Who was the shortest man in the Bible? Bildad the Shuhite.
My dad's (may he rest in peace) favourite Bible joke.
Debbie
--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you
ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do no
Caroline Wong wrote:
. We know
Proverbs is a collection of wise sayings but not literal promises we
get to hold God to. We know Psalms is Israel's songbook and it contains
some pretty raw things said against their enemies and that we're not
allowed to pray or think same w
Lance Muir wrote:
New documentary:'Noam Chomsky-Rebel
Without a Pause'.It is difficult for one NOT to agree with much of his
assessment regarding that decaying system to the south of Canada.
==
Never heard of him or h
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Lance,
aren’t you working at the
bookstore a bit late tonight? What the heck is everybody doing up in
the middle
of the night??? Izzy
Dark phase of
the moon. It has a powerful effect on lunar ticks. :)
Terry
From: Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 03, 2005 10:12
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Book of Mormon and the KJV Bible
DAVEH: Then does it concern you at all to post his conclusions when they may be based on assumptions to which you do not subscribe?Lance
ECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 8:57 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1
in your view now, poetry is the 'simplest approach' to the truth?
On Tue, 3 May 2005 21:16:08 -0500 "ShieldsFamily&qu
] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Book of Mormon and the KJV Bible
I'm nuts!
- Original Message -
From: ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 04, 2005 04:48
Subject: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Bo
I’m not sure that’s something
you should be doing at all.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 3:47
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] RE:
[TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1
Sent: May 04, 2005 05:03
Subject: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] RE:
[TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1
Only for confused
theologians.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 2:56
AMTo: Trut
I'm nuts!
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 04, 2005 04:48
Subject: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Book of Mormon and the KJV Bible
Lance, arent you
working a
Only for confused theologians.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 2:56
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE:
[TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts on Genesis 1
In his course 'Bib
glory.org
Sent: May 03, 2005 22:16
Subject: [Bulk] RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk
Watts on Genesis 1
The lessons it
teaches are true. One must first look for the possibility that each
word/phrase means exactly what it says, barring obvious parables and
illustrations. The simp
, May 04, 2005 2:47 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Smiles From The Bible
Oh, Blaine--I can't take any more corny jokes~~can't you post a warning???
:-) Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTE
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Book of Mormon and the KJV Bible
I both like and agree with some of what I've read
from every TT participant. The operative word? 'some'. Do you not approach TT
in the same fashion. Do you not approach the LDS in t
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [TruthTalk] Fw: Smiles From
---
From:
Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 04, 2005 02:11
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] Fw: Book of Mormon and the KJV Bible
DAVEH: Sorry 'bout that, Lance. Let me try it
again. You posted negative material relating to the
They moult. Like my Sheltie. Sheesh is
right! Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Caroline Wong
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 11:05
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk
Watts on Genesis 1
:-) I have a cat
Not a problem for me. Shouldn’t
be for a poet like yourself. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 8:57
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk
Watts on Genesis 1
k] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Book of Mormon and the KJV Bible
DAVEH: Then does it concern you at all to post his conclusions when
they may be based on assumptions to which you do not subscribe?
Lance Muir wrote:
Presently, I do not.
-
Ori
Depends who does the inspiring and writing; some poetry
is darkness, Biblical poetry is light...
On Tue, 3 May 2005 20:56:50 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
in your view now,
poetry is the 'simplest approach' to the truth?
On Tue, 3 May 2005 21:16:08 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL
@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 5:10 AM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk Watts
on Genesis 1
We had a Maine Coon
for a short time. It was so big it was destructive--as it prowled the
house at night we would hear things crashing to the floor. We sent him
back and got
Sunday is a good day for a humorous scripture quiz Me
Q. What kind of man was Boaz before he married?
A. Ruthless.
Q. What do they call pastors in Germany?
A. German Shepherds.
Q. Who was the greatest financier in the Bible?
A Noah. He was floating his stock whi
in your view now,
poetry is the 'simplest approach' to the truth?
