[Bug 2070443] Re: SRU: Fix critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4

2024-09-23 Thread Gleb
If my check not enough please revert my tag change -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070443 Title: SRU: Fix critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4 To manage notifications about

[Bug 2070443] Re: SRU: Fix critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4

2024-09-23 Thread Gleb
Test locally on Kubuntu 24.04.1 with test plan above Version berofe 6.7.2-1ubuntu2 hg verify before commit - all right hg verify after commit - 3 errors Enable proposed in software-properties-gtk sudo apt update sudo apt install mercurial/noble-proposed Installed 6.7.2-1ubuntu2.2 over 6.7.2-1ubu

[Bug 2070443] Re: SRU: Fix critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4

2024-09-19 Thread Robie Basak
So this failed to build. I know Dave is working on it, but just a note that the call for testing above is invalid. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070443 Title: SRU: Fix critical regr

[Bug 2070443] Re: SRU: Fix critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4

2024-09-18 Thread Robie Basak
Hello Gleb, or anyone else affected, Accepted mercurial into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mercurial/6.7.2-1ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https:

[Bug 2070443] Re: SRU: Fix critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4

2024-09-15 Thread Robie Basak
Following on from the xz-utils code injection, it's clearly critical to validate binary blobs, so I tried to do that and am recording what I found here. https://lists.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial- packaging/2024-August/000737.html is the best validation I could find for mercurial-6.8.1.ta

[Bug 2070443] Re: SRU: Fix critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4

2024-09-13 Thread Dave Jones
** Changed in: mercurial (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070443 Title: SRU: Fix critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4 T

[Bug 2070443] Re: SRU: Fix critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4

2024-09-05 Thread Dave Jones
Urgh ... one of the required patches includes a binary for the test suite. So, that's going to be fun to include. However, I don't see any (simple) way around it given current versions of mercurial apparently don't even produce the type of changelog necessary to demonstrate the corruption. ** Desc

[Bug 2070443] Re: SRU: Fix critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4

2024-09-05 Thread Dave Jones
I'll take a look, and see if I can put a minimal patchset together. ** Changed in: mercurial (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dave Jones (waveform) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 2070443] Re: SRU: Fix critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4

2024-09-05 Thread Matthias Klose
I am not working on this. Sorry, I don't see the time efforts worth the benefit. If somebody is fixing this, please also fix LP: #2076152, or we will have two competing SRUs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs

Re: [Bug 2070443] Re: SRU: Fix critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4

2024-09-05 Thread UweBrauer
Ok thanks for the clarification Sent from my iPhone > On 5 Sep 2024, at 18:41, Robie Basak <2070...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > > Sorry, I think you misunderstand. My comments were aimed at the Ubuntu > developer who prepared an update that was not acceptable for the reasons > I gave. My invol

[Bug 2070443] Re: SRU: Fix critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4

2024-09-05 Thread Robie Basak
Sorry, I think you misunderstand. My comments were aimed at the Ubuntu developer who prepared an update that was not acceptable for the reasons I gave. My involvement was as a reviewer to uphold quality standards within Ubuntu which apply to any change we make in stable Ubuntu releases. This is nec

Re: [Bug 2070443] Re: SRU: Fix critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4

2024-09-05 Thread UweBrauer
>>> "RB" == Robie Basak <2070...@bugs.launchpad.net> writes: > We can bump Mercurial up to 6.7.4 in Ubuntu 24.04. However, this > requires someone to take one of the following three paths. See > https://canonical-sru-docs.readthedocs- > hosted.com/en/latest/reference/requirements/#new-upstream-mic

[Bug 2070443] Re: SRU: Fix critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4

2024-09-04 Thread Robie Basak
We can bump Mercurial up to 6.7.4 in Ubuntu 24.04. However, this requires someone to take one of the following three paths. See https://canonical-sru-docs.readthedocs- hosted.com/en/latest/reference/requirements/#new-upstream-microreleases 1. If all changes being made are acceptable under normal S

[Bug 2070443] Re: SRU: Fix critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4

2024-09-03 Thread Matthias Klose
** Summary changed: - Critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4 + SRU: Fix critical regression in Mercurial 6.7.x < 6.7.4 ** Description changed: From mailing list mercurial-packag...@mercurial-scm.org: Hello all, Monday evening we got a report from a user about a critical bug t