Hi
On Tuesday 25 June 2013 at 2:11:56 AM, in
, Robert D. wrote:
> It works splendidly well except for one account. And
> that one didn't always have the problem. And ... a
> couple others did and they magically cleared up.
> Needles to say, this has been going on many, many
> months and is
Hello MFPA,
Monday, June 24, 2013, 2:21:06 PM, you wrote:
> If you have separate filters for each account, I can't suggest
> anything.
Yup ! A few email accounts have collected. Whatever "Lists" of interest
to which I was subscribed, stayed with the respective Email Account.
I "move" Inbox e
Hi
On Monday 24 June 2013 at 2:26:13 PM, in
, Robert D. wrote:
> I have one email account where, at start-up, no filters
> work.When I run re-filter on that account, every
> email, usually dozens, will correctly filter to the
> common folders I use for all other email accounts.
> Whereas ,
I have one email account where, at start-up, no filters work.When I
run re-filter on that account, every email, usually dozens, will
correctly filter to the common folders I use for all other email
accounts.
Whereas , all the other email accounts I have will filter when I open
The Bat! ...
I
Batfolk,
I have recently upgraded from version 4 of TB to version 5. I have a number of
read filters which I use to file messages when I have read them, but these are
not triggered when I mark the messages as read manually.
If I set TB to mark messages as read when they are opened in a new windo
Hello Granville,
> How can I set my filters to capture this stuff that does'nt rely on
> the email address or the subject line being identical on each
> mail-out.
I use POPFile (http://popfile.sourceforge.net/) to classify spam and
then in TB I just have one filter that looks for the
"X-Text-Clas
On Monday, July 28, 2003, 7:45:08 PM, Granville Cousins wrote:
GC> How can I set my filters to capture this stuff that does'nt rely on
GC> the email address or the subject line being identical on each
GC> mail-out.
You could use something like Popfile or Spampal, something which looks
at what's c
Granville Cousins writes:
How can I set my filters to capture this stuff that does'nt rely on
the email address or the subject line being identical on each
mail-out.
If you're using a POP mailbox (not IMAP), use POPFile. Then you only need
one spam filter in TB to remove anything POPFile has l
Hello MAU,
Monday, July 28, 2003, 3:23:18 PM, you wrote:
I am receiving masses of spam emails every day through my inbox. I
have gone into the specials tools and set lots and lots of filters to
capture this rubbish. But the next mail-out just comes to me without
filtering out what I don't want. W
Hello Bill,
> Hmm, so '&' is a concatenation operator in TB. Is that documented
> anywhere?
No, it is not and, obviously, it is not documented. See my other reply
to you.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
___
Hello Bill,
>>> If you look for A&B you are actually looking for AB.
>
>> At least I think so
>
> I couldn't get it to work as a concatenation operator. I sent an
> email to myself and filtered for a sender of "bill mc&carthy" (without
> the quotes) - it did not work. Can you provide an example
On Mon 28-Jul-03 7:39am -0400, MAU wrote:
>> It is working as it should because the AND operation is done at string
>> level and you are now looking for the single string
>>
>> "bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>>
>> If you look for A&B you are actually looking for AB.
> At least I think so
I couldn
On Mon 28-Jul-03 6:13am -0400, MAU wrote:
>> If I write, for recipient: bill mccarthy|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> I'll get any recipient that contains "bill mccarthy" or
>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" - caseless.
> Right, because you are looking for string "bill mccarthy" OR string
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and you
Hello MAU,
> It is working as it should because the AND operation is done at string
> level and you are now looking for the single string
>
> "bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> If you look for A&B you are actually looking for AB.
At least I think so
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial
Hello Bill,
> If I write, for recipient: bill mccarthy|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'll get any recipient that contains "bill mccarthy" or
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" - caseless.
Right, because you are looking for string "bill mccarthy" OR string
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and you get a match with any or both.
> How
On Sun 27-Jul-03 6:04pm -0400, Greg Strong wrote:
>> Or he could keep them all in the MainSet as:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> So are you saying in one "String" field in the filter on the "Rule" tab
> I can use the following?
>
> and = "&"
>
> or
Hello Greg,
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 17:04:00 -0500 GMT (28/07/03, 05:04 +0700 GMT),
Greg Strong wrote:
> So are you saying in one "String" field in the filter on the "Rule" tab
> I can use the following?
> and = "&"
> or = "|"
You can (at least I know about "|", never tested "&"). But I find it
m
Hello Bill,
> Or he could keep them all in the MainSet as:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So are you saying in one "String" field in the filter on the "Rule" tab
I can use the following?
and = "&"
or = "|"
I use these in the "Search for" field of th
On Sun 27-Jul-03 5:05pm -0400, Alexander wrote:
> The main set is always "AND". You won't receive an email that contains all
> of the addresses you've specified.
