Re: [Tagging] Tar sands tagging

e subject of a 2021 proposal. > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dtailings_pond > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Tailings_pond > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 12:37 PM Dave Swarthout > wrote: > >> I'm reading a book about the Alberta Tar Sa

[Tagging] Tar sands tagging

lings tag. What do you think? -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog: http://dswarthout.blogspot.com Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/184600884@N06 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Barrier=berm

; Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Tagging estuaries: estuary=yes or river=estuary?

gging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Tagging estuaries: estuary=yes or river=estuary?

stuary encompases and what makes sense to map. > > Best, > Clifford > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 5:26 PM Dave Swarthout > wrote: > >> Then there is the additional problem that the terminal end of the way >> used to indicate the waterway=river connects with the "coa

Re: [Tagging] Tagging estuaries: estuary=yes or river=estuary?

ng@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Divided highways, and not so divided highways, one way or two

ou have > strict standards and definitions? > > Bye > Frederik > > -- > Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.or

Re: [Tagging] New tag proposal: 'addr=milestone'

; Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] New tag proposal: 'addr=milestone'

rural > areas of the USA to indicate linear position along a main road. > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog a

Re: [Tagging] Strange tags

he Tagging group. On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 8:40 AM Kevin Kenny wrote: > On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 7:51 PM Dave Swarthout > wrote: > > > > Well, I'll be damned. These hikers, or "hillbaggers", are using these > tags for their own purposes. Many of them could e

Re: [Tagging] Strange tags

al knowledge tags something > only understood in a very small area, it is still improving the map. > > ael > > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > ___

[Tagging] Strange tags

that a valid tag? And what is a "donald", or corbett=yes donald=yes ele=821 graham=no man_made=cairn munro=no name=White Coomb natural=peak note=cairn yes source=local_knowledge wikidata=Q7994603 wikipedia=en:White Coomb -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thai

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - traffic_calming=dynamic_bump

e down beneath > the surface? Maybe traffic_calming=dynamic/variable? > > > > Regards > > Ant > > > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer,

Re: [Tagging] bear box in campground ?

_____ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Use of tag "import=yes" on objects, not changesets?

at, 10 Aug 2019 at 17:27, Dave Swarthout > wrote: > >> The decision to use the import=yes tag wasn't mine nor that of other >> experienced Thailand mappers. The Facebook crew "invented" this use, for >> whatever internal reason(s)of their own and we local mappe

Re: [Tagging] Use of tag "import=yes" on objects, not changesets?

er_vision_assisted" for the facebook > stuff, or something else more specific, since "import=yes" should mean > that the data came from an external source, rather than from on of our > usually sources aerial imagery. > > Joseph > > On 8/10/19, Dave Swarthout wrote

Re: [Tagging] Use of tag "import=yes" on objects, not changesets?

t available > pre-packaged for all distros. > > -- > Paul > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chian

Re: [Tagging] Road hierarchy

d > and signed for navigation. > > I agree that a parking aisle or urban driveway is unlikely to have a name. > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstree

Re: [Tagging] Road hierarchy

not, as an unclassified road is part of the interconnection > grid, while a residential road is not > > > > Cheers Martin > > ___ > > Tagging mailing list > > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > ____

Re: [Tagging] shop=cannabis including medical cannabis

56 PM Jmapb via Tagging wrote: > On 6/14/2019 5:33 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote: > > > Martin wrote: > > > > >It would imply adding shop=cannabis to pharmacies? In some countries > > the sale of medicine is restricted to pharmacies. > > > > Not necessarily.

Re: [Tagging] shop=cannabis including medical cannabis

d to pharmacies. > > > Cheers, Martin > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog

Re: [Tagging] shop=cannabis including medical cannabis

whenever > that exists, could be tagged cannabis=yes or cannabis:medical=yes.) > > J > > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swart

Re: [Tagging] refugee camp

ps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Refugee_Camp_Boundaries > > I also think is is something to dig in and happy to help... > > Best, > > V > > On 11/06/2019 05:39, Jan S wrote: > > > > Am 10. Juni 2019 22:05:53 MESZ schrieb Dave Swarthout < > dave

Re: [Tagging] refugee camp

nfamous Jungle in Calais or the already >> > dismantled Idomeini camp, to permanent structures like asylum-seeker >> > reception centres like this: >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390153052). >> > >> > I'll see if I can give it a try over the next weeks... or would that be >> a >> > task for a coordinated action? >> > >> > Best, Jan >> > >> >> ___ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Complicated traffic light combinations