On Tue, 3 May 2005 21:16:08 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
The
lessons [biblical
poetry] teaches are true...The simplest approach is the
easiest way to ..the
truth
-- Forwarded Message --
With hope that nobody who happens to be one of these religions is
offended... Just laugh at the others. :)
Joan
Great decisions made by committee: regarding the simple
light bulb ...
1. How many Charismatics does it take to change a light bulb? One to ch
muck it up by making it complex out of all proportion. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 7:37 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk
Watts on Genesis 1
is the bible's
p
is the bible's
poetry literal..what makes it true?
On Mon, 2 May 2005 21:33:24 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
the
Bible..isn’t true ([if not] “literal”) ..we.. believe it is [literal]?
Does it take “research” to rationalize justification for not believing it
You lost me.
- Original Message -
From:
Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 03, 2005 10:12
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] Fw: Book of Mormon and the KJV Bible
DAVEH: Then does it concern you at all to post his
conclusions
02:27
Subject:
[Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Book of Mormon and the KJV Bible
DAVEH: Lance, do you (agreeing with the author's
assumptions below) believe Jesus did not speak the words of Mk
15-18 as mentioned below?
-
Original Message -
Translation: Lance does not know the Truth
Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lance Muir wrote:
You are obviously operating with the belief that truth can be reduced to certainty. As to some things (this perhaps being one of those things) it cannot.==
Lance Muir wrote:
You are obviously operating with
the belief that truth can be reduced to certainty. As to some things
(this perhaps being one of those things) it cannot.
==
Could you elaborate on th
Caroline Wong wrote:
Hi Terry;
I was surprised when I found out
that hard-core young earth creationists also believed in evolution.
They believe that God created one type of each animal and they evolved
into different species. (ex. one elephant which later became 2 (or
more?)
I'm actually not surprised, Judy. You write with
care and, considerable thought.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 03, 2005 07:38
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] RE:
[Trut
On Tue, 3 May 2005 06:14:38 -0400 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
You are obviously operating with the belief that truth can be reduced to certainty.
As to some things (this perhaps being one of those things) it cannot.Unlike a house of cards mentality (if you
remove one ca
I’d rather not impair it at all.
Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Watts can be correct (or incorrect) and
trusting the Scriptures does not need to be severely impaired.
Coons are
half raccoon! Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Caroline Wong
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 12:43
AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Rikk
Watts on Genesis 1
Hi Terry;
I was surprised when I found out
Presently, I do not.
- Original Message -
From:
Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk
Sent: May 03, 2005 02:27
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Book
of Mormon and the KJV Bible
DAVEH: Lance, do you (agreeing with the author's assumptions below) believe
Jesus di
DAVEH: Lance, do you (agreeing with the author's
assumptions below) believe Jesus did not speak the words of Mk
15-18 as mentioned below?
-
Original Message -
From:
Jonathan
Hughes
To: Lance Muir
Sent: April 22, 2005 21:27
Subject: Book of Mormon and the KJV Bi
uited to North American
weather. The early settlers thought a cat must have mated with raccoons, hence
the name.
Love,
Caroline
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 7:23 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Reminds me of playing “telephone”
as a kid—repeat a message enough times and in the end the message bears
no resemblance to the original. Izzy
I'll shut up now, I think I've used
up my Concatenative Licence.
Debbie
Just as I thought: another Bible as
metaphor thingy. (Just why I didn’t waste time reading it.) Izzy
Since the best metaphor available is
the king/god who builds and decorates his temple/palace and then graces it
with his image (and Watts draws attention to
some of the spe
i'll send
you a replacement license--mine:)
On Mon, 2 May 2005 19:52:23 -0400 "Debbie Sawczak"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
||
..I think I've used up my Concatenative
Licence.
Debbie Sawczak wrote:
Stab at summary (2 paragraphs, 300
wds):
Every language has markers hinting
at the kind of text, what its point is, and what structures to expect,
both in speaking and writing. But these markers hitch a ride on words
and sentences and their arrangement. W
perhaps,
though someone read it 'as is', one could summarize it and
link us to it effectively--thx
tt :: moderator
On Mon, 2 May 2005 08:08:46 -0500 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
[re:] wordy
excerpts. (Too long!)
