Re: [sympy] subs() using dicts where some of the keys are also values

2011-07-20 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > First off, if you want an explicit order of substitution, you should > not use a dictionary.  Subs also allows the [(old, new), ...] syntax, > which lets you define a specific order. > > But even in this case, it will perform the substitution

Re: [sympy] Saving sympy expressions to disk

2011-07-15 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > This is a known issue.  Unfortunately, it seems the pickle does not > work for Function.  See > http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1198. > > Any ideas on how to fix this? I wonder how this works at live.sympy.org, because there th

Re: [sympy] Re: MathJax for the Sphinx docs

2011-07-15 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > I've made this easer for people who just want to play around with what > it looks like by pushing a demo up to docs.sympy.org. > > Go to http://docs.sympy.org/mathjax/ and navigate to a LaTeX intensive > page (the mpmath function pages are go

Re: [sympy] Re: Matrix Symbol

2011-07-15 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Andy Ray Terrel wrote: > My suggestion would be to continue with the matrixify solution and > write functions to fix up the expression tree as need be.  The whole > issue of making Add/Mul/Pow extensible is separate but the logic can > be transferred pretty easily.

[sympy] Re: GSoC midterm evaluations

2011-07-15 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > Hi, > > Just a reminder, that all GSoC students must submit the mentor > evaluations, do it today (i.e. now), if you haven't done so yet. > Please make sure you do it, and also ping your mentor to submit it as > wel

[sympy] GSoC midterm evaluations

2011-07-14 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, Just a reminder, that all GSoC students must submit the mentor evaluations, do it today (i.e. now), if you haven't done so yet. Please make sure you do it, and also ping your mentor to submit it as well. It is very important. Thanks, Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subsc

Re: [sympy] Tutorial at SciPy 2011 conference

2011-07-13 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > There will also be a video made available at some point.  Watch > http://conference.scipy.org/scipy2011/. How did it go? How many people attended? What are your impressions? Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: [sympy] Python wrapper for FLINT 2

2011-07-11 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Fredrik, On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Fredrik Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > I have created the beginning of an easy-to-use Python wrapper for > FLINT 2: http://fredrik-johansson.github.com/python-flint/ > > It currently provides numbers, (dense univariate) polynomials and > (dense) matrices ov

Re: [sympy] SymPy is on Google's Open Source Blog

2011-06-27 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > Google has included a snipped about SymPy in their open source blog as > part of a series of posts about new organizations for Google Summer of > Code.  See > http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2011/06/whos-new-in-google-summer-of-code-par

Re: [sympy] Problem with evaluating rotation operator

2011-06-24 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Brian, On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Brian Granger wrote: > I know this has already been merged, but I wanted to say that this as > well as the other PR that was merged look extremely good.  The test > coverage is fantastic and will give us a super-solid foundation to > build everything el

Re: [sympy] Problem with evaluating rotation operator

2011-06-22 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Sean Vig wrote: > Hi everyone, > I have currently implemented the improved Wigner d matrix method and > included tests for this, the Wigner D function and the rewrite and represent > functions which are improved in this pull request. If anyone could do any > final

Re: [sympy] Test failure in 0.7.0 pysics.quantum.matrixcache

2011-06-22 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > So far, I've coded up an import_module function, that wraps the try, > except ImportError logic into a single unified function.  It has > support for checking the module version and the Python version and > returning None if they are too old,

Re: [sympy] Setting up Jenkins

2011-06-21 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > I think the answer to 1 and 3 depend on what the server limitations > are.  If the server can handle running the tests after each commit, > then I say go for it.  Depending on what the setup is, this might also > include cost limitations.  So

Re: [sympy] Problem with evaluating rotation operator

2011-06-20 Thread Ondrej Certik
Great job! So lets finish the pull request with all this, write tests and get it in. If somebody finds a mistake in sympy, we can fix it later. I think that sympy is right too. Sent from mobile phone On Jun 20, 2011 10:49 AM, "Sean Vig" wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 01:54, Ondrej

Re: [sympy] Problem with evaluating rotation operator

2011-06-19 Thread Ondrej Certik
e%20Notes/Ch11_Angular_20Nov09.pdf > [2] https://github.com/flacjacket/sympy/tree/xyz_bases > > On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 01:06, Sean Vig wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 23:37, Ondrej Certik >> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Sean Vig

