DAVEH: My latest post is in GREEN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/5/2005 8:54:19 PM
Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH: If you really don't want to continue, John...so be it. But I
would still like to know why you do not consider your
DAVEH: Thanx for educating me on this, DavidM.
Dave Hansen wrote:
DAVEH: Do the religions you mentioned have a similar literal burning
context that is assumed by many Christians?
David Miller wrote:
DaveH wrote:
> Are there other religions (Muslim, Buddhis
David Miller wrote:
DaveH wrote:
> Or could they have been (metaphorically) driven out.
> IOWPerhaps they were a little more sensitive than
> me to the pressure of some to exclude from TT those
> who have opposing opinions.
Good point, maybe kind of like the o
Dave, I am honest with my responses to you. It is not hypocritical for me to
ask for a prooftext. If you asked me the wife/dog question I would answer
"neither...next question". That is a valid answer, and gives the correct
response. You answered that you do not know of any Mormon position with
David Miller wrote:
DaveH wrote:
> Do you not think there may have been at least
> one TT who is eager for me to burn in hell because
> I refuse to accept their theological beliefs?
No, I don't think so, but I could very well be wrong.
DAVEH: Perhaps I'm a bit more
In a message dated 4/5/2005 9:53:34 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wasn't going to answer to these posts originally because Proverbs 9 said to never correct or rebuke a mocker as that will only generate more insults and hate.
thanks for this.
Jd
You're right. Truly sorry about that, Caroline (and
everybody).
Debbie
- Original Message -
From:
Caroline
Wong
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 1:33
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Meet Judge
Greer's Pastor
I'm surprised
In a message dated 4/5/2005 8:54:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH: If you really don't want to continue, John...so be it. But I would still like to know why you do not consider yourself a Protestant. Which of the reasons mentioned in your definition.
a mem
I'm surprised Izzy Googled the word and
thought she found us. I Googled Izzy and found a lot of interesting Izzies but I
won't jump to the conclusion that I've found her. I thought Lance made it clear
that it's an ad hoc meeting of women of various churches/denomination meeting to
talk theol
In a message dated 4/5/2005 8:54:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH: If you really don't want to continue, John...so be it. But I would still like to know why you do not consider yourself a Protestant. Which of the reasons mentioned in your definition.
a mem
Sweetie, you have to enclose the phrase in
quotation marks when you Google in order to conjure only the sites where the two
words actually occur side by side. When you do that, you get zero hits. I
realize that still offers you no Christian content, but at least zero
is squeaky clean.
What
DAVEH: Ahhh Izzy'ave ya bin smokin' peyote again?!?!?!
:-D
ShieldsFamily wrote:
From one of
our most astute communicators,
indeed…..Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, Apri
DAVEH: If you really don't want to continue, John...so be it. But I
would still like to know why you do not consider yourself a
Protestant. Which of the reasons mentioned in your definition.
a
member of any of several church denominations denying the universal
authority of the Pope
David Miller wrote:
Terry wrote:
... the Church for the last two thousand or
so years has been built on the originals.
One foundation for one building is the usual ratio.
I think the Roman Catholic Church is responsible for perpetuating the idea
of ONE CHURCH existing t
In a message dated 4/5/2005 3:29:23 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ignore the ignorant, pls; this post is v insightful, D; (in its intended context) a valuable reference relative to reading/writing email on TT
thank you v much for this post!
g :: tt moderator
O
In a message dated 4/5/2005 2:39:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Debbie Sawczak wrote:
Some things to consider with regard to communication:
A text, whether spoken or written, is not itself a message but only a vehicle for a message. Also, it is not independent of speak
In a message dated 4/5/2005 12:59:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don't want to be a tattle tale but, did you know that the guy who wrote this post and the one who responded both have some of the writings of Karl Barth. Do you think that might account for them thinking that
In a message dated 4/5/2005 9:51:37 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hugs and kisses -- from Bill, not me.
Jd
That's not funny.
sorry - it will never happen again.
