BLAINE SAYS I believe the Hebrew word that was interpreted to mean "sticks" is a word that generally relies upon the conttext for meaning. But it always has the meaning of something made of or related to wood.
The Hebrew word ates is used 300 times. It is translated "stick" fourteen times, someti
DAVEH: Hey Kevin...I don't remember seeing your picture on the TT
site, so I was happy to see what you looked like on the site you linked
to below. THANK YOU. I had visualized you as being quite different.
Now...how about sending DavidM an updated picture for INNGLORY? (For
some reaso
There used to be a secret Mormom web site I could point you too that had all of the guys pictures, place of employment, type of career and names. They took it down after I confronted them about why they had that kind of info sort of like a dosier.
Anyway I have Grey Hair and my beard is very sh
DeeganSent: Sunday, 16 January, 2005 22.48Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
Cut the fables__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
I
understand you have a hatred to Mormonism, but do yourself a favor and don't let
that splash onto the Mormon themselves.
--
slade
-Original Message-From: Kevin DeeganSent:
Sunday, 16 January, 2005 22.48Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon
Related #2
Cut the fables
Come on multiple truths?
The context is Right in the text on the sticks and it is in the words themselve NO O. T. Prophet ever wrote scripture on "sticks"
Ezekial wrote "for Judah" on the sticks Not scripture. try reading verse 16
I don't have to interpret I just have to read more than one ver
Ha! Signs and all, I can see it happening . . . the last time I talked to any
of those guys was during the Autumn Conference, 2003 (?). Someone pointed out
Kevin as being that "big fellow." I caught a glimpse of him, red hair and all,
as he was folding up his sign, but I was driving around
nuary, 2005 10.47
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
I believe the Hebrew word that was interpreted to mean "sticks" is a word
that generally relies upon the conttext for meaning. But it always has the
meaning of something made of or related to w
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Well, don't you want ALL of the TT'ers to show up??? :-) Izzy
DAVEH: Sure I do, Izzy. But I prefer they join in the feast, rather
than make me the sacrificial lamb!
:-)
DAVEH: HThat's an interesting idea, Blaine. But..I
suppose if we
Ahturkey ham...GREAT! :) I'm not one for matzah ball soup, but I can
make it.
We
usually have lamb, matzah ball soup, salmon, and other items...it's a feast for
sure...
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dave
HansenSe
Well, don't you want ALL of the TT'ers to show up??? :-) Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Hansen
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 12:22 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related
Slade Henson wrote:
Sorry, Dave, but we don't celebrate
Christmas. The next Holy day coming up is Passoverwould you like to
attend our family Seder?
DAVEH: H.That is tempting, Kay. Would you like me
to bring a Kosher ham? ;-)
Kay
DAVEH:
Thou
Kevin Deegan wrote:
Hello Dave
Please explain.You left me out in the cold on this one.
How are the Qoutes from the Prophets and General Authorities out
of CONTEXT?
I just don't see it maybe you could help me.
Please provide exampleS
DAVEH: Here is a quote...
This Church is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/14/2005 6:38:27 AM
Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BlaineRB:
Hey, Dave, I was over to Antelope Island (in the Great Salt Lake) the
other day, and I got to thinking it would be a great place to hold a TT
reunion! They have a
myth (in the
available OT lit, the 'gods' are obviously the Prophets therein..while the
WoG isn't elevatg these men, it isn't elevatg anyone--this has
something to do with JCs rage against the machine by which the Prophets were
systematically eliminatd)
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:07:07 -0800
DAVEH: HThat's an interesting idea, Blaine. But..I
suppose if we did it, the TT street preachers would only show up to
protest the event. :-D
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BlaineRB: Hey, Dave, I was over to Antelope Island (in the Great Salt Lake) the
other day, and I got to thi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:23:08 AM
Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Slade Henson wrote:
How
many wives do you have, Dave?
DAVEH:
Just one, Kay.
But
not because JSmith said so, right DaveH? Izzy
DAVEH: Thanx IzzyI don't recall anybody defining it in quite
this way before. Of all you mentioned, I think Judge a tree
by its fruit is most likely the best indicator, though I
suspect many would disagree with me on that.