There is a switch in the Show submenu of the Configure Map menu named OSM Notes, Flick it on and the notes appear. Dave On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 10:52 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 09:35, Dave Swarthout > wrote: > >> Actually, OSMand will displa

Re: [Tagging] Complicated traffic light combinations

Actually, OSMand will display notes if you enable that feature. It's a useful tool if you happen to be an OSM mapper. On Thu, Jun 6, 2019, 3:21 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 07/06/19 08:58, Andy Townsend wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've just mapped the traffic lights for a river cros

Re: [Tagging] tracktype=*;*;*

agging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Subtag for place=locality?

relate this to GeoJSON concepts, the first is like > a GeoJSON FeatureCollection where individual Features are > Polygons/MultiPolygons, while the second is just a GeoJSON MultiPolygon. > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.

Re: [Tagging] Avoid using place=locality - find more specific tags instead

amed groups: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Group_Relation > > Regards > > Markus > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Subtag for place=locality?

t;>>> peaks, wetlands, lakes, islands, deserts, caves, settlements, etc. so > >>>> we don’t use locality for them) > >>>> > >>>> I’m not sure I’d support locality subtags, for lots of things a main > >>>> tag might be more fitting with the

Re: [Tagging] Subtag for place=locality?

t; - the road has mature trees standing in it and is not passable for any > distance by anything on wheels, but the fact that the area was once a > settlement is obvious. (I've found the remains of a mill, a tannery, and a > forge in that former settlement, but have not been able

Re: [Tagging] Subtag for place=locality?

e, how many of the imported locality nodes seem to be > correctly tagged? > > Could many of them be something more specific, like natural=valley, > natural=ridge, natural=peak, natural=bay, railway=junction, > highway=junction, place=island, etc? > > Joseph

Re: [Tagging] Subtag for place=locality?

let/village/town > > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/abandoned:place#values > > which seems inline with the rest of our tagging and is by far more > frequent than any “ghost” variations. > > Cheers, Martin > > > ___ > Tagging mailing >

Re: [Tagging] Was barrier=jersey_barrier approved in a proposal?

ame for jersey barriers came from, probably from > tagging ml discussion (it is not a word I have in my vocabulary) > > Cheers, Martin > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetma

Re: [Tagging] Clarification unclassified vs residential

; > Andy > > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > ___ > Tagging mailing > listTagging@openstr

Re: [Tagging] Clarification unclassified vs residential

- there is no such >> default. It's certainly not your fault - English as used to describe >> roads in the UK is the problem, with "unclassified" meaning a particular >> explicit classification. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Andy >> >

Re: [Tagging] Clarification unclassified vs residential

match >> (but oppose) the English versions which i typically use and prefer. >> >> Its not the first time i find the German articles to contain a hidden >> agenda bei a minority or single mappers trying to steer the community. >> >> Flo >> -- >> Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de >> UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away >> ___ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Clarification unclassified vs residential

to tag those as unclassified for a bit higher priority may > not be optimal - but suitable. > > This discussion - and usage - is some years old now - and I thought you > had at least knowledge of it from the german forum. > > Georg > __

Re: [Tagging] Clarification unclassified vs residential

gt; > Flo > -- > Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de > UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https

Re: [Tagging] Fwd: [tagging] Canoe route / nautical channels

would it also work for your canoeing purposes? > > Thanks > > Graeme > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swart

Re: [Tagging] Fwd: [tagging] Canoe route / nautical channels

craft, along with Dave & Kevin's canoe > experience :-), I've edited the page as discussed above > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dfairway > > Are we all happy with that? > > Thanks > > Graeme > ___

Re: [Tagging] Fwd: [tagging] Canoe route / nautical channels

ween them. Solving this problem is the reason I made my suggestion. Dave On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 4:45 AM Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 04:05, Fernando Trebien > wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:49 AM Dave Swarthout >> wrote: >> > >

Re: [Tagging] Fwd: [tagging] Canoe route / nautical channels

=fairway idea? On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 9:12 PM Kevin Kenny wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 7:49 AM Dave Swarthout > wrote: > > > > The seamark definition in the supplied link is very general. I cannot > see how anyone could misinterpret this use of either waterway=fairway or &

