[Bug 999755] Re: Kernel crash on EC2 & VirtualBox

2012-05-29 Thread Stefan Bader
So with those exact steps I managed to crash a real dual-core machine. So we can rule out any virtualization. This merely is related to whatever that command does and likely having more than one cpu. (It also worked / crashed on a local xen guest, so I can reproduce things locally). Next step will

[Bug 999755] Re: Kernel crash on EC2 & VirtualBox

2012-05-29 Thread Stefan Bader
Bugger, I made the severity of the messages too low... :/ If at all they might be in /var/log/syslog on instance reboot... I better make a better version. But its interesting that this appears on a completely different virtualization platform. I wonder whether it could even appear on real hardware.

[Bug 999755] Re: Kernel crash on EC2 & VirtualBox

2012-05-28 Thread Gavin Heavyside
And another one from the debug kernel on EC2, with a slightly different call stack: [ 4389.480352] [ cut here ] [ 4389.480884] kernel BUG at /home/smb/precise-amd64/ubuntu-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c:1239! [ 4389.480894] invalid opcode: [#1] SMP [ 4389.480902] CPU 0 [ 4

[Bug 999755] Re: Kernel crash on EC2 & VirtualBox

2012-05-28 Thread Karl Matthias
We have had a crash with Stefan's debugging kernel running. Here is the output (doesn't look like it contains any more information). [248587.286290] [ cut here ] [248587.286765] kernel BUG at /home/smb/precise-amd64/ubuntu-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c:1239! [248587.286775] inv

[Bug 999755] Re: Kernel crash on EC2 & VirtualBox

2012-05-28 Thread Gavin Heavyside
And we've just reproduced on EC2 with the debug kernel: [248587.286290] [ cut here ] [248587.286765] kernel BUG at /home/smb/precise-amd64/ubuntu-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c:1239! [248587.286775] invalid opcode: [#1] SMP [248587.286783] CPU 0 [248587.286786] Modules lin

[Bug 999755] Re: Kernel crash on EC2 & VirtualBox

2012-05-28 Thread Gavin Heavyside
We've got small EC2 instances (single processor) that haven't exhibited this behaviour, but we get it with large EC2 instances (2 CPUs); the VirtualBox machine I just reproduced it with was specifically set to 2 CPUS. It seems to me that this bug might only occur on multi-cpu boxes? ** Summary ch