i did
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 8:13 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 08:06 +0200, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> > Works great here :)
>
> Oh, sorry, I should've mentioned - if it works, please give karma to
> the update! I set it to need +5 for autopush, just for safety.
>
> > On Tue, A
On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 08:06 +0200, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> Works great here :)
Oh, sorry, I should've mentioned - if it works, please give karma to
the update! I set it to need +5 for autopush, just for safety.
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 7:57 AM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> > Hey folks! I submitt
Works great here :)
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 7:57 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Hey folks! I submitted an update today:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-cd4d2064ac
> which intends to address any remaining problematic cases of
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194244
Hey folks! I submitted an update today:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-cd4d2064ac
which intends to address any remaining problematic cases of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942443 where the package
scriptlets still weren't enough to fix it. It includes this upstre
Adam,
I just rebooted my fc35 (x86_64) system after installing this rpm and it's
dependency kbd-misc-2.4.0-2.fc34.noarch.rpm.
I'm running this system with nomodeset present in the boot command line. During
a typical boot the messages spew out and then there's a very short pause when a
font siz
It looks like, in openQA and manual VM testing at least, since kbd-
2.4.0-3.fc35 landed in Rawhide, all characters are invisible at the
console. They're actually there, you just can't seem them. To work
around this, downgrade to kbd-2.4.0-2.fc34 from F34. For more info see
https://bugzilla.redhat.c
Hi everyone,
In Friday's Go/No-Go meeting, we decided that having 5 hours between
the completion of an RC and the start of the Go/No-Go meeting is not
the ideal situation. So I got assigned the homework of starting the
conversation about how to prevent this in the future. After all, if we
don't st
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 2:27 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
>
> Hello friends of Fedora,
>
> please see the final version of the dual monitor criterion. This is the last
> chance for you to suggest anything you would like to see inside (or remove
> from it).
>
> "On computers using two monitors (e.g. t
==
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting
==
Meeting started by adamw at 15:01:23 UTC. The full logs are available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2021-04-26/fedora-qa.2021-04-26-15.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
--
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 2:02 PM Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
> Hello friends of Fedora,
>
> please see the final version of the dual monitor criterion. This is the
> last chance for you to suggest anything you would like to see inside (or
> remove from it).
>
>
>
> *"On computers using two monitors (e.g.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 4:33 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
> please see the final version of the dual monitor criterion. This is the
> last chance for you to suggest anything you would like to see inside (or
> remove from it).
>
>
>
> *"On computers using two monitors (e.g. two monitors on a desktop, o
LGTM too
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 3:44 PM Geoffrey Marr wrote:
> LGTM! Good work Lukas.
>
> Geoff Marr
> IRC: coremodule
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 2:32 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
>
>> Hello friends of Fedora,
>>
>> please see the final version of the dual monitor criterion. This is the
>> last
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 2:32 AM Michel Alexandre Salim <
mic...@michel-slm.name> wrote:
> Do we need to explicitly mention that we do not expect different
> monitors to have the same scaling?
>
I wouldn't complicate it.
___
test mailing list -- test@lis
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:32 AM Lukas Ruzicka wrote:
> Hello friends of Fedora,
>
> please see the final version of the dual monitor criterion. This is the
> last chance for you to suggest anything you would like to see inside (or
> remove from it).
>
>
> *"On computers using two monitors (e.g.
Hello!
Have joined also helping out with testing the last Fedora 34 RC testing
ISOs later this afternoon before the final release tomorrow
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 11:32 PM Red Hat Summit 2021 Virtual Experience <
rh-sum...@itagroup.com> wrote:
>
>
> Thank you for registering for Red Hat® Summit
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210425.0):
ID: 870153 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210425.0):
ID: 870083 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://op
17 matches
Mail list logo
