July 2007 10:15, Felix Homann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with recent kernels I'm having several problems suspending with
> s2disk/s2ram. The last kernel it has been working flawlessly was 2.6.18.1:
>
> First, here's what the working kernel says:
>
> 2.6.18.1:
>
> s2disk:
>
Hi,
On Tuesday, 24 July 2007 19:51, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was afraid to ask this question...
>
> But given the options, dependencies and system configuration, it would
> be simpler (to users) an autoconf/automake build environment.
>
> If you don't have any religion thing against t
On Monday, 23 July 2007 22:34, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 7/23/07, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ... and there are two versions of lzo 8-) Which to support? We (at PLD)
> > "like"
> > 2.x for example.
>
> My patch is for lzo1x_1 it is available in llzo-1 and lzo-2.
> I checked
On Monday, 23 July 2007 22:04, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2007-07-23 20:12:21, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > On 7/23/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >I guess it is easiest way for gentoo, but... I'd prefer not to switch
> > >compression algorithms too often, unless there's good reason t
On Monday, 23 July 2007 19:10, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On 7/23/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > We do ACPI calls ("platform mode"), and they manipulate LED status for
> > us. We probably tell plaform to unsuspend at the end of snapshot.
That's correct.
> Will you fix this?
Well, I'd
Hi,
On Friday, 20 July 2007 19:56, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> Hello Rafael,
Thanks for all of the patches so far. :-)
> Yet another patch in the suspend2 feature-set series.
> It sets cpufreq to maximum during the cycle.
> It is important to finish the process as quickly as possible (human engine
Hi,
On Wednesday, 18 July 2007 19:25, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Hello, Rafael
>
> I am the maintainer of gentoo hibernate-script, tuxonice (suspend2).
> I wish to add uswsup/suspend into portage.
>
> We do not currently maintain liblzf, as it seems upstream is not cooperative.
> I've created a patch
On Wednesday, 18 July 2007 19:28, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wounder why the libz dependency is required, I did not
> see any reference to this library in the source.
>
> Do I miss something?
>
> It compiles find if I remove it:
> -S2RAM_LD_FLAGS += -lx86 -lpci -lz
> +S2RAM_LD_FLAGS += -
On Wednesday, 18 July 2007 20:01, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wounder why resume default location is at /usr/local/lib/suspend
> and not at /usr/local/sbin...
>
> The resume is a program which is executed directly, right?
No, it's rather designed to be executed from an initrd/initramfs im
On Tuesday, 17 July 2007 22:39, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> Hi,
> I am proposing two changes to s2ram-x86.c:
> - first, if no "-a" is given, reset acpi_video_flags to 0, which will
> override also the boot options. The reason i want to do this is that
> people (me included) are sometimes confused
Hi,
On Friday, 13 July 2007 18:13, Benedikt Nimmervoll wrote:
> Hi!
> I am using the uswsusp 0.3 on my Kubuntu Feisty driven nx6325 laptop (fglrx
> driver) with the command "s2ram -f -p -s". I have changed from ndiswrapper to
> the most recent bcm43xx driver recently and have to un/reload the bc
On Wednesday, 4 July 2007 21:33, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > What about this? (Only compile tested, but looks pretty obvious to
> > > me). Something like this should get us rid of ugly option, and still
> > > solve debugging problems... Hmmm?
> > >
Hi,
On Saturday, 30 June 2007 09:45, David wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The suspend still doesn't work on my thinkpad X60. I'm currently using
> Ubuntu 7.04 fiesty. Can you please advice?
Where exactly does it fail?
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
---
On Thursday, 28 June 2007 19:25, Stefan Seyfried wrote:
> (CC'ing Linus, since disabling consoles during suspend was his idea IIRC)
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 05:34:54PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thursday, 28 June 2007 15:
1 - 100 of 555 matches
Mail list logo