Izzy
ginal Message -
From:
Debbie Sawczak
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] Fw: NT Wright - Farewell to the Rapture
You too? We can always return
to DV.
- Original Me
Well, you know why it's so quiet on TT all of a
sudden, don't you?
- Original Message -
From:
Caroline
Wong
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] Fw: NT Wright - Farew
You too? We can always return
to DV.
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] Fw: NT Wright - Farewell to the Rapture
Actually, I'm 'b
Actually, I'm 'bout to use up the
alphabet!
- Original Message -
From:
Debbie Sawczak
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 01, 2005 14:19
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] Fw: NT Wright - Farewell to the Rapture
Everybody ne
Everybody needs Plan B!
Debbie
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fw:
NT Wright - Farewell to the Rapture
The NYTimes reported a year or two back
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: May 01, 2005 13:41
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: NT
Wright - Farewell to the Rapture
They take pretty good care of their lawns,
houses, cars, fingernails, and RRSPs too.
I think the imminent and total destruction of the
earth (according to
e not premil dispensationalists
ought to be asking ourselves whether we are doing any better at caring for the
earth.
Debbie
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] F
'dualism' entails
worshippng two opposite deities as equals; e.g. 'any moment rapturists'
pouring money into institutional church/monument/cathedrals to
function as worship art (to worship) in perpetuity (for centuries to
come)
On Sun, 01 May 2005 08:46:36 -0500 Terry Clifton
<[EMAIL PROT
nt: May 01, 2005 09:46
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: NT
Wright - Farewell to the Rapture
Lance Muir wrote:
-
Original Message -
From:
Jonathan
Hughes
To: Lance Muir
Sent: April 30, 2005 18:35
Subject: NT Wright - Farew
Lance Muir wrote:
-
Original Message -
From:
Jonathan
Hughes
To: Lance Muir
Sent: April 30, 2005 18:35
Subject: NT Wright - Farewell to the Rapture
Farewell to
the Rapture
(N.T. Wright, Bible Review, August
2001. Reproduced by permission o
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Hughes
To: Lance Muir
Sent: April 30, 2005 18:35
Subject: NT Wright - Farewell to the Rapture
Farewell to the
Rapture(N.T. Wright, Bible Review,
August 2001. Reproduced by permission of the
author)
Little did Paul know how his colorful meta
An honour, sir.
Debbie
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Torrance
> Debbie, yet again, I stand corrected. Thanks for helpin
Debbie, yet again, I stand corrected. Thanks for helping me think out my
word choices a little better.
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.Inn
> Debbie wrote:>> ... it's transformed
that our bodies will be, not>> "discarded".> > Good
point, but doesn't transformation of this sort truly imply a discarding >
of our bodies?
DS: No. Except in a somewhat strained
sense of discarding "the way our bodies were". It is quite hard to e
No, I am not.
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: April 28, 2005 10:27
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Torrance
> Lance wrote:
> > Am I to understand you to be saying that Paul
> > believed and tau
Lance wrote:
> Am I to understand you to be saying that Paul
> believed and taught what we have come to define
> as 'classic dualism'?
Of course. Are you just now "hearing" this from me?
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, tha
Am I to understand you to be saying that Paul believed and taught what we
have come to define as 'classic dualism'?
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: April 28, 2005 06:26
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Torrance
&g
Debbie wrote:
> ... it's transformed that our bodies will be, not
> "discarded".
Good point, but doesn't transformation of this sort truly imply a discarding
of our bodies? The caterpillar that transforms into a butterfly might be
said to be discarding his previous body. Think about it. The p
Judy and I thank you. J Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005
1:30 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] Fw: Torrance
Why is it, someone asks, that the two best
@mail.innglory.org
Sent: April 27, 2005 14:29
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Torrance
David wrote:
> But this is ultimately what we all should be
looking forward to, the day > when our bodies are discarded for new
ones, built in the image of Christ, > according to his new re
David wrote:
> But this is ultimately what we all should be
looking forward to, the day > when our bodies are discarded for new ones,
built in the image of Christ, > according to his new resurrected
glory.
