On Wednesday, April 10, 2002, 4:25:15 PM, Lars wrote:
LG> Hi Chris,
LG> On Wednesday, April 10, 2002 at 16:12:47 [GMT +0200], you wrote:
CL>> I have had nothing but complaints about it from folk I send mail
CL>> to, so would like to switch it off. Any hints?
LG> Yes. Go to the "Account proper
Hello there,
Is there some configuration setting, or something I can put in a
template, that avoids generating the Re[2]: format and generates the
regular Re: format for replies instead?
I have had nothing but complaints about it from folk I send mail to,
so would like to switch it off. Any
On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 8:54:24 AM, Dierk wrote:
DH> Hello Marck!
DH> On Wednesday, March 27, 2002 at 3:39:25 AM you wrote:
>> As to whether or not it messes up replying to these old-school lists,
>> I've always found that a carefully crafted set of folder templates
>> gets round the prob
On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 3:39:25 AM, Marck wrote:
MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MDP> Hash: SHA1
MDP> Hi Chris,
MDP> @26 March 2002, 18:34:09 +0100 (17:34 UK time) Chris Lilley wrote in
MDP> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP> Just to clarify
On Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 12:39:07 AM, Marck wrote:
MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MDP> Hash: SHA1
MDP> Hi Chris,
MDP> @26 March 2002, 18:34:09 +0100 (17:34 UK time) Chris Lilley wrote in
MDP> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> I have notic
Hello tbudl,
I have noticed a change in behavior since moving to 1.60 from 1.53
This affects replying to lists in absence of Reply-to headers.
Munging Reply-to headers is considered bad practice:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Which is summarized as
"Some administr
On Saturday, March 23, 2002, 9:05:38 AM, Geoff wrote:
GL> Using The Bat! v1.60 on Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 6
GL> I've just upraded and noticed that the Help doesn't describe two of
GL> the new features; features that I would like to turn off, but am
GL> unsure whether I can or shou
7 matches
Mail list logo