Re: [sympy] Problem with evaluating rotation operator

2011-06-19 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Sean Vig wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 23:37, Ondrej Certik > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Sean Vig wrote: >> > Regarding the normalization you impose, I get that same normalization to >> > fall out of th

Re: [sympy] Problem with evaluating rotation operator

2011-06-17 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Sean Vig wrote: > Regarding the normalization you impose, I get that same normalization to > fall out of the equations. From the equations, you get directly > (-I)**(m-mp) * (-1)**(j+mp) > Which is equal to the expression you gave if you start playing with the > ex

Re: [sympy] Problem with evaluating rotation operator

2011-06-17 Thread Ondrej Certik
Derive it for j=1 m=0 m'=1 or 1 0. That's what I did. Just put these numbers in all the equations and it is then easy to check if you get the right expression for beta or not. O. Sent from mobile phone On Jun 17, 2011 2:05 PM, "Sean Vig" wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011

Re: [sympy] Problem with evaluating rotation operator

2011-06-17 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Brian Granger wrote: > Ondrej, > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Ondrej Certik > wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Brian Granger wrote: >>> Sean, >>> >>> Here are some notes I sent to you earlier in th

Re: [sympy] Problem with evaluating rotation operator

2011-06-16 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Brian Granger wrote: > Sean, > > Here are some notes I sent to you earlier in the summer.  The points > made here are quite important.. > > So there are some things you should know about the Wigner D matrix: > > * While I implemented it, I have 0 confidence that th

Re: [sympy] Problem with evaluating rotation operator

2011-06-16 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Aaron S. Meurer wrote: > > On Jun 16, 2011, at 11:17 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Ondrej Certik >>> wrote: >>>> O

Re: [sympy] Problem with evaluating rotation operator

2011-06-16 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Ondrej Certik > wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Ondrej Certik >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Ondrej Certik >>> wrote: >>>> O

Re: [sympy] Problem with evaluating rotation operator

2011-06-16 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Brian Granger wrote: > Sean, > > Here are some notes I sent to you earlier in the summer.  The points > made here are quite important.. > > So there are some things you should know about the Wigner D matrix: > > * While I implemented it, I have 0 confidence th

Re: [sympy] Problem with evaluating rotation operator

2011-06-16 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Ondrej Certik > wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Sean Vig wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> In working on some stuff with spin states, I ran into some problems with the >

Re: [sympy] Problem with evaluating rotation operator

2011-06-16 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Sean Vig wrote: > Hi all, > In working on some stuff with spin states, I ran into some problems with the > current implementation of the Wigner small-d matrix, Rotation.d in > sympy.physics.quantum.spin. I had written methods to change bases using the > Wigner D-f

Re: [sympy] Problem with evaluating rotation operator

2011-06-16 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Sean and Stefan, On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Sean Vig wrote: > I have a pull request open for this here > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/431 > Feel free to review and comment, thanks. > >> Did you noticed that in master qapply(Jx*JxKet(...)) does not evaluate to >> ...*hbar*JxKet. Jz

Re: [sympy] test failures in Sympy 0.7.0 rc2

2011-06-16 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > So we managed to figure this out.  There should be no more test > failures in Windows in the 0.7.0 branch.  Big thanks to Renato > Coutinho and Chris Smith for helping me debug and fix these errors. > > The main cause of the problems was that

Re: [sympy] SymPy 0.7.0 Release Candidate 1

2011-06-14 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > Oh, and just a reminder, I would like for people to sign off all the > changes to the 0.7.0 branch.  Just mention on > http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2488 if you are OK > with them, or if you see any problems. > > And if every

[sympy] filtering sympy-issues in gmail

2011-06-14 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, Previously I was filtering the issues change emails by matching a name "sympy-issues" (I think) in there, which caused all emails, including if somebode CCed me in the issue, to go into my "sympy-issues" label in gmail, which currently has 1883 unread emails, as I don't have enough time to kee

