No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 748053 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/748053
ID: 748060 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Ba
Felix,
Let me tighten the problem definition.
1) I am able to change the name of the interface
2) This interface does NOT come up at boot time.
3) Manually configuring the interface produces an interface that is up and sort
of functional. The host command produces some DNS information but when
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 8/180 (x86_64), 5/122 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fe
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 7/15 (aarch64)
ID: 748023 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/748023
ID: 748032 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL:
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201227.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201228.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 71
Added packages: 15
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 66
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 13.97 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0
On Mon, 2020-12-28 at 22:49 +0500, Nasir Hussain wrote:
> Thank You Adam for correcting me and sharing what actually happened.
Hi Nasir! Your reply is perfectly correct regarding a possible cause of
the size change, I just answered a different question which David also
asked.
--
Adam Williamson
F
Thank You Adam for correcting me and sharing what actually happened.
--
Nasir Hussain
On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:42 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-12-27 at 18:09 -0600, David wrote:
> > Second question: Why did file-version not change ? I assume
> > because no
> > code changed.
On Sun, 2020-12-27 at 18:09 -0600, David wrote:
> Second question: Why did file-version not change ? I assume
> because no
> code changed. Right ??
No, actually. What happened is that someone changed the spec file and
sent a new build, but didn't bump the release or edit the changelog:
http
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 747650 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/747650
ID: 747657 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Ba