JD
In a message dated 4/5/2005 9:48:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John writes > In Hebrews 10.16ff, there is a presumption by Divine revelation -- that sin is only forgiven in the offering of sacrifice. We do not catch the importance of this fact. ONLY IN THE OFFERI
In a message dated 4/5/2005 9:48:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John, this is really good. I don't know if I would call confession, prayer, and repentance "substitutes" for sacrificial offering
Bill,
I blew it and wrote a correction. I meant to say that these were
In a message dated 4/5/2005 8:53:18 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
John had defined legalism in the following way:
>It is the imposition of their interpretations upon others
>and the elevation of their understanding to the status
>of Ex-Cathedra.
David -- here you go agai
Judy, do me a favor and pick one paragraph of thought that you would like to pursue. .
Jd
In a message dated 4/5/2005 1:51:22 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:26:11 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy
The reason why I asked the question; the
In a message dated 4/5/2005 1:58:05 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I never thought they were but each has it's place and "sacrificial offering" in no way negates repentance, confession, and prayer. What about 1 John 1:9?
Judy, what forgives sins -- the single and "once f
We have an earlier post (this evening) that is a much better start than this one. You want me to be a Portestant, no argument. Call me anything you want -- just don't don't call me late to dinner. Let's trash this post -- shall we?
Jd
In a message dated 4/4/2005 10:38:55 PM Pacific
thank you!--this is
one of the nicest things you've ever posted, Izzy
g
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:50:27 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
From one of our most
astute communicators, indeed…..Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 4/4/2005 8:58:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/29/2005 10:00:43 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH: Is this a commonly accepted theory of Protestantism? LDS folks believe such thi
From one of our most astute communicators,
indeed…..Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 4:26
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Fictitous interview with Karl Barth
It seems that the ones most into “relationship”
have the hardest time communicating. J Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 3:55
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: R
Oh, and Judy, just to clarify: I really was talking
about ordinary communication between people. The same factors are involved
in studying Scripture, but supernature does open up other
considerations.
Debbie
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.
Oh dear, you drew a very Murphy-esque
conclusion, Terry! And it of course illustrates the point--I
note a tremendous lack of confidence (cf my second-last paragraph).
Communication actually does happen in
spades--praise be. Lots of people even get a pretty coherent message from
Barth and a
ignore the
ignorant, pls; this post is v insightful, D; (in its
intended context) a valuable reference relative to
reading/writing email on TT
thank you v much
for this post!
g :: tt
moderator
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:51:50 -0400 "Debbie Sawczak"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
So
Did it wake you up Lance? The problem is much
larger than Karl Barth but he is part of it. The OT is quoted
all
over the New. Jesus quoted it constantly -- How
do you suppose He missed the following? Jesus and Paul and all the
apostles missed it. It took the genius of Barth to point it
You've got it Terry - why anyone would take such a
wonderful and life-giving Word of Truth and try to
make it so complicated and convoluted - is a mystery, but certainly not the
mystery of godliness judyt
On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 16:38:59 -0500 Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
In
Debbie Sawczak wrote:
Some things to consider with regard
to communication:
A text, whether spoken or
written, is not itself a message but only a vehicle for a
message. Also, it is not independent of speaker and hearer. In fact, in
any act of discourse, we have to recognize
Some things to consider with regard to
communication:
A text, whether spoken or written, is not
itself a message but only a vehicle for a message. Also, it is not
independent of speaker and hearer. In fact, in any act of discourse, we
have to recognize not only the message but:
the sender
DaveH, I think there are a whole LOT of folks on TT who are hoping exactly the OPPOSITE;
that you will be saved and go to heaven. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005
12:02 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.
Don't want to be a tattle tale but, did you know
that the guy who wrote this post and the one who responded both have some of the
writings of Karl Barth. Do you think that might account for them thinking that
they, along with the 'K-man' himself, know more than Paul? That's not as bad,
mind
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 10:47:42 -0600 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
John, this is really good. I don't know if I
would call confession, prayer, and repentance "substitutes" for sacrificial
offering, but I certainly understand what you are attempting to convey. I
notice s
DaveH wrote:
> Do the religions you mentioned have a similar literal
> burning context that is assumed by many Christians?
Yes, for the most part they do. However, they do have varying ideas about
how long one stays there. Buddhism, for example, teaches reincarnation, so
the person who goes to
Terry wrote:
> ... the Church for the last two thousand or
> so years has been built on the originals.
> One foundation for one building is the usual ratio.