ShieldsFamily wrote:
But when I have trouble
real
estate agent who reported it to me.
Kay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dave
Hansen
Sent: Thursday, 13 January, 2005 09.55
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
DAVEH: Thanx for your explanation, DavidM. Yesit does help me
understand your/Perry's perspective much better.
Do you know why they would have translated angels or judges as
gods? Does that not seem a little out of character for the translators
when they knew the people were told t
:
[TruthTalk] Mormon
Related #2
He didn't
ask what a Christian is NOT, he
asked what the definition for Christian IS. He didn't ask about Joseph
Smith
and his alleged activities or ideas are/were.
Kay
-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTE
In a message dated 1/14/2005 6:50:59 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
LDS are Henotheists
Is Hugh Hefner a Mormonbeing a prolific heontheists, lao, all these years ?
JD
Shocked
Ezekiel chapter 37, John. v. 15-38
K.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, 14 January, 2005
19.16To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2In a message dated 1/14/
In a message dated 1/14/2005 6:38:27 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BlaineRB: Hey, Dave, I was over to Antelope Island (in the Great Salt Lake) the other day, and I got to thinking it would be a great place to hold a TT reunion! They have a nice park there, lots of Bison, de
In a message dated 1/14/2005 6:27:55 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Perry, some biblical passages used by Mormons do seem nebulous as to what they mean--but please consider the possibility that the meaning ascribed to the passage by Mormons may actually be t
ining two PEOPLE'S
Kay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 14 January, 2005 10.47
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
I believe the Hebrew word that was interpret
day, 14 January, 2005 09.23
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
Pardon me for intervening--Perry makes some good points in general, but
fails to give specifics. He says, "I consider the verses from
the Bible that you quote in support of LDS doctrin
where
COLDER! (But it just might work in August???) Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 8:35 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
BlaineRB: Hey,
Kevin Deegan wrote:
Have we established that unless I join the LDS Church i can not be
saved?
DAVEH: No, Kevin.you've just taken a lot of stuff out of context.
--
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
If you wish to receive
t
Kevin Deegan wrote:
LDS are Henotheists
DAVEH: Just remember that worship only one God.
They have a monolatrous relationship with & worship the "god
of this world"
DAVEH: Then it seems to me your above assertion LDS are Henotheists
is misleading. It seems monolatrism is the belief
DAVEH: Thank you, Terry. I need all the help I can get! :-)
Terry Clifton wrote:
Dave H I pray
for him, though probably not often enough.
Terry
--
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
If you wish to receive
things I
BlaineRB: Hey, Dave, I was over to Antelope Island (in the Great Salt Lake)
the other day, and I got to thinking it would be a great place to hold a TT
reunion! They have a nice park there, lots of Bison, deer, bobcats, etc.
There is the old Brigham Young farm, with lots of antiques showing
nt: Friday, 14 January, 2005 09.23
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
Pardon me for intervening--Perry makes some good points in general, but
fails to give specifics. He says, "I consider the verses from
the Bible that you quote in support of LDS
Pardon me for intervening--Perry makes some good points in general, but
fails to give specifics. He says, "I consider the verses from
the Bible that you quote in support of LDS doctrine to be prooftexts because
out of context they contain some of the words in the LDS doctrine for which
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:04:22 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
must you argue with every word I speak? Give me a break. Izzy
Back atcha on that -- in triplicate.
Grace and unmerited love and patience are the first things I think of. Just an observation.
J
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:36:21 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..nor does it inc a leGitimate 'hermaneutic' (thus far)..the correlation to you
..nor does it inc
a leGitimate 'hermaneutic' (thus far)..the
correlation to your point, below, Pastor, seems like 'beauty in the
eye...'
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:03:38 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
|| 1)
Filled with His
Spirit2)
Walk in His Spir
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005
3:30 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon
Related #2
In a message dated 1/13/2005 8:44:31 AM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL
Hehehe...
Kay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 13 January, 2005 19.45
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
I don't know about Messi's being the only real
that Messi's are the only real Christians,
right???!!
