[Bug 355112] Re: Ask.com keeps being re-added to Firefox search bar after updates

2011-03-11 Thread jettero
@chris, fair enough. To be honest, I haven't seen the bug in years anyway. I simply removed "ubufox" and it was problem solved on my end. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355112 Title:

[Bug 355112] Re: Ask.com keeps being re-added to Firefox search bar after updates

2011-03-11 Thread jettero
@sebastian, it really is all of that. What really bothers me most is that I've been following this bug for more than a year now. Is there nobody at canonical capable of fixing minor bugs? Do they even fix bugs or do they just wait for them to roll in from Debian? -- You received this bug notif

[Bug 573197] Re: Sawfish-ui terminates when when showing appearance settings

2010-09-07 Thread jettero
... could we not also modify the sawfish-ui source to change gtk- preview-new to GtkColorButton? I vimed around in the /usr/share/sawfish/1.3.5.2/lisp/sawfish/ui/main.jlc and /usr/bin/sawfish-ui files but I don't see those commands anywhere. I don't know enough lisp to get much further without

[Bug 591529] Re: window list restore current desktop instead restores to native

2010-06-21 Thread jettero
Oh, apparently I can just change that. -- window list restore current desktop instead restores to native https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591529 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@list

[Bug 591529] Re: window list restore current desktop instead restores to native

2010-06-21 Thread jettero
Is there a way to get this status changed back from invalid? I'm having a hard time understanding what the problem is here. ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- window list restore current desktop instead restores to native https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/5

[Bug 591529] Re: window list restore current desktop instead restores to native

2010-06-19 Thread jettero
I see this is still marked invalid, although it's clearly an actual bug. -- window list restore current desktop instead restores to native https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591529 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-

[Bug 591529] Re: window list restore current desktop instead restores to native

2010-06-10 Thread jettero
I don't understand the motivation behind un-marking the duplicate status but leaving it marked invalid... -- window list restore current desktop instead restores to native https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591529 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

[Bug 591529] Re: window list restore current desktop instead restores to native

2010-06-10 Thread jettero
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 216049 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216049 Specifically, "just flash and do nothing" is clearly a very different bug than "restore to native workspace [instead]". -- window list restore current desktop instead restores to native https://bugs.launchpa

[Bug 216049] Re: window list restore to current workspace does not work

2010-06-09 Thread jettero
I have reported a related bug (which was incorrectly marked a duplicate of this): 591529 -- window list restore to current workspace does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216049 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 591529] Re: window list restore current desktop instead restores to native

2010-06-09 Thread jettero
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 216049 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216049 Not only is it not a duplicate, I actually referenced the bug you claim it is a duplicate of. Please read the bug report. -- window list restore current desktop instead restores to native https://bugs.launc

[Bug 591529] Re: window list restore current desktop instead restores to native

2010-06-08 Thread jettero
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49984126/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "GConfNonDefault.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49984127/GConfNonDefault.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49984128/ProcMaps.txt

[Bug 591529] [NEW] window list restore current desktop instead restores to native

2010-06-08 Thread jettero
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-panel http://library.gnome.org/users/user-guide/2.29/windowlist.html.en The various help documents and the preferences window for the window list panel applet both state that "Restore to current workspace Select this option to restore a window fr

[Bug 348873] Re: Very large tracking (letter spacing) in Gnome Terminal

2010-06-07 Thread jettero
Here's a screenshot of the 10.04 gnome-terminal using the same font as the 8.04 gnome-terminal. ** Attachment added: "irritating-font-issue.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49816926/irritating-font-issue.png -- Very large tracking (letter spacing) in Gnome Terminal https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 348873] Re: Very large tracking (letter spacing) in Gnome Terminal

2010-06-07 Thread jettero
I'm still affected by this over a year later... has there been any progress on this? It may not be a gnome-terminal bug, but it's certainly affecting my gnome terminals. I've actually made a /usr/local/gt install of an ubuntu 8.04 gnome-terminal (and pango and vte and cairo, et al) so I can get m

[Bug 161953] Re: Samsung UpStage Phone USB Mass Storage not accessible

2008-10-21 Thread jettero
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 173429 cant plugin usb camera, udev problem -- Samsung UpStage Phone USB Mass Storage not accessible https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/161953 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 86685] Re: neo_cgi.so: undefined symbol: Py_InitModule4

2008-05-21 Thread jettero
I snagged the source with 'apt-get source clearsilver', but I found that adding the /usr/bin/python2.5 to the Makefile had no effect. This is probably because my rules.mk, which is generated by debian/rules, was still finding python2.4. I added --with-python=/usr/bin/python2.5 to the rules file a