Hi Markus,
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 11:24:41PM +0100, Markus Meyer wrote:
> >It would be great if you could try out what works on both of your machines.
>
> Ok, meanwhile I don't need to use "-f" anylonger ;)
> s2ram alone and "s2ram -a3" work the same way here. My notebook happily
> goes to bed a
On [Tue, Jan 09 21:00], Stefan Seyfried wrote:
Hi guys,
Shalom Stefan,
i got two, somewhat conflicting reports from you about the same machine
(edited for brevity):
*lol*
s2ram -f -a3. Only prob is the sound which is reenabled after suspend.
So now the question is: is "-a 3" really neede
Hi guys,
i got two, somewhat conflicting reports from you about the same machine
(edited for brevity):
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:30:51AM +0100, Markus Meyer wrote:
> On [Mon, Dec 04 09:34], Stefan Seyfried wrote:
>
> Hi Stefan, cheers list,
>
> >>This machine can be identified by:
> >>sys_
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:16:13AM +0100, Markus Meyer wrote:
> On [Mon, Dec 18 09:01], Stefan Seyfried wrote:
>
> >Almost :-)
>
> *lol*
>
> >Do you just call "s2ram -f" or do you need any other options?
>
> ... just plain "s2ram -f". That's all.
Cool. Added to the whitelist now.
Thanks for t
On [Mon, Dec 18 09:01], Stefan Seyfried wrote:
Almost :-)
*lol*
Do you just call "s2ram -f" or do you need any other options?
... just plain "s2ram -f". That's all.
from the hibernate config it certainly does not look if you do, but i don't
know it enough to make sure :-)
That's becaus
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:30:51AM +0100, Markus Meyer wrote:
> On [Mon, Dec 04 09:34], Stefan Seyfried wrote:
>
> Hi Stefan, cheers list,
>
> >>This machine can be identified by:
> >>sys_vendor = "FUJITSU SIEMENS"
> >>sys_product = "Amilo Si 1520"
> >>sys_version = "Rev 1"
> >>
On [Mon, Dec 04 09:34], Stefan Seyfried wrote:
Hi Stefan, cheers list,
This machine can be identified by:
sys_vendor = "FUJITSU SIEMENS"
sys_product = "Amilo Si 1520"
sys_version = "Rev 1"
bios_version = " 1.09"
My kernel version is 2.6.18.
From X? From text mode? Fram
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 09:41:58AM +0100, Markus Meyer wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> at first, I'm not subscribed so please send any emails to my above
> address.
> I just wanted to report new hardware which is not in the database and
> works perfectly with uswsusp-0.3~cvs20060928-4 (Debian unstable
> pa
Hi!
> at first, I'm not subscribed so please send any emails to my above
> address.
> I just wanted to report new hardware which is not in the database and
> works perfectly with uswsusp-0.3~cvs20060928-4 (Debian unstable
> package). Here the infos which "s2ram -n" spits out:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/
Hi folks,
at first, I'm not subscribed so please send any emails to my above
address.
I just wanted to report new hardware which is not in the database and
works perfectly with uswsusp-0.3~cvs20060928-4 (Debian unstable
package). Here the infos which "s2ram -n" spits out:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/h
10 matches
Mail list logo