:)
K.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Tuesday, 11 January, 2005 14.19
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
Kay wrot
In a message dated 1/13/2005 8:44:31 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
âOne who is truly in (the real) Christ.â (Not a member of a church.) How do we know if we are truly in the real Chist? Off the top of my head I will say we are:
1) Filled with His Spirit
2) Wal
In a message dated 1/13/2005 7:23:08 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Slade Henson wrote:
How many wives do you have, Dave?
DAVEH: Just one, Kay.
But not because JSmith said so, right DaveH? Izzy
I don't think Dave or his lovely ever met Smith. Was it a temple weddi
Very interesting this talk of plural wives
Any member of the "Utah" Mormons would be EX'ed if it was public knowledge or he publicly spoke of multiple wives in this life. Of course you can be sealed to more than one in the Temple. In the afterlife you can have a harem full.
http://scriptures.l
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Hansen
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005
1:38 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon
Related #2
Slade Henson wrote:
How many wives do you have, Dave?
DAVEH: Just one
But when I have trouble getting a definition from a
Christian (present company excluded, of course!) of Christian, it kinda makes me wonder why the reticence?
And that's just a simple question.
DaveH, since you have defined a mormon, I
will give my definition of a Christian. “One
wh
Hehehe...
Reported or alleged to is very different than a definitive or a
resounding YES, he did/does have three wives.
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dave
HansenSent: Thursday, 13 January, 2005 09.55To:
TruthTa
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dave
Hansen
Sent: Thursday, 13 January, 2005 02.38
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
Slade Henson wrote:
How many wives do you have, Dave?
Dave Hansen wrote:
> Perry mentioned that it was referring to judges
> who judge in behalf of God (I hope I've got that
> right, Perry). But if that were the case, I don't
> understand why Jesus would refer to theos
> (Jn 10:34&35), suggesting a deity to be worshiped,
> to be used in his defense.
Oh,
man...that answer was a disappointment. I thought for SURE you'd have a harem or
something. Only ONE? I thought you guys were supposed to try to keep up with
Solomon!
Do you
know any Mormons who have more than one wife?
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
ShieldsFamily wrote:
DAVEH: Yeah, but with a
little forethought,
there could have been one more (Mormon boy) feasting with you that
day.
After all, I bet 16 would fit much more evenly around your table than
15.
Think about that the next time you through
DAVE
Sent: Wednesday, 12 January, 2005 10.32
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
DAVEH: Yeah, but with a
little forethought, there could have been one more (Mormon boy)
feasting with you that day. After all, I bet 16
DAVEH: My current comments are in
RED.
Slade Henson wrote:
Woops...I just noticed this post. I seem to miss
posts on a regular basis.I'll go to this
shade of purple:
Slade Henson wrote:
Scripture is very clear there are other gods,
I
In a message dated 1/12/2005 4:56:59 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH: I wish I could think of stuff like that, JD. Nice to see Izzy get a jab in the ribs now and then. I'm too timid to tickle the whiskers of that sleeping cat :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a
In a message dated 1/12/2005 4:56:51 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How sad John,
"Unto the pure all things are pure, but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure but even their mind and conscience is defiled. They profess that they know God; but in works th
Woops...I just noticed this post. I seem to miss posts on a regular
basis.I'll go to this shade of
purple:
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Dave
HansenSent: Monday, 10 January, 2005 10.16To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSu
In a message dated 1/11/2005 1:56:40 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do not glibbly accept Dave as a Christian -- it is based upon his answer to a question I asked about Christ. In word (script), he expressed my faith.
JD
A matter of grave concern for the discerning
In a message dated 1/11/2005 1:56:40 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A matter of grave concern for the discerning. Izzy
And you suppose this includes you ???
hTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE:
[TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
DAVEH: Yeah, but with a little forethought,
there could have been one more (Mormon boy) feasting with you that day.
After all, I bet 16 would fit much more evenly around your table than
15. Think about that the next time you th
DAVEH: Yeah, but with a little forethought,
there could have been one more (Mormon boy) feasting with you that day.
After all, I bet 16 would fit much more evenly around your table than 15.
Think about that the next time you through a party! 8-)
Dave, feel free to join us
ShieldsFamily wrote:
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Izzy in red:
JD,
while some of us judge doctrine, your words seem to judge people on TT
.