Re: [Tagging] Fwd: [tagging] Canoe route / nautical channels

.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Generic:Map_Features:waterway > [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Seamarks/Seamark_Objects > > -- > Fernando Trebien > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > T

Re: [Tagging] motorcycle:scale

it's a long way from that to reaching consensus. Or am I missing your point totally? On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 8:03 PM Paul Allen wrote: > On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 12:12, Dave Swarthout > wrote: > >> >> I like the idea of the "informal" category but isn't tha

Re: [Tagging] motorcycle:scale

pirit of things. };-) > > How about "impromptu" or "extempore" or "ad hoc" instead of informal? > When more widely > used we could change the status to "de facto." > > Maybe I should eschew obfuscation. > > -- > Paul > > __

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – natural=peninsula (Was: Feature Proposal – RFC – place=peninsula)

ninsula > > Thank you all for your suggestions for improvement! > > Regards > > Markus > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave

Re: [Tagging] Drain vs ditch

s for deviding land. consider using > waterway=canal for large irrigation or land drainage channels. consider > using waterway=drain for lined superflous liquid drainage channels. > > No need to introduce any new tags. > > Eugene > > ср, 16 янв. 2019 г. в 05:12, Warin <

Re: [Tagging] Trailhead tagging

t. > > I don't want to change the earlier proposal, it is a step further than my > concept tagging page which just documents existing practice. > > > Vr gr Peter Elderson > > > Op di 15 jan. 2019 om 00:41 schreef Dave Swarthout < > daveswarth...@gmail.com>: >

Re: [Tagging] Creating shop=caravan

ki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shop%3Drecreational_vehicle > > How's that? > > As always, all comments welcomed! > > Thanks > > Graeme > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreet

Re: [Tagging] Drain vs ditch

etmap.org/wiki/Waterways> used to carry useful > water, usually for irrigation purposes. Channels are usually straight, but > can be either lined or unlined. > > Would something like that clarify matters? > > Thanks > > Graeme > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Trailhead tagging

gt; > Bit of a problem when you've got to walk back the 65 klm looking for it! > > Thanks > > Graeme > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/ta

Re: [Tagging] Creating shop=caravan

e shop=caravan. > > As far as I can see, that should cover everything, shouldn't it? > > Thanks > > Graeme > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagg

Re: [Tagging] Creating shop=caravan

should ever take Wikipedia as gospel for anything, but > that accords well with > (British) English definitions of "mobile" and "home." You can live in it > (home) and you can > move it around (mobile). "Motor home" excludes towed caravans and static > caravans (no

Re: [Tagging] Creating shop=caravan

s" > > > > Thanks > > > > Graeme > > “Travel trailers”. > > A generic plain “trailer” is probably for cargo or hauling your ATV, > snowmobiles or “dirt bikes”. > > > > ___ > Tagging mailing lis

Re: [Tagging] Creating shop=caravan

in and out of utility vehicles and > act as accommodation. > > I think the 'mobile home' is an acceptable term to cover the lot. Why is > it unacceptable? > The emphasise on 'permanent' I think is wrong, but there is enough > vagueness to accept that 'mob

Re: [Tagging] Creating shop=caravan

. We could distinguish between the two basic varieties, motorized or trailer in some other tag. Dave PS: Martin's idea about OSM v2.0. Good one, Martin! On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 3:51 PM Dave Swarthout wrote: > Warin, You're in Australia, right? When I was traveling in New Zealand I'

Re: [Tagging] Creating shop=caravan

ck to you. On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 3:36 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13/01/19 19:06, Dave Swarthout wrote: > > >Possibly a separate page again for shop=motorhome? (I think that would be > a good coverall term?) > > I would prefer that but it's an A

Re: [Tagging] Creating shop=caravan

aeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > > On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 at 13:06, Dave Swarthout > wrote: > >> I'm assuming that this tagging scheme is also for a shop that sells only >> caravan parts and accessories but not caravans. >> > > No, I've tried to set it up

Re: [Tagging] Creating shop=caravan

em all out? > > > > all the other languages are still listed? > > > > Thanks > > > > Graeme > > > > Ok, so I don't know why but I just added the type=value parameter to > the ValueDescription template and it looks good now. > > > > Lore

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – natural=peninsula (Was: Feature Proposal – RFC – place=peninsula)

de of an object > which is even worse. > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarth

Re: [Tagging] Creating shop=caravan

title of the page you want to create in the wiki search box > ... > >>> It will come up with a suggestion to create the page you want .. click > on that and you have started to create the new page :) > >>> Copy all of the stuff you have on your word processor page over to the > new page (copy and paste) .. and save it .

