Re: [Bug 327703] Re: DHCP Request Cycle can get caught in infinite loop

2009-06-04 Thread Simon Kelley
Thierry Carrez wrote: > Simon: > Good news. Do you plan to push that release to Debian soon ? > It went last night, so should be in unstable very soon, if not already. Cheers, Simon. -- DHCP Request Cycle can get caught in infinite loop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327703 You received this

[Bug 327703] Re: DHCP Request Cycle can get caught in infinite loop

2009-06-04 Thread Simon Kelley
2.48 release is now available and includes the fix for this bug. Cheers, Simon. -- DHCP Request Cycle can get caught in infinite loop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327703 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bug

[Bug 242869] Re: dnsmasq's dhcp blocked to clients by firestarter

2009-03-14 Thread Simon Kelley
A useful bit of information here: ISC dhcpd uses raw sockets to grab incoming packets before they pass through the IP stack and IP tables, it therefore doesn't suffer from problems caused by broken firewall rules. Dnsmasq uses standard IP sockets so that all incoming packets are filtered by iptable

[Bug 327703] Re: DHCP Request Cycle can get caught in infinite loop

2009-03-11 Thread Simon Kelley
I think I've deduced what is happening here. The combination of the dhcp-host line and the /etc/hosts entry generates the equivalent of dhcp-host=name,192.168.X.X When you run Ubuntu, the DHCP requests send the name, so dnsmasq find and uses this line, and all is good. When the machine was reboo

[Bug 327703] Re: DHCP Request Cycle can get caught in infinite loop

2009-03-11 Thread Simon Kelley
Simon Kelley here: I'm the principal author of dnsmasq. I have a couple of questions for FactTech: 1) Was the text message in the DHCPNAK log entry the same as the initial reporter's ("address reserved")? 2) Is there any other dhcp-host line in the dnsmasq configuration w