On 5/9/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 19:30, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> > Yes, something like that should do...
> > I'd prefer not to call ACPI functions from outside of drivers/acpi,
> > but this could be cleaned later.
>
> Actually, I was thinking of
On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 19:30, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> Yes, something like that should do...
> I'd prefer not to call ACPI functions from outside of drivers/acpi,
> but this could be cleaned later.
Actually, I was thinking of adding two operations to hibernation_ops() (now,
that we have it :
Yes, something like that should do...
I'd prefer not to call ACPI functions from outside of drivers/acpi,
but this could be cleaned later.
On 5/9/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 15:34, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> > we needed to call pm_prepare() on boot
On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 15:34, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> we needed to call pm_prepare() on boot kernel only to disable GPEs to
> resolve 7887. It will also blink the LEDs during the resume image
> load, but it's possible to live without it.
> If you drop call to pm_prepare(), we still need to d
we needed to call pm_prepare() on boot kernel only to disable GPEs to
resolve 7887. It will also blink the LEDs during the resume image
load, but it's possible to live without it.
If you drop call to pm_prepare(), we still need to disable GPEs, so
they will not fire during image switch. So if we di
On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 13:59, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> This patch will disable EC GPE, which seems to be major problem.
Could you please explain to me why you think so?
Greetings,
Rafael
-
This SF.net email is sponsore
On Wednesday, 9 May 2007 08:58, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> I expect http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7887 this bug to
> pop again with this patch.
Well, this change only reflects what's done in kernel/power/disk.c .
Greetings,
Rafael
--
This patch will disable EC GPE, which seems to be major problem.
Regards,
Alex
On 5/9/07, Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I expect http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7887 this bug to
pop again with this patch.
Regards,
Alex.
On 5/9/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTE
I expect http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7887 this bug to
pop again with this patch.
Regards,
Alex.
On 5/9/07, Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The restore part of the hibernation code should not call any 'platform'
> functi