Re: [Tagging] Creating shop=caravan

page :) > Copy all of the stuff you have on your word processor page over to the new > page (copy and paste) .. and save it ... Done. > > On 07/01/19 11:23, Dave Swarthout wrote: > > Haha, Graeme. I am in the same boat when it comes to adding anything to > the Wiki. Welcome

Re: [Tagging] Creating shop=caravan

op=caravan page ready for further editing, but will the original shop=car > page still exist? > > Is there a better way to create a new page? > > Thanks > > Graeme > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/l

Re: [Tagging] amenity=taxi vehicle type

> Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com ___ Tagging m

Re: [Tagging] motorcycle tagging

m to set up a proposal. > > Rather than 'set up a proposal' I would ask the contributor (and that is > not Allen) to discuss the matter here. > > Possible problems are that the contributor does not have good English > skills and maybe reactant to enter into that problem area comb

Re: [Tagging] Trailhead tagging

else: optional, map and tag as seems appropriate. >> > >> >> >> ___ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > > -- > Vr gr Peter Elderson >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – natural=peninsula (Was: Feature Proposal – RFC – place=peninsula)

e York Peninsula, > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cape_York_Peninsula which is a peninsula > terminating in Cape York - definitely no "narrow strips of land" involved! > :-) > > Thanks > > Graeme > > > > ___

Re: [Tagging] request for review: OSM wiki rewording of tourism=motel based on Wikipedia

is licensed > to sell alcohol, while a motel isn't. Granted, that doesn't effect > accommodation options, but a motel is not, strictly speaking, a hotel. > > Thanks > > Graeme > ___ > Tagging mailing list > T

Re: [Tagging] request for review: OSM wiki rewording of tourism=motel based on Wikipedia

rking=y/n, parking:fee=y/n, etc? > > Tobias > > > Am 24.12.2018 um 01:12 schrieb Joseph Eisenberg: > > In the USA, we would also assume a motel offers free parking. Hotels may > charge extra for parking, especial if located downtown or next to an > airport. > &

Re: [Tagging] Trailhead tagging

ut they are the minority here I would say. > > all the best for the new Year > Tobias > > > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – place=peninsula

tc > > Thanks > > Graeme > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Top up

semantically. > > > top_up:credit_card:‹brand›=yes;no > > As said, if the amount is pre-paid, it is not a credit card. It might be a > debit card because you > have to have the money in advance. > > tom > > ___ > Taggin

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal – RFC – place=peninsula

g@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] request for review: OSM wiki rewording of tourism=motel based on Wikipedia

or what should have >> been pensions and guest houses around here, I'll also fix these later. >> ___ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > ___ > Ta

Re: [Tagging] Trailhead tagging

>> Tagging mailing >> listTagging@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> ___ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openst

Re: [Tagging] Salumeria(it) / charcuterie(fr) / Wurstwaren (de) WAS Re: Can OSM become a geospacial database?

_ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.o

Re: [Tagging] How to map a sliding section of the Alaska Pipeline

one is the 'conventional sense' of a rail line - the other rail > is for positioning. > > Michael Patrick > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - boundary=aboriginal_lands

g > since it presumably went through the approval process and passed, and > people actually use it, but > right now it looks like Satan conceived it to torment mappers before they > die. > > -- > Paul > > ___ > Taggin

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 110, Issue 135 Trans Alaska oil line

Hi Nick, No, I had not. But it's a good suggestion. On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 5:35 AM St Niklaas wrote: > Hi Dave, > > > Did you thought about movable=yes just as an extra value ? > > > Greetz > > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang M

[Tagging] How to map a sliding section of the Alaska Pipeline

t.jpg?dl=0>: https://www.dropbox.com/s/209xatghack8m35/Trans_Alaska_Pipeline_Denali_fault_shift.jpg?dl=0 -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://li