Absolutely anticipating that Day
(read on below), although it's transformed that o
Put me on that list also Lance!
Lance?
Lance?
Lance?
Where did you go?
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lance wrote:> Take care, David, when saying 'If Christianity> was not...' Jonathan being correct excludes> neither you nor Izzy.You don't get it, L
Debbie wrote:
> I think some of us conservative-type believers on TT
> dwell on God's love for the disobedient because we've
> experienced a severe neglect of this in our own conservative
> circles. Perhaps the other conservative-type believers have
> seen a terrible neglect of teaching about how C
Lance,
I would like to be able to agree with you and Jonathan
about this man's teaching but from where I sit it is downright dangerous. His Good News is all God and none
of us. So is this in line with the clear teaching of God's Word? I
understand he is a super smart theologian but I can n
DAVEH: I think I can agree with you on all you've posted below,
Kevin. That leads to the next question
Is 100% of what is found in any specific edition of the Bible God's
words?
...and, a follow up question to perpend
Is 100% of what God wants us to know found in the Bible
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Debbie Sawczak
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 9:37
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Torrance
Your question, Izzy, recalls one that was asked a while ago,
namely, Why are we so polarized on TT? It's because w
o imply that we could/should get rid of our bodies.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 9:06
AM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Torrance
Why is it that liberal-type believers
only dwell on God
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: GETTING OLD AIN' T FOR SISSIES
A couple in their nineties are both having problems remembering things. They decide to go to the doctor for a checkup.
The doctor tells them that they're physically okay, but they might want to
start writing things down to help
Subject: GETTING OLD AIN' T FOR SISSIES
A couple in their nineties are both having problems remembering things. They
decide to go to the doctor for a checkup.
The doctor tells them that they're physically okay, but they might want to
start writing things down to help them remember.
Late
God is 100% right
God's judgements are 100% right
All that issues from God is 100% right
God's words are 100% right since they are His very words and issue from Him.
The question is where would one find his word? Hint KJVDave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DAVEH: ButWere the translators 100
right,> > and if we believe it and do it that's all we need. God is correct > 100% of> > the time. Izzy> >> > -Original Message-> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lance > Muir> > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2
hieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Sent: April 25, 2005 11:22Subject: [Bulk] RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Caroline's Blog April 24> 100% Sincerity won't get anyone anywhere with God. The Bible is 100%right,> and if we believe it and do it that's all we need. God is co
So what church are you in?Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Jonathan Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: April 25, 2005 08:36Subject: Caroline's Blog April 24> > April 24, 2005> > > the church of 80% sincerity> > The Church of
Lance wrote:
> Take care, David, when saying 'If Christianity
> was not...' Jonathan being correct excludes
> neither you nor Izzy.
You don't get it, Lance. If Jonathan is correct about Christianity, then
please exclude me from it. I don't WANT to be part of it. Or does your
theology give me n
Lance Muir wrote:
DM:Take care, David, when saying 'If Christianity was not...' Jonathan being
correct excludes neither you nor Izzy.
===
IF Jonathan were correct, it would exclude nobody, but that's a big IF.
--
"Let your sp
OK
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: April 26, 2005 11:05
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fw:
Gnosticism
Lance Muir wrote:
-
Original Message -
From:
Hughes Jonathan
DM:Take care, David, when saying 'If Christianity was not...' Jonathan being
correct excludes neither you nor Izzy.
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: April 26, 2005 11:06
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Gnosticism
Jonathan wrote:
> Holy Gnosticism Batman! There is not even a hint
> of Christianity in Izzy's response above.
LOL. Lance, you need to tell Jonathan to study his Bible a little closer.
If Christianity was not as Izzy described, I would want no part of
Christianity. Give me Christ instead.
