On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski
w
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>
> Try divisors() from sympy/ntheory/factor_.py. I trie
Chris has a divisors function in his 1766 branch that he claims is
faster than our current one.
Aaron Meurer
Sent from my iPod touch.
On Mar 8, 2010, at 5:56 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Ondrej Certik
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
Try divisors() from sympy/ntheory/factor_.py. I tried that with Cython
(pure Python mode, so that you have
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>>>
>>> Try divisors() from sympy/ntheory/factor_.py. I tried that with Cython
>>> (pure Python mode, so that you have the same source code, that works
>>> both in Python and in Cython
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>>
>> Try divisors() from sympy/ntheory/factor_.py. I tried that with Cython
>> (pure Python mode, so that you have the same source code, that works
>> both in Python and in Cython) and I forgot which speedup I got, but at
>> least 10x, may
>
> Try divisors() from sympy/ntheory/factor_.py. I tried that with Cython
> (pure Python mode, so that you have the same source code, that works
> both in Python and in Cython) and I forgot which speedup I got, but at
> least 10x, maybe up to 25x. Should be in the archives of this list.
>
> Ondrej
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> Half a year ago, I was asking about sympy benchmarks. So here is some
>>> feedback on what I got using
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> Half a year ago, I was asking about sympy benchmarks. So here is some
>> feedback on what I got using the JIT. Running the very simple
>> benchmark, like this:
>>
>> i
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Half a year ago, I was asking about sympy benchmarks. So here is some
> feedback on what I got using the JIT. Running the very simple
> benchmark, like this:
>
> import sympy
> import time
> x, y = sympy.symbols('x, y')
>
> fo
Hello.
Half a year ago, I was asking about sympy benchmarks. So here is some
feedback on what I got using the JIT. Running the very simple
benchmark, like this:
import sympy
import time
x, y = sympy.symbols('x, y')
for i in range(10):
t0 = time.time()
sympy.factor(x**20 - y**20)
prin
11 matches
Mail list logo