On May 8, 5:37�pm, Ed Dravecky wrote:
> Maybe wrote:
> > It is a two piece meal and not just two pieces of chicken.
>
> Which is currently on offer, based on the ad I saw just now, for
> $3.99. �I love saving four bucks as much as the next guy but this is a
> ridiculous level of angst for four b
Maybe wrote:
> It is a two piece meal and not just two pieces of chicken.
Which is currently on offer, based on the ad I saw just now, for
$3.99. I love saving four bucks as much as the next guy but this is a
ridiculous level of angst for four bucks. I just thank goodness that
Oprah didn't tea
- Original Message -
From: David Bruggeman
>I disagree with a couple of Ebert's points in his review (generally
>positive, 3.5 out of 5), one I won't mention as it's sort of plot-centric.
>He seems to think the flash and bang pushed out the more message-oriented
>parts of Trek, I thin
On May 7, 1:46�pm, "dsik...@yahoo.com" wrote:
> On May 7, 12:52�pm, scruffy wrote:
>
> > there's comedy gold in the 5000+ comments on ms o's site. i guess in �
> > 2009 the allure of 2 free pieces of chicken is a matter of utmost �
> > importance to some people.
>
> I think that, as a make-good,
On May 7, 12:52 pm, scruffy wrote:
> there's comedy gold in the 5000+ comments on ms o's site. i guess in
> 2009 the allure of 2 free pieces of chicken is a matter of utmost
> importance to some people.
I think that, as a make-good, she should work out a deal with KFC to
give away free ch
On May 7, 2009, at 2:05 PM, M-D November wrote:
> The coupon itself isn't a hoax, although the PDF version on Oprah's
> site is just a sample. You have to install some application ("Coupon
> Creator", I think) to get the actual coupons. A lot of people weren't
> understanding that and took the
I enjoyed it very much. It's not a perfect film, but its problems aren't
fatal. In the top third of Trek movies.
FWIW, long time fan (from 1981). Didn't think they needed to make this film
when I first heard about it, Nimoy's support persuaded me not to reject it, and
the early promos convin
The coupon itself isn't a hoax, although the PDF version on Oprah's
site is just a sample. You have to install some application ("Coupon
Creator", I think) to get the actual coupons. A lot of people weren't
understanding that and took the samples to KFC, resulting in Chicken
FAIL.
On May 7, 9:0
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:02 PM, David Bruggeman wrote:
> I didn't bother with the coupon and just had some for a late dinner on the
> way back from a Star Trek screening. While the chicken was cooked fine and
> all, there was nothing distinctively KFC (or "KGC") about it. Certainly not
> worth
When Scott sent me a PDF of the coupon, I thought it was a hoax and
told him so. He sent me several web links that seemed to prove that
it isn't. So I admitted to him that while the coupon isn't a hoax,
Oprah still is...
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
TV or Not TV Sma
At 09:08 AM 5/7/2009, you wrote:
>When Scott sent me a PDF of the coupon, I thought it was a hoax and
>told him so. He sent me several web links that seemed to prove that
>it isn't. So I admitted to him that while the coupon isn't a hoax,
>Oprah still is...
So I shouldn't worry about this new
I didn't bother with the coupon and just had some for a late dinner on the way
back from a Star Trek screening. While the chicken was cooked fine and all,
there was nothing distinctively KFC (or "KGC") about it. Certainly not worth
this kind of fuss.
David
M-D November, to moi:
>
> It's like a rerun of the Popeye's debacle from last month.
> Just sit back and enjoy the show.
Or go eat something else. :-P
--
BOB
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
TV or Not TV Smart (TV) People on Ice!
You received this message because you
It's like a rerun of the Popeye's debacle from last month. Just sit
back and enjoy the show.
On May 6, 10:11 pm, Bob in Jersey wrote:
> =New York= magazine: O touts a free online coupon for Kentucky Grilled
> Chicken, which some people are *still* trying to obtain today (6)...
>
> http://nymag.
14 matches
Mail list logo