I find no manner of rudeness written towards, DaveH, and I’m sure
he will attest that he feels quite among friends on TT. Izz
Kevin Deegan wrote:
Dave,
Have we established that unless I join the LDS Church
I can not be saved?
DAVEH: Not in my opinion. I believe there are a lot of non-LDS folks
who will be saved. (And many LDS folks who will not be saved.)
Or am I taking these quotes out of context?
DAVEH: FOLLOW THE PROPHETsounds like good advice to
me, Kevin. If a prophet conveys the word (Dt 18:18 & Amos 3:7) of
the Lord to his people, should he not be followed as the Hebrews
followed Moses? I'd say the problems start cropping up when the
prophets aren't followed.just loo
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Izzy in red:
JD,
while some of us judge doctrine, your words seem to judge people on TT .
I find no manner of rudeness written towards, DaveH, and I’m sure
he will attest that he feels quite among friends on TT. Izzy
DAVEH: Though I suspect I do have ma
Just imagine if you were raised up in a all LDS culture.
You have been told that the prophet speaks as God since as far back, as you can remember.
For instance, while you may have sung "Jesus Loves me"
LDS chilgren learn songs such as "Follow the Prophet"
Here is part of that song:
Now we have
DAVEH: I wish I could think of stuff like that, JD. Nice to see Izzy
get a jab in the ribs now and then. I'm too timid to tickle the
whiskers of that sleeping catÂÂ
:-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/11/2005 9:25:29 AM
Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Izzy in red:
JD,
while some of us judge doctrine, your words seem to judge people on TT
.
I find no manner of rudeness written towards, DaveH, and I’m sure
he will attest that he feels quite among friends on TT. Izzy
DAVEH: Though I suspect
How sad John,
"Unto the pure all things are pure, but unto them that
are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure but even their mind and conscience
is defiled. They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being
abominable and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate" (T
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Perry wrote:
A mormon prooftext. Claim that men become gods, then find some scripture
that seems to support it. This type of activity occurs in Mormonism
because the LDS regard the Book of Mormon and the Doctrine and covenants
to be the prime documents in
In a message dated 1/10/2005 10:07:24 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, some of the brethren at Corinth, perhaps, believed in more than one god but served only one - someone might try reading I Cor 8.
DAVEH: Vs 6...
But to us there is but one Go
In a message dated 1/11/2005 9:25:29 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This IS a discussion group, not an agreement farm !!
John
Looks more like a funny farm to meâIz
That might change when you retire.
JD
- Original Message -
From:
Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 8:25
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related
#2
DAVEH: Like most words, there is more than one definition of
Christian. Some (such as
In a message dated 1/11/2005 11:19:57 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not aware of any pure Christian sect.
I am not aware of any pure Christians.
JD
:)
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005
21:04
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related
#2
In a message dated 1/11/2005 4:43:53 PM Pacific
Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes
In a message dated 1/11/2005 4:43:53 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeff Powers wrote:
>Terry,
>I'll give ya that one, but remember paybacks are coming!
>Jeff
>
>
>
>
>>My mistake Jeff. I did not realize that you were a slow learner.
>>Sorry.
>>Terry
>>
In a message dated 1/11/2005 8:28:58 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
He asked for people's def
In a message dated 1/11/2005 7:47:55 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think when Parry used the term "Smithism," he was referring to the
doctrines of Joseph Smith, not John Smithson. :-)
Yes -- you are correct, Sir !! I have taken care of that..my mistake. I ten
Thank you for the temporary mercy. :-)
Terry
Jeff Powers wrote:
Terry,
I'll give ya that one, but remember paybacks are coming!
Jeff
My mistake Jeff. I did not realize that you were a slow learner.
Sorry.
Terry
-
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 14:07
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
My mistake Jeff. I did not realize that you were a slow learner. Sorry.
Terry
Jef
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005
2:12 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon
Related #2
David Miller wrote:
I am not aware of any pure Christian sect. Peace be with
David Miller wrote:
I am not aware of any pure Christian sect.
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
===
I am planning on starting one as soon as I can find time. Keep those
love offerings pouring in. We need a building fund ( and a yacht).
Terry
My mistake Jeff. I did not realize that you were a slow learner. Sorry.