Re: [sympy] SymPy 0.7.0 Release Candidate 1

2011-06-14 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > OK, I put it back in in the 0.7.0 branch.  As soon as I run all the > tests with tox (will take a few hours), I will create 0.7.0.rc2. Thanks! I appreciate it. Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr

Re: [sympy] Re: Some changes to representations in sympy.physics.quantum

2011-06-14 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Julien, On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Julien Rioux wrote: > On Jun 14, 4:37 pm, Tomo Lazovich wrote: >> Another question related to this approach... >> >> Let's say we're trying to represent a simpler expression, like X|x>. We >> could actually do it two different ways: the first being a s

Re: [sympy] SymPy 0.7.0 Release Candidate 1

2011-06-14 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Chris Smith wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: >> >> This was all already fixed in the 0.7.0 branch a while ago.  See my >> second response to this thread and the commits in that branch. >> >> I will run all the tests again in the 0.

Re: [sympy] Re: [IPython-User] isympy in newest ipython

2011-06-14 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Vladimir Perić wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Brian Granger wrote: >> >> OK, then the issue is having the wrong version of IPython installed. >> But, the test suite should be independent of IPython (even the wrong >> version). >> >> Cheers, >> >> Brian

Re: [sympy] Re: [IPython-User] isympy in newest ipython

2011-06-13 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Brian Granger wrote: >> But they probably want to start this at the application level right? >> So the config gets parsed.  Ondrej, we should figure this out before >> sympy0.7 is re

Re: [sympy] Re: [IPython-User] isympy in newest ipython

2011-06-13 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Brian Granger wrote: > But they probably want to start this at the application level right? > So the config gets parsed.  Ondrej, we should figure this out before > sympy0.7 is released so that isympy works with the soon-to-be-released > IPython 0.11. That's right

Re: [sympy] Re: Fit polynomial through points

2011-06-13 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Andy, On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:21 PM, andy wrote: > Hi Ondrej, > > Glad you like it. > I hope this pull request worked, first time for me working with git > and github. > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/415 > > I'm open to suggestions/improvements. Thanks a lot. Good job, it looks good.

Re: [sympy] Fit polynomial through points

2011-06-13 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Andy, On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:55 AM, andy wrote: > Hi, > > I wrote a simple function to fit polynomials. Its based on this > article. > http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LeastSquaresFittingPolynomial.html > Maybe it is useful for you. Awesome! Would you mind sending a pull request to sympy with

[sympy] implicit imports tests broken

2011-06-13 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, I was wondering why the quantum stuff (new and old) uses implicit imports. Well, it turns out that 2.5 years ago we have pushed in a fix https://github.com/sympy/sympy/commit/0d259619130f7610112ad1a87e85ed2fc1dd7b4f to make sure we test implicit imports in doctests and the new regular expres

[sympy] isympy in newest ipython

2011-06-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, when I try to import "isympy" in the newest ipython (installed in Qsnake from qsnake.com), I get: Qsnake: ondrej@eagle:~/repos/sympy(cg_coeff)$ bin/isympy Traceback (most recent call last): File "bin/isympy", line 180, in main() File "bin/isympy", line 177, in main init_session(i

Re: [sympy] Problem with user-defined functions

2011-06-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Luke, On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 12:07 AM, luke wrote: > Hi eveyone, > I'm developing an web application which has to interact with "user- > defined formulas" of some financial kpis. > I decided to use sympy to have a more solid math engine. If you plan to put it online and make it available to p

Re: [sympy] Re: Segmentation fault when importing sympy

2011-06-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
How did you resolve it? Ondrej On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:42 AM, SherjilOzair wrote: > Issue resolved. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this grou

Re: [sympy] Re: Question about representing full expressions in sympy.physics.quantum

2011-06-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Tomo Lazovich wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 3:20 PM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com > wrote: >> >> That remark is quite important. In the same spirit I would like to know if >> there are any arguments for using an expression for the representation >> instead

Re: [sympy] bug in pyglet, please update

2011-06-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 4:02 AM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com wrote: > The pull request is in. It works for me and it is fairly trivial, but there > is always the possibility of side effects. > > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/406 Thanks for this Stefan. pyglet doesn't belong to sympy. Time to

Re: [sympy] add sympy.test() back?

