Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - crossing=marked

2019-05-12 Thread Tony Shield
Do we map the pedestrian aspects of traffic light controlled crossings? i.e the Walk/DontWalk or the Green/Red figures? As a pedestrian I have used many British traffic junctions controlled by traffic lights for the vehicles but no aspects for the pedestrian who has to guess and hope. Can we

Re: [Tagging] Apps of delivery

2019-05-12 Thread Tony Shield
Like the idea. delivery_contact might be better. What about multiple delivery companies from one poi/restaurant? Maintainability of the tag might be an issue - how often does the delivery supplier change? In my area there are at least 3 delivery suppliers all competing for business. TonyS99

Re: [Tagging] Misuse of name tag for route description

2019-05-12 Thread Tony Shield
To me what is emerging is that there is no formal or official name for  many of the things we are trying to map. If OSM puts a name against a route it is the idea of the individual mapper possibly in agreement with others. If a guidebook has a named walking route which is a different name to t

Re: [Tagging] Handicap Parking Access Aisles

2019-05-02 Thread Tony Shield
er5/5p15a.JPG On 02/05/19 12:36, Tony Shield wrote: Hi [AA] is a Mapillary picture of a typical UK disabled parking bay, the hatched area is a what I think you are calling an 'access aisle'.  Those particular disabled parking bays are legally designated and enf

Re: [Tagging] Handicap Parking Access Aisles

2019-05-02 Thread Tony Shield
space for the disabled has a dedicated "access aisle" similar to the photo. If you want to achieve disabled (wheelchair) routing I would assume it to be sufficient to map the disabled parking spaces within the car park. [1] https://mycloud.snowandsnow.us/index.php/s/F2mAATCQ54Szf

Re: [Tagging] Handicap Parking Access Aisles

2019-05-02 Thread Tony Shield
Having today downloaded and read SN01360 [2] |I disagree with the interpretation. In that document there is only one mention of 'aisle' it being an 'access aisle' in Section 5.4 paragraph marked Off-Street Parking  -" *Off-street parking*: bays should be a minimum of 4800 mm long by 2400 mm wid

Re: [Tagging] tags for a live stock sale yard

2019-04-15 Thread Tony Shield
Hi You seem to be describing a stockyard that is associated with an auction. Could these be relevant starters for tags? Tony On 15/04/2019 00:23, Warin wrote: In Australia commercial livestock (sheep, cattle) are sold through these livestock markets. They may be transported for several day

Re: [Tagging] Was barrier=jersey_barrier approved in a proposal?

2019-04-14 Thread Tony Shield
I was unfamiliar with the term jersey_barrier - but then there are other barriers I was unfamiliar with. I'm happy to use it - I'm English in England - as there are no dual-uses I am aware of. https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Wp18aKeOYiiFWti5nTqorQ  in my opinion shows some very posh jersey-ba

Re: [Tagging] Tagging shared campuses: landuse=school?

2019-04-04 Thread Tony Shield
Hi Like that. Similar issues in UK. TonyS999 On 04/04/2019 08:55, Jeroen Hoek wrote: # Background When tagging a school, as per the current documentation, ideally the amenity=school tag is applied to the school grounds, implying its landuse. This works fine for single schools that have their

Re: [Tagging] Horse mounting steps compared to horse walker

2019-04-01 Thread Tony Shield
Hi Could you have a look at this - https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1362124#contributions and have confidence that this historic grade II mounting block will fit into the schema? Its not presently in use as it is in a school yard. TonyS999 On 01/04/2019 08:16, Ma

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - police=*

2019-03-15 Thread Tony Shield
Agreed - don't change the meaning. If additional information is required - and I'm not sure why - then additional police=* tag is a good alternate to the Amenity tag. TonyS On 15/03/2019 06:55, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: Please don’t change the established meaning of amenity=police; it should ke

Re: [Tagging] Superroutes - good, bad or ugly?

2019-03-14 Thread Tony Shield
route relations. Polyglot On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, 15:41 Paul Allen <mailto:pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 11:21, Tony Shield mailto:tony.shield...@gmail.com>> wrote: Am I right in thinking that a superroute is a sequence of ways and relat

Re: [Tagging] Superroutes - good, bad or ugly?

2019-03-14 Thread Tony Shield
Warin Great description of PTV2. Paul Am I right in thinking that a superroute is a sequence of ways and relations of ways? The relation of ways could be called a route-segment or similar. A I see it routes for most trains and buses are a sequence of ways and route-segments, and a route-segm

Re: [Tagging] mapping large memorial objects that roads pass through.

2019-03-13 Thread Tony Shield
Been wondering for months how to tag arches in general - not a mention in Wiki. I do like man-made = arch. I do think that there are several major types of arch which help, so this discussion started with torii and a possible answer is given as Perhaps they could be man_made=archway and arch

Re: [Tagging] Emergency vehicle country-specific law

2019-03-07 Thread Tony Shield
Fire fighting foam needs to be mixed with water. On 07/03/2019 14:24, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 7. Mar 2019, at 14:39, Richard Welty wrote: there are other examples. for example, the Chief of the Port Henry department in upstate NY oversees a district that is adjacent

Re: [Tagging] What is a conscription number (addr:conscriptionnumber)?

2019-03-03 Thread Tony Shield
Hi Don't have these in UK. I understood what you were describing easily  - I've seen them on my travels but did not understand why a house could have two numbers - now I do. Regards On 03/03/2019 07:28, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: I attempted to de describe conscription numbers at https://wiki

Re: [Tagging] units and notations for maxstay

2019-02-21 Thread Tony Shield
No Tag means don't know, any tag value means its been checked and this is the value. TonyS On 21/02/2019 19:15, Andrew Errington wrote: If there is no limit then omit the maxstay tag. No tag, no limit. Andrew On Fri, Feb 22, 2019, 07:47 Tobias Knerr wrote:

Re: [Tagging] units and notations for depth

2019-02-19 Thread Tony Shield
ic to that purpose. TonyS On 19/02/2019 10:56, Colin Smale wrote: On 2019-02-19 11:11, Tony Shield wrote: Depth of water in tidal areas can vary enormously. People using depth for navigation and general use would expect to use depth at MLWS (Mean Low Water Springs) and add increments bas

Re: [Tagging] Drain vs ditch

2019-02-19 Thread Tony Shield
I'm not in favour of combining ditch and drain. My mind sees a ditch as a dug-out stream which may flow into a stream or flow into a drain, the drain being a much larger flow. I see drains as having water flow several metres wide but a ditch as less than a metre of surface flow. TonyS On 11/0

Re: [Tagging] units and notations for depth

2019-02-19 Thread Tony Shield
Depth of water in tidal areas can vary enormously. People using depth for navigation and general use would expect to use depth at MLWS (Mean Low Water Springs) and add increments based on tide tables, I suggest that OSM does the same. Use the tidal tag and perhaps a tidal-range tag, in metres,

Re: [Tagging] Proposed features - RFC - Power and pipeline substations functions

2019-02-12 Thread Tony Shield
Hi I am not at all clear from this as to how to tag a natural gas pipeline and the various equipments at substations, or water or liquid hydrocarbons eg aviation fuel. Is a product tag needed? The assumption is electricity (IEC 601 is purely electricity) but what about other stuff  especiall