>
> You have to specify the other addresses on the "Alternatives" tab with the
> "Add set" button. It will look like...
>
> MainSet: [E
Hello Alexander,
Sunday, July 27, 2003, 11:05:34 PM, you wrote:
A> The main set is always "AND". You won't receive an email that contains all
A> of the addresses you've specified.
A> You have to specify the other addresses on the "Alternatives" tab with the
A> "Add set" button. It will look like
27-Jul-2003 22:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The main set is always "AND". You won't receive an email that contains all
of the addresses you've specified.
You have to specify the ot
Hello Bill,
Sunday, July 27, 2003, 10:00:15 PM, you wrote:
BM> How about an example of a filter that doesn't work along with the
BM> appropriate fields of an email that it didn't work on. BTW, make sure
BM> you test it at the top of the list of filters so you are sure other
BM> filters are not c
On Sun 27-Jul-03 3:29pm -0400, Jos Klaassens wrote:
> All my filters ceased to work. Strange enough the only filters that
> are still working are the TB's lists filters.. I removed the rest of
> the filters and made them again (made some new ones too) in my 4
> accounts. Tried sender, klud
Hello tbudl,
All my filters ceased to work. Strange enough the only filters that
are still working are the TB's lists filters.. I removed the rest of
the filters and made them again (made some new ones too) in my 4
accounts. Tried sender, kludges etc. Without result. Nothing filters
anym
Hello,
>Yes, it's the right way. The problem is that the default string may
>contain " (double quote, 22H) characters.
It does not help in my case. I reduced the default string from the
recipient (in a mailing list message) to "optacon" (the part of the
e-mail address before the @) and put the p
Hi Ottar,
On Wed, 9 May 2001 23:11:45 +0200GMT (10/05/2001, 05:11 +0800GMT),
Ottar Grimstad wrote:
AGSAA>> Yes, it's the right way. The problem is that the default string may
AGSAA>> contain " (double quote, 22H) characters.
OG> But this should be done by The Bat! automagically I think. It is
Hello Andrey,
Wednesday, May 09, 2001, 8:07:48 PM, you wrote:
OG>> When I think about it, I have experienced similar problems when I
OG>> automatically accept the string that Shift-Control-F generates. I
OG>> always edit this string and take out everything but the pure
OG>> e-mailaddress itself.
Hello!
Monday, May 07, 2001, 11:29:27 PM, Ottar Grimstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
OG> When I think about it, I have experienced similar problems when I
OG> automatically accept the string that Shift-Control-F generates. I
OG> always edit this string and take out everything but the pure
OG> e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, May 08, 2001 at 10:33 (my local time), Peter Palmreuther
presented us with these thoughts about "Filters don't work":
PP> ... btw: you can (surely only if you want to!!!) re-configure your ICQ
PP> to not using the s
Hello Peter,
On Monday, May 07, 2001 at 10:39:46 PM you wrote:
HS>> Well, I create filters i.e. by pressing strg-shift-f in the message
HS>> editor,
PM> Hi Hanspeter,
PM> that's interesting. This shortcut starts my ICQ message center... *lol* So
PM> I won't be any help here I guess. *S*
It is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, May 07, 2001 at 20:29 (my local time), Hanspeter Schaffner
presented us with these thoughts about "Filters don't work":
HS> Well, I create filters i.e. by pressing strg-shift-f in the message
HS> editor,
Hi Hanspete
Hello Hanspeter,
Monday, May 07, 2001, 8:29:24 PM, you wrote:
HS> Well, I create filters i.e. by pressing strg-shift-f in the
HS> message editor, modify the folder entry to where I want to place
HS> the message and press ok.
When I think about it, I have experienced similar problems when I
Hello Peter,
Well, I create filters i.e. by pressing strg-shift-f in the message
editor, modify the folder entry to where I want to place the message
and press ok. I guess I do everything according to the help text. Is
there a way to catch error messages about non-working filters?
TIA
Hanspeter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, May 07, 2001 at 17:54 (my local time), Hanspeter Schaffner
presented us with these thoughts about "Filters don't work":
HS> I read the help text to the filter assistent but I cannot figure out
HS> why all my filter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Hanspeter,
On Monday, May 07, 2001 17:54:59 [ +0200 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'Filters don't work':
Hanspeter> I read the help text to the filter assistent but I cannot figure out
Hanspeter> why all my f
Hello,
I read the help text to the filter assistent but I cannot figure out
why all my filters but one do not work. It is hard to specify my
problem more exactly as I cannot imagin where it is. The charakter
string is correct, the filter is activ, locations are mostly set to
all the header and pr
On Friday, January 05, 2001, 6:04:12 PM, Januk wrote:
> How about separating them into 4 fields with Tick Boxes. The
> conditions can then be added using a single set instead of just a
> single string.