2011-06-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > The reason is basically described in the commit message.  See > http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1379. > > I didn't realize that both numpy and scipy import test().  I'm OK to > put it back, if others agree, because you make a

Re: [sympy] Re: Question about functions in sympy

2011-06-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > OK, I would drop the Lambda subclassing and just write your own eval > method.  Among other things, this will let you use the more logical +1 > argument order WaveFunction(expr, var). > > Another thing about Lambda.  If you do Lambda(x, x*y)

Re: [sympy] Re: Warning in numpy tests

2011-06-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > I ended up employing the following fix: > > https://github.com/asmeurer/sympy/commit/f44195cca3a8cf216c1421532599386702afd704 > > Which basically just does array([3, 8, -1])**S(5.5) instead. Yes, I think that is an ok fix. Thanks, Ondrej -

Re: [sympy] Pull Requests

2011-06-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
Those are good questions. I agree with Aaron and Andy. The best way is to post an email into the list, with a link to your branch, to receive feedback, with some simple instructions what to execute to try it out. Ondrej On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Andy Ray Terrel wrote: > Feel free to ask me

Re: [sympy] SymPy 0.7.0 Release Candidate 1

2011-06-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > After weeks of work, and more than a year since the last release, > we've finally reached a point where we can release a release candidate > for SymPy 0.7.0.  I talked with Ondřej, and we agreed that the best > way to do a release would be to

[sympy] add sympy.test() back?

2011-06-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, I noticed that sympy.test() was removed by this commit: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/commit/5c3bea3f43115911845c5ad8b1e6a92253c3ba91 but from the commit log it is not clear to me why. I also tried to search the mailinglist, but didn't find anything. numpy.test(), as well as scipy.test() is

Re: [sympy] Re: Adding sympy.physics to documentation

2011-06-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Luke wrote: > +1 for sympy.physics.mechanics +1 to sympy.physics.mechanics I can imagine having lots of modules in sympy.physics, directly, i.e. not sympy.physics.something.somethingelse.dynamics, but directly in sympy.physics. Ondrej -- You received this mess

[sympy] how to use tox

2011-06-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, I have noticed the tox.ini.sample in the root directory and also read: http://vperic.blogspot.com/2011/05/continuous-integration-and-sympy.html I have two questions: 1) Wouldn't it make sense to move the tox.ini.sample into some directory, maybe bin/? I think that most users will just do ".

Re: [sympy] SymPy and gmpy

2011-06-07 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Casevh, On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:01 PM, casevh wrote: > Hello, > > I'm the maintainer of gmpy. I am working on a new version (gmpy2) and > I'm curious if there are any enhancements or improvements that would > help SymPy? SymPy uses gmpy though polynomials I think, so Mateusz would be the bes

Re: [sympy] My first gsoc pull request

2011-05-31 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Tom, On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Tom Bachmann wrote: > Hi all, > > I just created a pull request for the first installation of commits I > created for gsoc: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/378/files > > Any comments appreciated. Wow, you did a *lot* of work. Awesome! I'll try to help

Re: [sympy] Re: integer_nthroot and factorint -> iroot and ifactor

2011-05-27 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Chris Smith wrote: > That's ok with me. Let's see if anyone else has an opinion. I for myself prefer the longer names. I don't think this is used so often, so that you should shorten it. But I am ok either way. Ondrej -- You received this message because you ar

Re: [sympy] Reorganise the package structure

2011-05-26 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Brian Granger wrote: > +1 on manipulate > +1 on matrices or matrix, -1 on linear instead of matrx/matrices The same here. Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sy

Re: [sympy] SciPy conference

2011-05-26 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Mateusz Paprocki wrote: > Hi, > together with Aaron, we submitted a tutorial proposal about SymPy for SciPy > conference (11-16 July, Austin, TX). The tutorial was accepted and scheduled > for the introductory tutorial track (4 hour slot) (see [1] for details). >

Re: [sympy] Wolfram|Alpha

2011-05-26 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Mateusz Paprocki wrote: > Hi, > > On 21 May 2011 23:41, Ondrej Certik wrote: >> >> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Aaron S. Meurer >> wrote: >> > This is kind of similar to the oeis() function (issue 2203).  Maybe we >>

Re: [sympy] planet.sympy.org update

2011-05-23 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Mateusz Paprocki wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 23 May 2011 16:17, Ondrej Certik wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Aaron S. Meurer >>> wrote: >>

Re: [sympy] planet.sympy.org update

2011-05-23 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Mateusz Paprocki wrote: > Hi, > > On 23 May 2011 16:17, Ondrej Certik wrote: >> >> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Aaron S. Meurer >> wrote: >> > >> > On May 22, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote: >> >

Re: [sympy] planet.sympy.org update

2011-05-23 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Aaron S. Meurer wrote: > > On May 22, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > >> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Aaron S. Meurer wrote: >>> >>> On May 21, 2011, at 10:10 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: >>> >>>>

Re: [sympy] Re: Remove _op_priority before the release?

2011-05-23 Thread Ondrej Certik
09:51 -0600, Aaron S. Meurer a écrit : >>> > > On May 22, 2011, at 9:34 AM, Andy Ray Terrel wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Ondrej Certik >>> > > > wrote: >>> > > >> On Sat,

Re: [sympy] Re: Remove _op_priority before the release?

2011-05-22 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Andy Ray Terrel wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: >> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Andy Ray Terrel >> wrote: >>> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Ronan Lamy wrote: >>>> Le samedi 21 mai 2

Re: [sympy] planet.sympy.org update

2011-05-22 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Jeremias Yehdegho wrote: > Hi, > > On 05/22/2011 11:10 AM, Tom Bachmann wrote: >> >>>     can you please send me updates with your blog feed url (e.g. all new >>>     GSoC students)? >>> >>> >> >> If I am not misstaken about what a blog feed url is, this should be

Re: [sympy] planet.sympy.org update

2011-05-22 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Aaron S. Meurer wrote: > > On May 21, 2011, at 10:10 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have refactored all the code running planet.sympy.org and it is now >> fully hosted by github. The repository is here: >> >&

[sympy] Re: planet.sympy.org update

2011-05-21 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:57 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have refactored all the code running planet.sympy.org and it is now >> fully hosted by github. The repository is here: >> >> ht

[sympy] Re: planet.sympy.org update

2011-05-21 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > Hi, > > I have refactored all the code running planet.sympy.org and it is now > fully hosted by github. The repository is here: > > https://github.com/sympy/planet.sympy.org > > see the README for information

[sympy] planet.sympy.org update

2011-05-21 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, I have refactored all the code running planet.sympy.org and it is now fully hosted by github. The repository is here: https://github.com/sympy/planet.sympy.org see the README for information how it works. The blogs subscriptions are in planet.ini: https://github.com/sympy/planet.sympy.org/b

Re: [sympy] Re: Remove _op_priority before the release?

2011-05-21 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Andy Ray Terrel wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Ronan Lamy wrote: >> Le samedi 21 mai 2011 à 21:50 -0500, Andy Ray Terrel a écrit : >>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Brian Granger wrote: >>> > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Vinzent Steinberg >>> >

Re: [sympy] Wolfram|Alpha

2011-05-21 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Aaron S. Meurer wrote: > This is kind of similar to the oeis() function (issue 2203).  Maybe we should > create a module for these kinds of things.  It should to in utilities. That's right, I was going to mention oeis() and forgot. All these things do belong in s

Re: [sympy] Wolfram|Alpha

2011-05-21 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Vinzent Steinberg wrote: > Hi, > > apparently it is possible to use a JSON api [1] to Wolfram|Alpha with > 2000 noncommercial calls per month. I think we could integrate it into > sympy, with having each user specify his own Wolfram ID. This might be > useful for

Re: [sympy] Re: Who uses SymPy?

2011-05-17 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Caleb, On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:17 AM, caleb wrote: > Hello, > > I am also a physics student, I would have loved to use Sympy for > calculations in my upper division Quantum Mechanics courses and it > would be great if I could use Sympy for my upcoming course in General > Relativity. I looke

Re: [sympy] Combinatorics update

2011-05-14 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Saptarshi Mandal wrote: > I have fleshed out the structure of a permutation. It inherits from > the Basic class and will attempt to be completely symbolic a bit later > (this part is easy). > The algorithms to generate various permutations itself is in > iterables.