Re: [Tagging] Using multipolygons to map bays in Alaska

. > > -- > Paul > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com

Re: [Tagging] Using multipolygons to map bays in Alaska

2018 at 6:26 PM Christoph Hormann wrote: > On Friday 16 November 2018, Dave Swarthout wrote: > > > > To answer Christoph's question about Chickaloon Bay and the node for > > the same bay, I simply forgot to delete the redundant node after I > > finished. Interestingly, the

Re: [Tagging] Using multipolygons to map bays in Alaska

he right time to discuss what to do about bays, > straits, estuaries, and similar features.) The argument would also have to > distinguish between the cost of maintaining the data on the server - the > real OSM - and the cost of processing the data in the OSM-Carto re

Re: [Tagging] Using multipolygons to map bays in Alaska

y but at the moment I'm prepared to leave it as it is. There are so many other mapping chores to do in Alaska it boggles the mind. Cheers, Dave On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 6:11 PM Christoph Hormann wrote: > On Thursday 15 November 2018, Dave Swarthout wrote: > > [...] > >

[Tagging] Using multipolygons to map bays in Alaska

orthand" solution. Besides, I'm betting some other useful information will issue from the discussion. Dave [1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-October/040062.html [2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8921978#map=9/61.1074/-149.5541 -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska

Re: [Tagging] Petroleum extraction

g + substance/content=oil. > > What do you think about it? > > > -- > "Excuse me, I have some growing up to do" [P. Gabriel] > > > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@ope

Re: [Tagging] رد: رد: New rag to draw node name with rotate angle

would prefer > > > to place town label inland). As result placement of this nodes is > optimized for specific map styles, > > > making them form of tagging for the renderer. ) > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinf

Re: [Tagging] How to tag named group of named water areas?

_ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Estimated values for height

nly estimated ! ;-) > > > > > > Lionel > > > > > > > > Le ven. 9 nov. 2018 à 10:19, Dave Swarthout > <mailto:daveswarth...@gmail.com>> a écrit : > > > > There is already an est_width tag (Taginfo 77,000). I see no reason > >

Re: [Tagging] Estimated values for height

t; > > > [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:est_width > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swar

Re: [Tagging] How to tag named group of named water areas?

ot;essential tags" (like > natural=water) > allways belong to the members and not any encompassing relation such as > relation:waterway. > man_made=pipeline looks like on of those tags I would always put on the > members, > not the relation. > > Richard > > __

Re: [Tagging] How to tag named group of named water areas?

Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 5:31 PM Peter Elderson wrote: > And route=foot does not mean al the components are footpaths. > > Op do 8 nov. 2018 om 11:05 schreef Andy Townsend : > >> On 08/11/2018 01:59, Dave Swarthout wrote: >> > To my way of thinking, a tag in the relation impli

Re: [Tagging] How to tag named group of named water areas?

re route, just as do Wikidata and Wikipedia tags, substance, etc. IMO, those tags belong on the relation and are not necessary on the individual ways. Best, Dave On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 5:05 PM Andy Townsend wrote: > On 08/11/2018 01:59, Dave Swarthout wrote: > > To my way of thinking, a t

Re: [Tagging] How to tag named group of named water areas?

hink that the wiki is not the bible (it's a wiki), > secondly OSM is not that square as it is made to be edited by hand. > Keep it simple here just means that mapping a way is simpler than a > relation for most. > Yves -- Dave Swarthou

Re: [Tagging] How to tag named group of named water areas?

gt;> pipeline. >> >>> > I'm not super familiar with them compared to railroads, but similar > naming conventions exist. Branches and trunks often have differing names > while being part of the same overall pipeline. > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreet

Re: [Tagging] How to tag named group of named water areas?

> > > -- > Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Tagging-f5258744.html > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at ht

Re: [Tagging] How to tag named group of named water areas?

t; relations to dig out the details. I know for a fact that without a man_made=pipeline tag on those ways, my current style sheet won't find them and will be unable to render them. Unless I get help from Gerd. LOL On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 2:27 PM Dave Swarthout wrote: > It's true. Ge

Re: [Tagging] How to tag named group of named water areas?

y different and Dave insists that it is are not. Seems we are both > frustated now :-( > > Gerd > > > > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Tagging-f5258744.html > > ___ > Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] How to tag named group of named water areas?

ations. > So, if one starts to remove tags from members because the relation repeats > the tag he has to make sure that this is a well established method. Not > sure > if this is the case for pipelines? > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Tagging-f52

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >