Thanks Mark, but as I said, we need to fetch more complex feeds to. So
we'll use the OR with the simple query, and then query the search API
with the complex query to see if a given tweet matches what we need!
Julien
On Dec 8, 12:55 am, Mark McBride wrote:
> Note that search API whitelisting is
Note that search API whitelisting is different from regular API
whitelisting, and getting a 20k hour limit there is much more
restrictive.
I still haven't seen a case where you couldn't do the matching on your
side. As John says, with the streaming API right now you can only
match simple terms, s
Hum... ok... sad, but I have an idea. Please tell me if this is
stupid.
So, for each tweet I receive, I know what searches it _may_ match.
Right?
So, with all these "candidates" query, what I can do is perform them
against the regular search API (as long as they're complex). If the
result from the
This could only make sense if the Streaming API supported "search engine
logic". Currently Streaming only supports keyword matching -- you have to
post-process to add additional predicate operators beyond OR. You can
reproduce the keyword match in a few lines of code, and the rest is
(currently) al
Thanks Dave,
I think I get it from your example... yet, in our case, we have
several thousands of keywords, and many many complex searches (with
filter:, "and", "or", :near ... an so on).
I keep thinking that instead of re-implementing on my side the search
engine logic that Twitter has, it would
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 03:12:05PM -0800, Julien wrote:
> Well, then I'd need some help with that...
>
> Again, it's easy with single search keywords, but I haven't found a
> solution for combined searches like twitter+stream or photo+Paris...
> because I would have to compare each combination of
Well, then I'd need some help with that...
Again, it's easy with single search keywords, but I haven't found a
solution for combined searches like twitter+stream or photo+Paris...
because I would have to compare each combination of tokens in the
tweet...
Can someone give more details.
I am not s
