Re: DBTags and Memo fields

2001-06-12 Thread Yiyi Sun
ist. Maybe the specific > exception will help. > > - Morgan > > > On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Morgan Delagrange wrote: > > > Ah, that's interesting. If memo fields don't return one of the standard > > JDBC constants, that might cause unpredictable behaviour. Le

Re: DBTags and Memo fields

2001-06-09 Thread Yiyi Sun
other cases, it uses > getString(). This sounds like a driver issue, but I can't be certain. > > On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Yiyi Sun wrote: > > > Hi Morgan, > > > > The memo type is very useful to store the large text. I used to use the > > getString(...) meth

Re: DBTags and Memo fields

2001-06-09 Thread Yiyi Sun
pe. Have you successfully accessed memo > fields with JDBC drivers? If so, how did you do it? > > It's possible that memo fields are not supported by your JDBC drivers. > > On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Yiyi Sun wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > When I am using DBTags with

DBTags and Memo fields

2001-06-02 Thread Yiyi Sun
Hi All, When I am using DBTags with jdbc:odbc and MS Access database, the Tag raises java.sql.SQLException if the fields to be read are of memo type. Any workaround or suggestion? Thanks Yiyi