Re: [sympy] Re: Preparing for the 0.7.0 Release

2011-05-13 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Vlada Peric wrote: > I've written a draft changelog, you can check it out on the wiki: > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Release-Notes-for-0.7.0 > > I tried to note just the bigger changes, but I'm sure I made some mistakes > along the way due to not understand

Re: [sympy] Re: Preparing for the 0.7.0 Release

2011-05-13 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Tom Bachmann wrote: >>> >>> The problem is that it leads to tons of (trivial) merge conflicts. Say >>> both >>> you and me add some small feature, and write it to the end of the >>> changelog. >>> Then whoever gets pushed in second will have a merge conflict. Sure,

Re: [sympy] Re: Preparing for the 0.7.0 Release

2011-05-13 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Saptarshi Mandal wrote: > Faster release cycles and kernel style commit messages sound great. > > @Ondrej: Your statement indicates that quality of commit messages is > variable, with some > being really good and some being lousy. My point is that, if you will > no

Re: [sympy] Re: Preparing for the 0.7.0 Release

2011-05-13 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Vlada Peric wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Saptarshi Mandal > wrote: >> >> Doing a git log shows that commit messages typically follow no clear >> pattern. >> The same can be said for patches too. > > I was playing around with git output last night, and

Re: [sympy] deprecate the "ln" function (use "log")

2011-05-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > I don't see any danger in keeping it.  It's just a shortcut, and many > people who are new to using CASs will want to use ln.  And you only > get it from import *, which is supposed to only be in the user > friendly cases (like isympy). Ok,

Re: [sympy] ssh help

2011-05-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:15 PM, smichr wrote: >> I went through the step by step instructions from Help.github to set >> up a new key so I can access github with another computer but it isn't >> working: >> >> I start in an empty .ssh dire

Re: [sympy] Re: Preparing for the 0.7.0 Release

2011-05-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Saptarshi Mandal wrote: >> You can use `git log --name-status` to have git show you the files >> that were modified. > > I'll take the previous example, so in one of the commits if I do a git > log --name-status > I get this > > commit e9f4a0a595eaa82571e1dea55d672

Re: [sympy] Re: Preparing for the 0.7.0 Release

2011-05-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Robert Kern wrote: >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 20:22, Saptarshi Mandal >> wrote: >>> Doing a git log shows that commit messages typically follow no clear >>> pattern. >>> The same can be said for patches too.

[sympy] deprecate the "ln" function (use "log")

2011-05-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, Should we deprecate "ln"? NumPy doesn't have any "ln", neither does Python's math library. Everybody uses "log". In sympy, we just have "ln = log" anyway, so I am all for starting to return a deprecated warning if people use it. And remove it eventually in later releases. Ondrej -- You rec

Re: [sympy] Renaming Real to Float

2011-05-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Ronan Lamy wrote: > Le jeudi 12 mai 2011 à 19:22 -0700, Ondrej Certik a écrit : >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Ronan Lamy wrote: >> > Le jeudi 12 mai 2011 à 16:06 -0700, Ondrej Certik a écrit : >> >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 a

Re: [sympy] Re: Who uses SymPy?

2011-05-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 19:40, Aaron Meurer wrote: >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Ronan Lamy wrote: >>> Le jeudi 12 mai 2011 à 16:41 -0600, Aaron Meurer a écrit : Would it require the ast module?  That is only available on 2.6+.  Bu

Re: [sympy] Renaming Real to Float

2011-05-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Ronan Lamy wrote: > Le jeudi 12 mai 2011 à 16:06 -0700, Ondrej Certik a écrit : >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: >> > Hi. >> > >> > There was a discussion over at >> > http://code.google.co

Re: [sympy] Structure of Matrix module

2011-05-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Sherjil Ozair wrote: > Hello everyone, > I took ideas from mattpap's thesis at [1], specifically the idea of multi > level structure. Wow, I didn't know that Mateusz's master thesis is in sphinx: http://mattpap.github.com/masters-thesis/html/index.html I think i

Re: [sympy] Preparing for the 0.7.0 Release

2011-05-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > Hi everyone. > > I am now off of classes, so my top priority is to get the release out. >  My goal is to have the release out by the end of the month. > > There are some things that need to be done before the release: > > - Fix all blocking is

Re: [sympy] Renaming Real to Float

2011-05-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > Hi. > > There was a discussion over at > http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1721 to rename the > Real class to Float, because the name fits the class better.  The > reasoning is that Real represents floating point numbers, not any

Re: [sympy] Re: Who uses SymPy?