> So the add filter confirmation would look something like:
> Select filter criteria:
> _
On Friday, January 05, 2001, 7:43:26 AM, Syafril wrote:
ML>> I wouldn't want TB to strip out the "name" part (leaving only
ML>> the email address) for me, however, since I sometimes want to
ML>> use the name instead of the email address for my filter
ML>> (some people consistently use
On Friday, January 05, 2001, 8:39:04 AM, Thomas wrote:
> Yes: quotation marks shouldn't be treated as special characters,
> because the real name of an email address is often surrounded by
> them.
Agreed, though it seems a pretty common practice to me. (E.g., IIRC,
deja.com's power search also u
Hello Ming-Li,
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001 at 07:08:50 GMT -0800 (which was 7:08 AM
where I live) witnesses say Ming-Li typed:
> The way TB is doing, while it won't if you just take what it gives
> you, it's very convenient for me to decide which part to strip out.
> But I agree it's confusing to new
I thought I'd comment on Ming-Li's contribution to the list,
sent on Fri, 5 Jan 2001 07:08:50 -0800:
[..trimmed..]
ML> Maybe we can come up with a suggestion for them. The way TB
ML> currently works is it takes the whole string from the From field
ML> and put it there, without checking for specia
Hallo Ming-Li,
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001 07:08:50 -0800 GMT (05/01/2001, 23:08 +0800 GMT),
Ming-Li wrote:
ML> The way TB is doing, while it won't if you just take what it gives
ML> you, it's very convenient for me to decide which part to strip out.
ML> But I agree it's confusing to new users and should
Hello Ming-Li,
On Friday, January 05, 2001 at 07:08:50 GMT -0800(which was 1/5/2001
10:08 PM where you think I live) you told to the list :
RB>>> It is odd that TB creates a filter string that it cannot later
RB>>> use to filter mail, don't you think?
>> I really hope RIT Labs will address
Hallo Allie,
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001 07:45:40 -0500 GMT (05/01/2001, 20:45 +0800 GMT),
A . Curtis Martin wrote:
RB>> It is odd that TB creates a filter string that it cannot later use to
RB>> filter mail, don't you think?
ACM> I really hope RIT Labs will address this very sore point soon. It,
ACM> a
On Friday, January 05, 2001, 4:45:40 AM, A. wrote:
RB>> It is odd that TB creates a filter string that it cannot later
RB>> use to filter mail, don't you think?
> I really hope RIT Labs will address this very sore point soon. It,
> among a few other things, stick out like a sore thumb.
Maybe we
On Friday, January 05, 2001, 2:31:39 AM, Pete wrote:
> Strings: "John Doe"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
As others have pointed out, using only [EMAIL PROTECTED] would work.
The reason is quotation marks in TB's filer strings have special
meaning. It calls for case-sensitive search. So when you put
"John
Hi Pete
Glad to have helped.
> Which of course makes me wonder why the old strings were created
> differently... or am I just getting demented?!
Just keep taking the tablets >
Regards
Kevin
Batting along with 1.49 Beta 2
--
--
V
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001 05:56:06 -0600, Randy contributed this
to our collective wisdom:
RB> It is odd that TB creates a filter string that it cannot later use to
RB> filter mail, don't you think?
I really hope RIT Labs will address this very sore point
Here we go again...
> I have found that you have to manually edit the "strings" to be
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of "John Doe"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> .
>
> It is odd that TB creates a filter string that it cannot later use to
> filter mail, don't you think?
Yes!
Which of course makes me wonder w
On 05-01-2001 at 05:56:06GMT -0600 (which was 11:56 where I live)
Randy Breese wrote regarding the subject of "New filters don't work?"
Hello Randy,
Randy> I have found that you have to manually edit the "strings" to be
Randy> [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of "J
> On Friday, January 05, 2001, at approximately 4:31:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>...
> Okay... the first one is set to filter mails from a single person.
> Let's assume his name is John Doe and the address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have a folder for him, named JD. The filtering rule is as
Hi Pete
>Instead of "John Doe"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> try [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards
Kevin
Batting along with 1.49 Beta 2
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team dou
Hello again!
PP>> Anybody else have new filters - after upgrading to 1.48f... do they
PP>> work?
AGSAA> Yes, I have created at least 3 filters after the 1.48f installation. Why
AGSAA> don't you describe these two faulty filters?
Okay... the first one is set to filter mails from a single pe
Hello!
Friday, January 05, 2001, 12:16:58 AM, Pete P <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PP> I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong but it seems that my
PP> two newest filters simply don't work. Like most(?) TB!-users I
PP> upgrade every time there's a new final version available and
PP> ever
Hello TBUDL!
I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong but it seems that my
two newest filters simply don't work. Like most(?) TB!-users I
upgrade every time there's a new final version available and
everything's been fine until now.
I have two new filters which I created a couple of d
55 matches
Mail list logo