Ro
Lance Muir wrote:

-
Original Message -
From:
Hughes Jonathan
To: Lance Muir
Sent: April 26, 2005 10:15
Subject: Gnosticism
Why is it that liberal-type
believers only dwell on God's love for the disobedient, whereas the
conservative-type belie
ï
- Original Message -
From: Hughes Jonathan
To: Lance Muir
Sent: April 26, 2005 10:15
Subject: Gnosticism
Why is it that liberal-type believers only
dwell on God's love for the disobedient, whereas the conservative-type believers
dwell upon God's deliverance from sin and victory
om from the flesh
is freedom indeed! J Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 4:05 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Fw: Torrance
- Original Message -
From: "
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: April 25, 2005 19:38
Subject: Torrance
> I know I sent this to you a few weeks ago but it is so good I am sending
> it again.
>
> JBH
>
> “The covenant between God and Israel was
As Kevin says, not the translators of the Pervert Bibles. :-) Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Hansen
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 6:31 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Caroline's Blog Apr
DAVEH: ButWere the translators 100% correct?
ShieldsFamily wrote:
100% Sincerity won't get anyone anywhere with God. The Bible is 100% right,
and if we believe it and do it that's all we need. God is correct 100% of
the time. Izzy
--
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:/
Lance Muir wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: April 25, 2005 08:36
Subject: Caroline's Blog April 24
April 24, 2005
the church of 80% sincerity
The Church of 80% Sincerity was fo
: [TruthTalk]
Fw: Caroline's Blog April 24
I've wondered about this also Izzy; and
100% sincerity won't count for much if one is 100%
deceived as Eve was. Paul was
concerned lest the Corinthians minds should be corrupted
away from the simplicity that is in
Chr
: [Bulk] RE: [Bulk] RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Caroline's Blog April 24
IMO many unbelievers find the absolute certainty of evangelicals rather
offputting. I'm now speaking of some of those areas where there exists some
latitude.
- Original Message -
From: "ShieldsFamily" &l
---Original Message-> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Lance > Muir> > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 7:19
AM> > To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org>
> Subject: [TruthTalk] Fw: Caroline's Blog April 24> >>
>> >
[Bulk] RE: [Bulk] RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Caroline's Blog April 24
> So that's where Sincerity fills the gap? I don't think so. And why is it
> that you SO overemphasize our inability to grasp the meaning of scripture.
> That is not something to major on IMO. Izzy
>
>
Lance Muir
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 9:26 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Caroline's Blog April 24
I've always believed you to be sincere, even when wrong. You do understand
that every one of us is wrong about some things vis a vis our reading of
5 11:22
Subject: [Bulk] RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Caroline's Blog April 24
> 100% Sincerity won't get anyone anywhere with God. The Bible is 100%
right,
> and if we believe it and do it that's all we need. God is correct 100% of
> the time. Izzy
>
> -Original Message-
l 25, 2005 7:19 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] Fw: Caroline's Blog April 24
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: April 25, 2005 08:36
Subject: Car
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: April 25, 2005 08:36
Subject: Caroline's Blog April 24
>
> April 24, 2005
>
>
> the church of 80% sincerity
>
> The Church of 80% Sincerity was founded by David Roch
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Hughes
To: Lance Muir
Sent: April 24, 2005 08:03
Subject: This Week's Sermon
1 Peter 2:1-10 Rid yourselves, therefore, of all
malice, and all guile, insincerity, envy, and all slander.
2 Like newborn infants, long for the pure, spiritual milk
No.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: April 23, 2005 08:06
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Book
of Mormon and the KJV Bible
Do much reading of Atheist sites Lance?Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Do much reading of Atheist sites Lance?Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Hughes
To: Lance Muir
Sent: April 22, 2005 21:27
Subject: Book of Mormon and the KJV Bible
The Book of Mormon and the King James Version (1999)
Curt van den Heuvel
In
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Hughes
To: Lance Muir
Sent: April 22, 2005 21:27
Subject: Book of Mormon and the KJV Bible
The Book of Mormon and the King James Version (1999)
Curt van den Heuvel
Introduction
The King James Version of the Bible is, in all likelihood, the mo
1001 - 1100 of 1582 matches
Mail list logo