I think the Roman Catholic Church is responsible for perpetuating the idea
of ONE CHURCH existing through the last two millenia. When I rea
Redeemed BUT STILL HUMAN! In THAT way.
- Original Message -
From:
David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: April 05, 2005 13:54
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perfect
Church?
Lance wrote:
> Just as the majority of Christians are
corrupted in some
DaveH wrote:
> Do you not think there may have been at least
> one TT who is eager for me to burn in hell because
> I refuse to accept their theological beliefs?
No, I don't think so, but I could very well be wrong.
David Miller wrote:
> Also, sometimes grieving people who are not even
>
DaveH wrote:
> Or could they have been (metaphorically) driven
out.> IOWPerhaps they were a little more sensitive than
> me to the pressure of some to exclude from TT those
> who have opposing opinions.
Good point, maybe kind of like the other Mormons who no longer post
here. How d
Lance wrote:
> Just as the majority of Christians are
corrupted in some
> way. Yes, I'm serious. Yes, that includes
you
Do you think I am corrupted in some way? If
so, in what way?
Peace be with you.David Miller.
DAVEH: Do the religions you mentioned have a similar literal burning
context that is assumed by many Christians?
David Miller wrote:
DaveH wrote:
> Are there other religions (Muslim, Buddhist or whatever)
> that offer such a belief?
Yes. Muslims and Jews both have tea
DaveH wrote:
> Are there other religions (Muslim, Buddhist or whatever)
> that offer such a belief?
Yes. Muslims and Jews both have teachings about the judgment of
hell. So do the Greek pagan religions. Buddhism and Hinduism also have
teachings about hell.
Peace be with you.David Mille
JT opines > Aside from scripture Jesus
has said nothing to our generation Lance - so where do you go from
here?
What about when prophets, like David Miller, speak: Is that not a word from
Jesus to our generation?
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: T
Dave Hansen wrote:
Terry Clifton wrote:
Dave Hansen wrote:
DAVEH: That seems somewhat contradictory to what Paul described in Eph
2:19-20, where the fellowcitizens with the saints and the household
of God (is that not referring to the greater co
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Myth..
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 3:17
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow
way not " loving"?
'They' are, in reality,
saying/meaning wha
Bill Taylor wrote:
Hugs and kisses -- from Bill, not
me.
Jd
That's not funny.
===
Nothing wrong (and everything right) with hugs and kisses that are
holy. How else would a brother or sister greet another
DAVEH: Don't worry Bill.Nobody on TT is going to think for a
second that you or any other TTer will kiss up to this Mormon boy.
Bill Taylor wrote:
Hugs and kisses -- from Bill, not
me.
Jd
That's not funny.
-
Original Message -
From:
[
DAVEH: Myth..???
Are you suggesting that some Christians do not think, act and behave
this way, Izzy?
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Myth..
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, April
05, 2005 3:17
AM
To: Truth
Terry Clifton wrote:
Dave Hansen wrote:
DAVEH: That seems somewhat contradictory to what Paul described in Eph
2:19-20, where the fellowcitizens with the saints and the household
of God (is that not referring to the greater congregation of the
Church as a whole?) wer
Hugs and kisses -- from Bill, not
me.
Jd
That's not funny.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 12:33
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Apostasy
Dave Hansen, good to hear from
you. We
John writes > In Hebrews
10.16ff, there is a presumption by Divine revelation -- that
sin is only forgiven in the offering of sacrifice. We do not catch the
importance of this fact. ONLY IN THE OFFERING OF A SACRIFICE IS
THERE TO BE FORGIVENESS. That is why sacrifice has been wit
David Miller wrote:
DaveH wrote:
> "I hope you burn in hell" Do you think there
> have been any TTers who've hoped for
such...?
No.
You have to be careful about news reports like this. They often
mischaracterize what was actually said.
DAVEH: I never said
DAVEH: Or could they have been (metaphorically) driven out.
IOWPerhaps they were a little more sensitive than me to the
pressure of some to exclude from TT those who have opposing opinions.
David Miller wrote:
Lance wrote:
> To my knowledge there are no Roman Cat
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave, I do not want to lampoon you...I want to lampoon your belief
system.
DAVEH: Ahha minor distinction.
My wanting a prooftext is not hypocritical...
DAVEH: Really? Asking such a leading question of me in that manner is
a very pointed attack, as I see it.
