** Summary changed:
- firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed
+ firebird2.1-classic compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed
--
firebird2.1-classic compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363694
You received
I think stack-protector specific functions become 'required' in dynamic linker
only when certain constructions used in UDF.
If UDF is simple function like 'return sin(x)', this UDF loads perfectly either
with stack protector or without.
--
firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF d
The bug appear in:
r...@ubuntu:~# dpkg -l | fgrep -i firebird2.1-classic
ii firebird2.1-classic 2.1.1.17910-release.ds1-1ubuntu1
Firebird Classic Server - an RDBMS based on
** Changed in: firebird2.1 (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => New
--
firebird 2.1 compiled w
Only one difference between compilations is -fno-stack-protector (with
this option everything OK).
r...@ubuntu:~/rfunc/rfunc/source# gcc --version
gcc (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) 4.3.3
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. Ther
** Attachment added: "This rfunc is .so that dont't work with firebird 2.1"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31746724/rfunc_dont_work
--
firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363694
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Attachment added: "This rfunc is .so that works OK with firebird 2.1"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31746715/rfunc.so_work_ok
--
firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363694
You received this bug notification because you are a m
** Attachment added: "trackerd-cores.tbz2"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31266965/trackerd-cores.tbz2
--
trackerd loop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423561
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing lis
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tracker
mma...@mmarkk-desktop:~/src/tracker$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 9.04
Release:9.04
mma...@mmarkk-desktop:~/src/tracker$ apt-cache policy tracker
tracker:
Установлен: 0.6.93-0ubuntu3
Кандидат
rfunc was compiled on the same PC.
I will post my rfunc.so later (2-3 days) when i get access to that server.
--
firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363694
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
What is meaning of bug state 'fix released' ?
there is no bug, or bug will be closed on next build ?
please describe, or give me the link.
--
firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363694
You received this bug notification because you a
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: firebird2.1-classic
firebird-2.1 classic is compiled with -fno-stack-protector,
so any third-party UDF compiled with default gcc options are not loaded by
firebird at runtime.
and firebird said (Exmple for TANH function in common rfunc
(htt
** Summary changed:
- firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF open failed
+ firebird 2.1 compiled without stack protector, so UDF dlopen failed
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: firebird2.1-classic
firebird-2.1 classic is compiled with -fno-stack-protector,
so a
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firebird2.1-classic
firebird-2.1 classic is compiled with -fno-stack-protector,
so any third-party UDF compiled with default gcc options are not loaded by
firebird at runtime.
and firebird said:
-function TANH is not defined
-module name or entrypoint c
13 matches
Mail list logo
