Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #12 on issue 2246 by smi...@gmail.com: Global directive to switch
strict transformations
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2246
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Updates:
Labels: NeedsReview smichr
Comment #11 on issue 2246 by smi...@gmail.com: Global directive to switch
strict transformations
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2246
Inverses of functions not having a strict inverse are now recognized in
solve so `solve(atan(x) -
Comment #10 on issue 2246 by smi...@gmail.com: Global directive to switch
strict transformations
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2246
The reason that solve(atan(x)-y, x) does not return [tan(y)] is because the
inverse is not defined for atan:
>>> tan(x).inverse()
Comment #9 on issue 2246 by smi...@gmail.com: Global directive to switch
strict transformations
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2246
You might try any equation you have a question about on my (smichr) 1694
github branch where the new solve is located.
--
You received this
Comment #8 on issue 2246 by yuri.kar...@gmail.com: Global directive to
switch strict transformations
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2246
The behavior of sole is really strange it solve
In [6]: eq=tan(f(x))-x-c
In [7]: solve(eq, f(x))
Out[7]: [atan(c + x)]
but have NotImple
Comment #7 on issue 2246 by yuri.kar...@gmail.com: Global directive to
switch strict transformations
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2246
Yes, the example is totally wrong, but we can have another one:
tan(f(x)) = x+C
And we have to face this problem anyway. I hope to catch y
Comment #6 on issue 2246 by asmeurer: Global directive to switch strict
transformations
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2246
Yes, I agree about global switches, if just because of the fact that they
are testing nightmares.
--
You received this message because you are subsc
Comment #5 on issue 2246 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Global directive to
switch strict transformations
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2246
Having a global switch is always a bad idea, I think. Such things tend to
cause a lot of trouble. Even as an option, turning it on would c
Comment #4 on issue 2246 by yuri.kar...@gmail.com: Global directive to
switch strict transformations
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2246
Sure they could. But still it will be better to divide this problem into
two subproblems (it could be one issue):
1st - change standard a
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #3 on issue 2246 by asmeurer: Global directive to switch strict
transformations
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2246
I think they could be solved together. solve() should have a keyword
option that lets it ignore little niceties lik
Comment #2 on issue 2246 by yuri.kar...@gmail.com: Global directive to
switch strict transformations
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2246
Sure it is part of issue 1572, but they can be solved separately. This
issue - for elementary and special function (because it's straight
Comment #1 on issue 2246 by asmeurer: Global directive to switch strict
transformations
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2246
This is related to issue 1572.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy-issues" group.
To post to this grou
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 2246 by yuri.kar...@gmail.com: Global directive to switch strict
transformations
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2246
It is vitally to differential equation module to add ability to switch
behavior of symp
13 matches
Mail list logo