DaveH wrote:
> "I hope you burn in hell" Do you think there
> have been any TTers who've hoped for
such...?
No.
You have to be careful about news reports like this. They often
mischaracterize what was actually said. Also, sometimes grieving people
who are not even Christians say such t
John wrote:
>>> Are you thinking that Jesus was a legalist
>>> using my definition?
David wrote:
>> Yes.
Gary wrote:
> myth (this is the typical mind set of those who've rationalized JC as
> ~equal to Moses)
John had defined legalism in the following way:
> It is the imposition of their interpr
DAVEH: One would hope so, Lance. However, history is replete with
Christians doing heinous acts in the name of God to assist their
perceived foes in their journey to hell. Were not the Crusades fought
by sincere believers in Jesus? And were not witches burned in Salem by
those Bible believ
They shop in our store regularly. Your observation
does not concur with mine. But, there was more of a 'personal' connection here
in the store.
- Original Message -
From:
David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: April 05, 2005 11:22
Subject: Re: [TruthT
Judy Taylor wrote:
Not as I like it - but what Jesus says
about it. He's either the Truth or He isn't. Sadly it appears His
Words don't carry much weight these days in
some circles. As for DavH's observation - why would you think that
these are Christian ppl Dave?
DAVEH:
Dave, I do not want to lampoon you...I want to lampoon your belief system.
My wanting a prooftext is not hypocritical...I believe that the Mormon view
of this is heretical and that there is no biblical support for this
position, so any scripture you quote would be a prooftext. I want to know
wha
Lance wrote:
> To my knowledge
there are no Roman Catholic
> or Orthodox participants.
Just for the record, we have had both Roman
Catholic and Orthodox participants on TruthTalk, but none of them lasted very
long. :-) I think people in those sects of Christianity embrace
authority and
Just as the majority of Christians are corrupted in
some way. Yes, I'm serious. Yes, that includes youfill in the
blank.
- Original Message -
From:
David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: April 05, 2005 11:20
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perfect
DaveH wrote:
> You said that as though the possibility of a
> perfect church no longer exists, or will exist
> in the future. Is that the way you view it, DavidM?
No, I do believe that there are some perfect churches out there. The
majority of churches are corrupted in some way.
Peace
DAVEH: My, you do have an active imagination, Perry. Except for the
belief that God is an exalted being that has a physical body of flesh
and bone (that houses a spiritual body), which is taught by LDS
theologythe rest that you've mentioned below is pure speculation
and not supported by a
http://www.watchman.net/articles/enemies.html
--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you
ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTEC
Is that because you’re the
entertainment, Lance? (BTW, I Google’d Ontario Babefest, and was NOT
impressed by the Christian content. I think I’ll take a pass.) Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 3:32
AM
To
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:21:05 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On being 'smarter' (your word): No, just smarter
than you. God, in reality, comes closer to agreeing with KB on this
one.
Said by a true
Karl Barth disciple; God is the source of Jesus Words and Jesu
ShieldsFamily wrote:
This
non-Jew, non-Catholic, non-Cult, Christ-Follower sees it this way: The
true Church never was and never will be an Institution or Organization.
DAVEH: Do you have any Biblical evidence to
offer, Izzy?
1
Timothy 3:15
but in case I am delayed, I write so tha
Myth..
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 3:17
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow
way not " loving"?
'They' are, in reality, saying/meaning what you've
ascribed to them.
Dave Hansen wrote:
DAVEH: That seems somewhat contradictory to what Paul described in Eph
2:19-20, where the fellowcitizens with the saints and the household
of God (is that not referring to the greater congregation of the
Church as a whole?) were given a foundation of apostles and p
J
DAVEH: Thanx Debbie. Sin City
is a tough place to spend a few days. May I suggest that a lessor
man (such as John, perhaps) may have succumbed while I was able to withstand
the brutal forces trying to suck money out of my pocket ;-)
And, if notdo you believe they will be tossed into
a physical lake of fire to be physically tortured forever because they do not
accept Jesus as you do, Izzy?
Not because they “don’t accept
Jesus as I do”, but because they don’t accept Jesus as He said you
must. So believing Jesus’ w
Dave (and Blaine if you are still around),
I have been wondering this for a few days, and need you help to
understand it.
