I think having it compilable with RHEL 5 Java compilers is a desirable
option but not critical. I've been actively developing the Java client
for years using Sun's Java compiler, which is free and open source.
I have volunteered to maintain the Java code, so I'll look into this,
but most likely n
fre 2009-03-13 klockan 11:45 +0100 skrev Adam Tkac:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:07:12AM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:50:36 +0100
> > Pierre Ossman wrote:
> >
> > > It seems like the java client was last rebuilt in 2006. I propose
> > > nuking the checked in copy, along w
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:45:12 +0100
Adam Tkac wrote:
>
> If we start porting to newer compilers I propose to switch to GCJ
> as a default compiler because we already have GCC as our default
> C/C++ compiler. Do you have any comment?
>
I have no preferences either way.
Rgds
--
Pierre Ossman
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:07:12AM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:50:36 +0100
> Pierre Ossman wrote:
>
> > It seems like the java client was last rebuilt in 2006. I propose
> > nuking the checked in copy, along with the RealVNC gif in the same
> > directory as there is no ref
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:50:36 +0100
Pierre Ossman wrote:
> It seems like the java client was last rebuilt in 2006. I propose
> nuking the checked in copy, along with the RealVNC gif in the same
> directory as there is no reference to it in the existing Java code.
>
It's now gone.
--
Pierre Ossm