Terry
Jeff Powers wrote:
Wrong Terry,
I have had the pleasure of dealing with Mormans for many, many years.
Also a few
ubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
Kay wrote:
> Geez, we went from dangerous to
> evlBetter watch it, Johnny-Boy
> we just may eat Pentecostals for snacks! :)
I hope you did not perceive me to be calling Messianics dangerous. My
position is that the Messianic move
Kay wrote:
> Geez, we went from dangerous to
> evlBetter watch it, Johnny-Boy
> we just may eat Pentecostals for snacks! :)
I hope you did not perceive me to be calling Messianics dangerous. My
position is that the Messianic movement is of God, but there are some within
Yes, I
know. As am Iwe would not eat Pentecostals for snacksUNCLEAN! UNCLEAN!
Sorry, but Pentecostals just aren't koshernot for food consumption
anyhow!
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent:
In a message dated 1/11/2005 10:43:09 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Geez, we went from dangerous to evlBetter watch it, Johnny-Boy we just may eat Pentecostals for snacks! :)
AND, as Pentecostal so often do, we will be raised to fight another day.
I do not glibbly accept Dave as a Christian -- it is based upon his
answer to a question I asked about Christ. In word (script), he
expressed my faith.
JD
A matter
of grave concern for the discerning. Izzy
Benny
HindEnd...too funny.
I
don't think the Jews of the first church called themselves Christians. I believe
they called themselves...Derechimfollowers of the way.
Geez,
we went from dangerous to evlBetter watch it, Johnny-Boy
we just may eat Pentecostals fo
: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
OK OK
What do you think?
If I accept DAVEH as a Christian do you think he would accept me as a Mormon?
The fat man is smilen once again? (that would be me)
In a message dated 1/11/2005 5:19:54 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So then what is your purpose in looking "to" the heart?
How is looking to the heart accomplished?
The scripture does not say you can look to the heart as long as you judge not.
It says men look on the ou
In a message dated 1/11/2005 5:13:28 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK OK
What do you think?
If I accept DAVEH as a Christian do you think he would accept me as a Mormon?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/10/2005 11:51:25 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PR
uesday, 11 January, 2005
12.58To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE:
[TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
He’s had it before.
Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Slade
HensonSent: Tuesday, January
11, 2005 10:22 AMTo:
He’s had it before. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005
10:22 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Mormon
Related #2
He asked for people's definition of
Christian. I
nuary, 2005
11.03To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE:
[TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
Kay, in the past nine
years this has been explained to DaveH “ad nauseum”. It’s a ploy.
Why don’t YOU try to get through to him? Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[
@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Mormon
Related #2
He didn't ask what a Christian is NOT, he
asked what the definition for Christian IS. He didn't ask about Joseph Smith
and his alleged activities or ideas are/were.
Kay
-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Powers
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 4:42 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
Wrong Terry,
I have had the pleasure of dealing with Mormans for many, many years.
Also a
few Jehovah's Witnesses! In fact my
John signed off:
> John -- Founder and Happy host to the
> Theology known as Smithism.
> Thanks Pairy
I think when Parry used the term "Smithism," he was referring to the
doctrines of Joseph Smith, not John Smithson. :-)
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
--
"Let your speech be alw
FamilySent: Tuesday, 11 January, 2005
10.32To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE:
[TruthTalk] Mormon Related #2
DaveH, You are simply
straining at gnats to avoid the obvious. Here’s what is Christian IS
NOT: a believer in multiple-gods, or that Jesus is just another one of us
Dave,
Have we established that unless I join the LDS Church
I can not be saved?
Or am I taking these quotes out of context?
I do not:
exclude by definition
exclude by creed
ad nauseam
For more of this Nauseam read Stephen Robinson's book
--- Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Kevi
Izzy in red:
JD,
while some of us judge doctrine, your words seem to judge people on TT .
I find no manner of rudeness written towards, DaveH, and I’m sure
he will attest that he feels quite among friends on TT. Izzy
DAVEH: Though I suspect I do have many friends
on TT, I failed
mormonism’s false claims to Christianity. Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Hansen
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005
1:06 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormon
Related #2
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Several on this list
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