The mormon god is an exalted man, of flesh and bones, right? And, he has
multiple (would you say a thousand or so?) spiritual wives, right? And, he
has sex with them (or
Q:When we misapprehend the meaning of a fellow
TTer, just what is going on between Us & them as to words/language? David
Miller is perhaps the best one to reference when making this point. He engages
JS and BT ad nauseum on the smallest of points. He deems these distinctions to
be of great i
On being 'smarter' (your word): No, just smarter
than you. God, in reality, comes closer to agreeing with KB on this
one.
He (Jesus) is THE WORD OF GOD. If, by the by, you
are in need of a paddle, I'm sure that someone on TT could be of
assistance.
On 'feeling the Spirit moving in you'.
Here we go again ... back to the old smoke screen -
"different meanings" - "enlightenment thinking".
There are different 'doctrines' of men out there Lance
but God's Word says what it says as is and
until you are willing to humble yourself and come to the Word of Truth to learn
rather than
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 06:32:42 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Response to my portion:'what Jesus says about it'
(to read:my particular understanding'interpretation of..) Amen by the way
as He was, is and, will be the
truth. That was Karl Barth's point in the fictitio
Firstly, our Mormon 'brethren' will be heartened by
your biblical citation. Secondly, one should always prefer the words of Jesus
(to read Scripture) over KB or DM or DH or LM or LS or BT or JT or JS or CW or
DS. It is the 'meaning' you apprehend through those words that is the issue at
hand
I'm interested in what Jesus (The Word of God) says
Lance, and unlike you I believe He is able to give understanding
in spite of all the complicated issues you have raised
in the past because His Word says "If any of you lack
wisdom let him ask of God that giveth to all men liberally, and upb
Response to my portion:'what Jesus says about it'
(to read:my particular understanding'interpretation of..) Amen by the way as He
was, is and, will be the truth. That was Karl Barth's point in the fictitious
interview.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTal
Not as I like it - but what Jesus says about it.
He's either the Truth or He isn't. Sadly it appears His Words don't
carry much weight these days in some circles.
As for DavH's observation - why would you think that these are Christian ppl Dave? Jesus told the 'sons of thunder' who
wante
The opinion of others when differing with mine,
yours or, Karl's is of course 'flawed'. Isn't that, Judy, the very point of your
various responses to this and other posts?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.in
Is this actually taken from Barth's theology
Lance?
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 05:28:19 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
KB: Likely so, but we are
not God, so that the best we can say is that it would seem so. Hebrew 4:12 puts it that the
text, under these
conditions, is like a dou
OK, 'as you like it'.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: April 05, 2005 05:38
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow way not "
loving"?
Not so Lance, I have it on good authority that i
Not so Lance, I have it on good authority that it is
out of the abundance that fills the heart that the mouth speaks
(Matt 12:34, Luke 6:45) - Discernment 101
jt
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 05:16:42 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
'They' are, in reality, saying/meaning what you've
This is NOT a 'bookstore babefest' and I've not
been present at either of the two dinners.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: April 04, 2005 15:42
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Meet Judge
Greer's Pastor
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Hughes
To: Lance Muir
Sent: April 04, 2005 20:09
Subject: Fictitous interview with Karl Barth
From: http://rclough.blogspot.com/2005/04/interview-with-barth-on-inerrancy-of_01.htmlStudent:
Professor Barth, welcome to the University. I came to g
I believe it was GKChesterton who used the 'wax
nose' metaphor ('The interpretation of any text depends to a large extent on the
kind of commitment we have to its content'). I believe that you Dave, along with
the rest of us continue to exhibit the aptness of the figure of
speech..
- O
'They' are, in reality, saying/meaning what you've
ascribed to them. Their hearts are more gracious than their words,
however.
- Original Message -
From:
Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: April 05, 2005 01:57
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Narrow way no
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:41:18 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 4/4/2005 11:27:01 PM Pacific
Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
these
are presented to us in scripture as subsitutes for
sacrifical offering. "Now where there is forgiveness of
these things
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 02:26:11 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JudyThe reason why I asked the question;
the reason why you can't come up with any scripture in answer to my specific question;
I came up with plenty of scripture JD and
could post many more but it would be a waste of
95 matches
Mail list logo