2011-05-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > Would it require the ast module?  That is only available on 2.6+.  But > that's better than nothing.  1/2 vs. S(1)/2 is by far the number one > gotcha that I see. Here is the file (I think it works for 2.5+): https://github.com/sympy/sympy/b

Re: [sympy] Re: Who uses SymPy?

2011-05-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > I'm undecided if it should be done in isympy.  Maybe there should at > least be an option. I think we should do it as an option, yes. And we can start using it, as an option and see how it goes. > As for how to do it, can sympify be extended

Re: [sympy] Re: Who uses SymPy?

2011-05-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: [...] > prerequisites for SymPy (like Python itself if you are on Windows). > If there were a nice GUI that was friendly, like easy access to docs, > automatic sympification (so no one gets caught by 1/2 problems), Just curious about this part

Re: [sympy] Who uses SymPy?

2011-05-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Matthew, On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Matthew Rocklin wrote: > Do we have a clear understanding of who our userbase is? > Is SymPy being used for education? for research in academia? in industry? I > imagine the answer is that "yes, it's being used in all of those places". Yes, that's the

Re: [sympy] Re: Sympy on Android (SL4A with Python)

2011-05-12 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Roberto Colistete Jr. wrote: >   Hi guys, > >   Problem solved ! I found the problem and the solution : as in PyS60 > (Python for Symbian/S60), the "timeit.pyc" is needed by SymPy and not > available (on PyS60 or Python 2.6.2for Android), so (a compatible) > "timei

Re: [sympy] Question regarding vectors

2011-05-09 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Ronan Lamy wrote: >>> Le lundi 09 mai 2011 à 17:30 -0700, Luke a écrit : >>>> Here is a more explicit example of what Gil

Re: [sympy] Question regarding vectors

2011-05-09 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Ronan Lamy wrote: >> Le lundi 09 mai 2011 à 17:30 -0700, Luke a écrit : >>> Here is a more explicit example of what Gilbert is talking about: >>> In [1]: from sympy import * >>> In [2]: from pydy import * >>> In

Re: [sympy] Sympy on Android (SL4A with Python)

2011-05-08 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi Roberto, On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Roberto Colistete Jr. wrote: >    Hi, > >    It is my first participation here : how can I install Sympy on > Android (using SL4A with Python) ? I tried copying the "sympy" tree to > "/sdcard/com.googlecode.pythonforandroid/extras/python/" but I try > l

Re: [sympy] Re: Assumptions

2011-05-06 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 7:29 AM, Chris Smith wrote: > Regarding caching...is the use of @memoize any better than @cacheit? I think it's essentially the same. However, if the cache is just a dictionary, as it is now, then it is a *bad* idea. Here is some intro into caching: http://en.wikipedia.org

Re: [sympy] Re: sympy leadership

2011-05-05 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Vinzent Steinberg wrote: > On 4 Mai, 04:46, Ondrej Certik wrote: >> * Ondrej is the "project originator and owner" that has ultimate >> responsibility for the project > > What does "project owner" mean? It simply means th

Re: [sympy] Re: Assumptions

2011-05-05 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Haz wrote: >>> Well as far as I understand the problems wrt caching and assumptions in >>> the current model are: >>> 1) Assumptions are tied in at the lowest level of the core (which >>> apparently is a problem

[sympy] Re: patches review tips

2011-05-05 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > Hi, > > I am sharing some patch review tips, and I am interested in any > feedback. I look at my github notification page and see what new pull > requests were made, or what new comments were made. Then I open lots > of ter

[sympy] patches review tips

2011-05-05 Thread Ondrej Certik
Hi, I am sharing some patch review tips, and I am interested in any feedback. I look at my github notification page and see what new pull requests were made, or what new comments were made. Then I open lots of terminal tabs, and in each execute the following: ./sympy-bot --reference /home/ondrej/

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >