Hi Goncalo,
GF> Try with "Store external attachments in message bodies" on and let us
GF> know.
Confirmed and fixed, wait for next beta
--
9Val
Current beta is 3.61.
In reply to :
9> Hi Krzysztof,
KK>> I did it. And my conclusion is the same as:
KK>>
9> If you have such messages narrowed, you could send them to me for
9> testing, as I wrote to Goncalo, his messages are perfectly backuped on
9> my system
Try with "Store external attachments in me
Hi Krzysztof,
KK> I did it. And my conclusion is the same as:
KK>
If you have such messages narrowed, you could send them to me for
testing, as I wrote to Goncalo, his messages are perfectly backuped on
my system
--
9Val
On 2005-09-24 (15:26), you wrote:
> I assume you have tried a folder maintenance on the folder?
Yes, I've tried.
> If that doesn't help, you could try to:
I did it. And my conclusion is the same as:
Best regards, Krzysztof Kudłacik
--
pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat!
Hi Alexander,
In reply to :
>> I don't know how to specify the problem... but this build cannot
>> proceed with standard backup of one of my account: is stops on
>> 'sent' folder (~79% of whole process). I returned to 3.51.10 which
>> works well with the backup.
ASK> I assume you have
Hello Krzysztof Kudlacik & everyone else,
on 21-Aug-2005 at 18:45 you (Krzysztof Kudlacik) wrote:
> I don't know how to specify the problem... but this build cannot proceed
> with standard backup of one of my account: is stops on 'sent' folder (~79%
> of whole process). I returned to 3.51
Hello Marck,
> Okay - let's bring this one up again. I just added an "OR" condition
> to an old filter and messages that used to be intercepted by that
> filter ended up in my spam bucket (unfiltered).
> Looking deeper, I find that, starting today and since making that
> change to that one filter
Hello Marck,
Thursday, September 1, 2005, 6:39:42 AM, you wrote:
MDP> They work neither automatically on mail receipt nor manually.
MDP> Can anybody confirm this? A pretty serious bug IMO.
IMAP or POP? Do you have more specific examples?
--
Best regards,
Stuartmail
Dear Michael,
@20-Aug-2005, 01:30 +0200 (20-Aug 00:30 UK time) Michael Schneider
[MS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to George:
>> I've noticed a strange thing. While I tested search, a new message
>> had come. But instead of being filtered it stayed in the Inbox.
>> When I run refilter, the filte
Hi Peter,
PF> Has it been reported that the text in the headers pane is now flushed
PF> left instead of flushed right as in previous versions?
Yes, and it is fixed now
--
9Val
Hello Michael,
> Filters act quite crazy here. Sometimes filters apply automaticaly
> like they should. Sometimes I can motivate them to apply by
> refiltering and in some cases even this doesn't work and I have to
> move mails manually to the destination folders.
No problem with filters here so
Hello Peter Fjelsten & everyone else,
on 22-Aug-2005 at 14:43 you (Peter Fjelsten) wrote:
> Has it been reported that the text in the headers pane is now flushed
> left instead of flushed right as in previous versions?
Yes. Ugly. :(
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 23
Hi Peter,
on Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:43:32 +0200GMT (22.08.2005, 14:43 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
PF> Has it been reported that the text in the headers pane is now flushed
PF> left instead of flushed right as in previous versions?
I think this is intentional, although I also regret it a little. See
9Val,
Has it been reported that the text in the headers pane is now flushed
left instead of flushed right as in previous versions?
--
Best regards
Peter Fjelsten
3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) Pro
~12 POP3, 4 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs.
Windows XP 5.1 Build 260
Gary,
On 19-08-2005 21:04, you [G] wrote in
:
G> This is good stuff !!! All my IMAP problems have gone, and since
G> 3.60.01, TB! works perfectly regarding IMAP... I can't thank you
G> enough on your hard work regarding this... I could not be more
G> pleased. I have run through over 1400 emails t
I don't know how to specify the problem... but this build cannot proceed
with standard backup of one of my account: is stops on 'sent' folder (~79%
of whole process). I returned to 3.51.10 which works well with the
backup.
Best regards, Krzysztof Kudłacik
--
pb _, )\__/( ,_ Po
Hi George,
>> Filters don't work here, too. Even if i try to refilter ...
>> TheBat! tells me, that it searched x mails and y mails were filtered
>> but absolutely nothing happend.
> I can't confirm that. With the exception of the problem I mentioned, I had no
> other problems with filters.
Filt
Good day, Vladimir.
ViP> Good day, Peter.
PM>> Here is yet another example of a PGP/MIME signed message using RIPEMD160.
ViP> gpg: Signature made 08/21/05 16:38:09 using DSA key ID E10774CE
ViP> gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message
ViP> gpg: Can't check signature: general error
I
Good day, Peter.
PM> Here is yet another example of a PGP/MIME signed message using RIPEMD160.
gpg: Signature made 08/21/05 16:38:09 using DSA key ID E10774CE
gpg: WARNING: signature digest conflict in message
gpg: Can't check signature: general error
--
WBR, Vladimir 'insider' Prohorov
mailto:
Peter Palmreuther schrieb:
> HMdB> Not fixed: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329
>
> Which gets more and more important as process in developing
> theoretical attack pattern against SHA-1 is advancing. In February
> complexity to find two different text producing identical SHA-1 hash
> w
Hello Henk,
On Saturday, August 20, 2005 at 5:49:21 PM Henk wrote:
>> On Saturday, August 20, 2005 at 11:54:18 AM Henk [HMdB] wrote:
>>> Not fixed: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329
> Would you be so kind to add your note?
Done.
--
Best Regards
Peter Palmreuther
(The Bat! v3.60.02 For
Hello Cees,
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:06:19 +0200 GMT (20/08/2005, 01:06 +0700 GMT),
Cees wrote:
C> And for those that still can't logon to that page:
C> the direct link is:
C> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/the_bat/beta/tbb36002.rar
Thanks, downloading.
C> wanna know my bankaccount number?
Hallo Thomas,
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 01:47:41 +0700GMT (20-8-2005, 20:47 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
9>> The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) is now available from:
9>> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
TF> Got this:
>> DB query error.
>> Please try later.
Confirmed.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
IBM
Hello 9Val,
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:59:53 +0300 GMT (20/08/2005, 00:59 +0700 GMT),
9Val wrote:
9> The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) is now available from:
9> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
Got this:
> DB query error.
> Please try later.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Laughing stock: cattle with a se
Good day, Wayne.
WH> Since I have not received a clear answer, I will assume that the name
WH> "forerunner" is simply another arbitrary name. Please correct me if it
WH> means something else. Thanks!
They did so much inner changes, and there are a lot of changes
sheduled to be completed
Hello Wayne Howard & everyone else,
on 20-Aug-2005 at 17:16 you (Wayne Howard) wrote:
> I'm still curious what they mean - or is it a secret? :)
I don't know. Maybe they do have a meaning, maybe not.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
Technological progress
On 20-8-2005 14:04 Peter Palmreuther wrote:
> On Saturday, August 20, 2005 at 11:54:18 AM Henk [HMdB] wrote:
>
> HMdB> Not fixed: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329
>
> Which gets more and more important as process in developing
> theoretical attack pattern against SHA-1 is advancing. I
Hello Alexander,
On Saturday, August 20, 2005, at 11:11:24 AM, you wrote
re: The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner is now available:
ASK> Beta versions had those additional names in the past, too. Maybe
ASK> "Pranayama" and "Rush" ring a bell?
Not to me. Then again, I have
Hello Wayne Howard & everyone else,
on 20-Aug-2005 at 16:34 you (Wayne Howard) wrote:
> Since I have not received a clear answer, I will assume that the name
> "forerunner" is simply another arbitrary name. Please correct me if it
> means something else. Thanks!
Beta versions had those additiona
Hello Alexander,
On Saturday, August 20, 2005, at 8:09:57 AM, you wrote
re: The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner is now available:
>> So why name 'Forerunner'?
ASK> Its the runner-up of version fore...four... September 1st is close. *eg*
I have never seen a beta program (other than
Hello Peter,
Peter Palmreuther wrote (in ):
>> Anyone remembers the command line option to give TheBat! another
>> registry entry?
> ,- [ ]
> | Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 20:29:53 +0300
> | From: 9Val <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | Subject: The Bat! 2.13 "Lucky" Beta/3 is now available
> |
> | [+] Othe
Hi Peter,
>> Its the runner-up of version fore...four... September 1st is close. *eg*
> *erm* You're adjuring it, don't you know? *bg*
> Hint: painting, devil, wall ... PLEASE STOP IT!!! ;-)
Some call it meeting trouble the halfway ...
Some call it realism :->
But the name fourrunner - erm - for
Hello Alexander,
On Saturday, August 20, 2005 at 2:09:57 PM Alexander [ASK] wrote:
>> So why name 'Forerunner'?
ASK> Its the runner-up of version fore...four... September 1st is close. *eg*
*erm* You're adjuring it, don't you know? *bg*
Hint: painting, devil, wall ... PLEASE STOP IT!!! ;-)
--
Hello Greg Strong & everyone else,
on 19-Aug-2005 at 20:57 you (Greg Strong) wrote:
>> The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) is now available from
> So why name 'Forerunner'?
Its the runner-up of version fore...four... September 1st is close. *eg*
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurower
Hello Henk,
On Saturday, August 20, 2005 at 11:54:18 AM Henk [HMdB] wrote:
HMdB> Not fixed: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4329
Which gets more and more important as process in developing
theoretical attack pattern against SHA-1 is advancing. In February
complexity to find two different
On 20-8-2005 11:45 Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:
> Still not fixed in 3.60.02.0 most annoying!
> https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171
>
> I use PGP/GPG every day and have to use GPGshell to solve this!
>
> No problem in Thunderbird 1.0.6 at all...
That also goes for:
Not fixed: https://www.ri
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, at 20:59:53 [GMT +0300] (which was 19:59 where I
live) 9val wrote:
> Hi All,
> The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) is now available from:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
> Here is a short list of changes:
> [*] RegExp : The Bat! now uses PCRE 6.2 with Unicode support
Hi George,
> I've noticed a strange thing. While I tested search, a new message had come.
> But instead of being filtered it stayed in the Inbox. When I run refilter, the
> filter executed normally and the message went to the right folder.
Filters don't work here, too. Even if i try to refilter .
Hello Boris,
On Friday, August 19, 2005 at 11:27:53 PM Boris [BA] wrote:
BA> Off-Topic:
BA> Anyone remembers the command line option to give TheBat! another
BA> registry entry?
,- [ ]
| Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 20:29:53 +0300
| From: 9Val <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Subject: The Bat! 2.13 "Lucky" B
Hello 9Val,
9Val wrote (in ):
> The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) is now available from:
Thanks for the ^^^ zero.
> [*] RegExp : The Bat! now uses PCRE 6.2 with Unicode support for
> Perl-Compatible Regular Expressions
Fixed.
> [-] Other: the size and position of memo
Hello 9Val,
> [-] Other: the first ~16 pixels of the columns don't react
I had only noticed this problem with the read/unread envelope when it
was in yhe first column. And yes, it seems to be corrected.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.60.02 Forerun
8/19/2005 4:32 PM
Hi Vili,
On 8/19/2005 Vili wrote:
V> -I suggest to change the string "No message loaded" to "Please wait,
V> loading message" when you have to download a mail from IMAP.
Sounds good to me!
--
Take Care,
Paul
The Bat! v.3.0.2.10 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
__
Hello 9Val,
It seems this version uses less memory...:)) And faster...
IMAP:
- The server side outbox problem that I reported on Aug 6 to the list
and in private, still exists. If you turn Message autoview on, no
problem.
- Start situation: message autoview turned off, using server
Hi 9Val,
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:59:53 +0300 UTC (8/19/2005, 12:59 PM -0500 UTC my
time), 9Val wrote:
9> The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) is now available from:
9> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
This is good stuff !!! All my IMAP problems have gone, and since 3.60.01,
TB! works perfectly r
Hello 9Val,
> The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) is now available from:
Starts up just fine!
--
Best regards,
Richard Newman
---
Using The Bat!3.60.02.0 Forerunner (Beta)
under Windows XP5 Service Pack 2 Service Pack 2
on a Pentium
Hello all,
Friday, August 19, 2005, 9Val wrote:
> The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) is now available from:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
> [-] Security : There were an AV when verifying PGP signatures by PGP
> internal implementation
fixed, thanks.
> [-] Other: the
Hello 9Val,
On Friday, August 19, 2005, at 1:59:53 PM, you wrote
re: The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner is now available:
9> The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) is now available from:
9> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
What is meant by "Forerunner"? Is it a special beta in some
Hello Cees,
Friday, August 19, 2005, 8:06:19 PM, you wrote:
C> wanna know my bankaccount number? :rofl2:
Yeah! Then we all can plunder it! :-)
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using
The Bat! Version 3.60.01
MyMacros 1.11
zOmbie's Macros Version 0.7
Windows 2000 Professio
Het was op vrijdag 19 augustus 2005 om 19:59 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'The
Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner is now available' :
Hoi 9Val,
9> The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) is now available from:
9> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
fires up real fast!
And for those that s
Hi All,
The Bat! 3.60.02 Forerunner (Beta) is now available from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
Here is a short list of changes:
[*] RegExp : The Bat! now uses PCRE 6.2 with Unicode support for
Perl-Compatible Regular Expressions
[-] Security : When displaying certific
50 matches
Mail list logo
