On 20 September 2010 21:48, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Firstly, what is "behind" the gate differs depending on your location.
> Secondly, the way "behind" the gate may well be reachable by other means
> (i.e. a detour) - it is easy to imagine a gate where vehicles cannot pass,
> but still vehicles are
Aun Yngve Johnsen gimnechiske.org> writes:
> You mean, how would the city council benefit apart from the fact they
> are participating in a free, powerful routable map with loads of
> features? Free worldwide distribution, availability on several types
> of equipment. Software to make ever
On 21 September 2010 08:42, John Smith wrote:
> On 21 September 2010 08:10, Richard Weait wrote:
>> CTs are per account. Active Contributors are per person.
>
> Exactly, you agree to the CTs as a person, which then encompasses all
> accounts used, unless the wording of the current CTs is changed
In Canada the federal government works with other levels of government
to collect GIS information which is then released to OSM etc. as the
CANVEC dataset.
Edmonton, Toronto, Ottawa and Vancouver have released some data as
open and have a number of apps running based on this data. for
example:
h
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:12:03 -0400
Donald Campbell II wrote:
> You mean like in the movie "The God's Must Be Crazy"? :-)
No, the dropped glass bottle was not a Coke bottle, but brown beer
bottles :)
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
On 20.09.2010 21:04, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> Hi,
> if I would write an NGO project for my hometown (Osijek in Croatia) that
> does some specific data collection of some type (like all bus stations,
> all cycle tracks, etc). Do I need some special permission from OSM board
> to do this?
Just fo
On 21 September 2010 01:53, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> I really need so spell it out to them what is the advantage for them
> locally. To be blunt they probably don't care what we did on Haiti or
> other parts of the world, but they would like to know how OSM could be
> used locally for our town. Pr
Hi,
Valent Turkovic wrote:
That is why I would like to hear from cities that are between
100,000-500,000 population on what projects have they collaborated on
with their city council.
[...]
City council doesn't care too much about maps of restaurants, and we
aren't such big city that we nee
Well, the city of Vitoria (state capital of Espirito Santo, Brazil)
allowed us to import their local data, giving a detailed map of the
city. Now it is up to the community to fill in "the blanks", that is
all the data we support that wasn't present in the data we received,
or adjust the dat
Am 20.09.2010 12:02, schrieb Jukka Rahkonen:
Clause 3 in CTs says:
" An "active contributor" is defined as:
a contributor natural person (whether using a single or multiple accounts) "
This aims, I suppose, at giving only one vote for each natural person. How could
this be checked?
In case s
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:50:09 -0300, Aun Yngve Johnsen wrote:
> You mean, how would the city council benefit apart from the fact they
> are participating in a free, powerful routable map with loads of
> features? Free worldwide distribution, availability on several types of
> equipment. Software to
You mean, how would the city council benefit apart from the fact they
are participating in a free, powerful routable map with loads of
features? Free worldwide distribution, availability on several types
of equipment. Software to make everything from local restaurant
guides, to routable map
Hi,
if I would write an NGO project for my hometown (Osijek in Croatia) that
does some specific data collection of some type (like all bus stations,
all cycle tracks, etc). Do I need some special permission from OSM board
to do this?
Second question that I have is, been there been some joint ve
2010/9/20 Dave F. :
> On 20/09/2010 09:07, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> I prefer asuming that a gate is closed (I tag them with access=private
>> in these cases anyway)
>
> This is a bad assumption to have. Just because a gate is closed, it doesn't
> mean your not allowed access.
maybe I wasn't
On 20.09.2010 13:20, Dave F. wrote:
On 20/09/2010 10:31, Peter Wendorff wrote:
Here we come to a great possibility for software to contribute to the
OSM data.
Wherever possible the software should provide a mechanism to add the
data, if needed.
How?
The original point of this thread was th
Am 20.09.2010 13:48, Frederik Ramm:
Hi,
Claudius wrote:
The point is that tags should only accommodate one piece of information.
A gate is a gate, access is something else.
Completely true. If a way has restricted access (and that may be
physically enforced by the used of a closed gate) I tag
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Donald Campbell II
wrote:
> So if you visit lots of places in ?outback? Australia, you get to open
> and close the gates as you go.
> The gate should be closed, and you are free to pass, but have to open
> the gate, pass the boundary and close the gate again.
>
> Y
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
barrier=gate states that there's a gate. The thing about gates, as opposed
to (say) walls, is that you can open them to get through.
Not quite. It's that _someone_ can open them to get through. That
someone does not have to be you, and you might not be able to get
t
Message: 9
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 20:33:58 +1000
From: Elizabeth Dodd
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] A warning about gates and other barriers
Message-ID: <20100920203358.743e0...@mum-quad>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
So if you visit lots of places in ?outback? *Aus
El 20/09/2010, a las 12:33, Elizabeth Dodd escribió:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:21:21 +0100
> "Dave F." wrote:
>
> The point is that tags should only accommodate one piece of information.
> A gate is a gate, access is something else. Defaults cause confusion
> and arguments - we should have a sys
Hi,
I released some days ago the new version of NaviPOWM: 0.2.5 It can be
found on SourceForge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/navipowm/
New in version 0.2.5:
- fixed bugs:
- 2964054: speeds and oceantiles should be loaded from OSM2POWM path
- 2964466: Operator shown instead of name
- 29738
Hi,
Claudius wrote:
The point is that tags should only accommodate one piece of information.
A gate is a gate, access is something else.
Completely true. If a way has restricted access (and that may be
physically enforced by the used of a closed gate) I tag the access
restriction on the way
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:21:49PM +0200, Claudius wrote:
> Am 20.09.2010 12:33, Elizabeth Dodd:
> > The point is that tags should only accommodate one piece of information.
> > A gate is a gate, access is something else.
>
> Completely true. If a way has restricted access (and that may be
> phys
On 20/09/2010 10:31, Peter Wendorff wrote:
Here we come to a great possibility for software to contribute to the
OSM data.
Wherever possible the software should provide a mechanism to add the
data, if needed.
How?
The original point of this thread was that routing software couldn't
distingu
Am 20.09.2010 12:33, Elizabeth Dodd:
The point is that tags should only accommodate one piece of information.
A gate is a gate, access is something else.
Completely true. If a way has restricted access (and that may be
physically enforced by the used of a closed gate) I tag the access
restric
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:21:21 +0100
"Dave F." wrote:
> On 20/09/2010 09:07, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > I prefer asuming that a gate is closed (I tag them with
> > access=private in these cases anyway)
>
> This is a bad assumption to have. Just because a gate is closed, it
> doesn't mean
On 20/09/2010, Tanveer Singh wrote:
> Sadly, it does not run properly on linux. Is there some way to make this
> happen on openstreetmap web page or something?
Hmm its definitely hard to get all the POI's in mapnik . But
Osmarender (t...@h) can accommodate new Points of Interest .
1. See that t
On 20/09/2010 09:07, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I prefer asuming that a gate is closed (I tag them with access=private
in these cases anyway)
This is a bad assumption to have. Just because a gate is closed, it
doesn't mean your not allowed access.
barrier=gate means it's a gate & nothing el
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Alexandr Zeinalov wrote:
> > Is there a way to see all features at lesser zoom. The idea is to print
> > out
> > a jpg map from OSM which has everything written.
> > regards
> > Tanveer
>
> You may use Kosmos or any other OSM renderer with you own rules for this.
Le lundi 20 septembre 2010, à 11:24:28 +0200, Niccolo a écrit :
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 09:01:49PM +0200, arno wrote:
> >
> > > When you have finished, the button is not called "save", but "create".
> >
> > That's on purpose.
>
> Sorry, I was not clear.
>
> I was meaning that the welcome pop
On 20.09.2010 10:12, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
M?rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I prefer asuming that a gate is closed (I tag them with access=private
in these cases anyway) or you have to indicate allowed traffic
(foot=yes, bicycle=yes, etc.)). Why do we have to have a default?
The default should
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 09:01:49PM +0200, arno wrote:
>
> > When you have finished, the button is not called "save", but "create".
>
> That's on purpose.
Sorry, I was not clear.
I was meaning that the welcome popup says "save" button, where
the button is labelled "create" instead.
Thank you!
Hi,
M?rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I prefer asuming that a gate is closed (I tag them with access=private
in these cases anyway) or you have to indicate allowed traffic
(foot=yes, bicycle=yes, etc.)). Why do we have to have a default?
The default should be applied by the software evaluating the da
2010/9/20 Steve Bennett :
> Personally, I think I prefer the default that access is open to anyone
> who could be on both sides. But anyway, could we try and reach
> consensus, and then document that?
beside simple access-restrictions there are also lots of cases where
the gates are open at some
34 matches
Mail list logo
