** Changed in: icedtea-gcjwebplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Won't Fix
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection
dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
sun-java6 still has no plugin description
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection
dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
** Changed in: icedtea-gcjwebplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix => Fix Released
** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing
Alexander,
On upto date Jaunty as of today Icedtea (1st entry) installs correctly - only
other entry now shown is Java SE - haven't tried that one yet.
So yeh, that seems happier.
(IcedTea is a bit flaky - found some 100% java processes left over afterwards -
but that's separate I guess).
Dave
the ubufox task was opened by Matthias to get feedback from me I had
some questions, so its not fixed.
** Changed in: ubufox (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => New
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection
dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
ubufox bug has been fixed.
However I see the following problems:
1. Adobe Flash Player installer does NOT work on 64 bit Ubuntu 9.04 (bug
#361430).
2. (cosmetic) "Adobe Player" and "Gnash Player" using capital "P", while
"Swfdec player" uses small "p".
3. (cosmetic) Adobe Flash Player URL (http:
> reopening the ubufox task, until it's clear how ubufox handles
differently named plugins.
I don't understand what differently named means here? Do you have more
than one plugin .so in a single binary Package? How are those named?
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing p
Dave, please test with an up-to-date jaunty install. I updaed the plugin
DB so all entries displayed in the plugin finder should work. If not,
please open a bug and subscribe me to it.
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection
dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.
> sun-java5 does not provide the plugin package
please don't touch reports if you don't understand how to validate them
** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Triaged
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection
dialog)
https://bugs.launc
sun-java5 does not provide the plugin package
** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection
dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
You received this bug notification because you are a m
If I uninstall all java plugins I get three options:
1) 'The IcedTea Web Browser Plugin'
Selecting this gives the error 'Could not find package
'cacao-oj6-plugin'
2) 'GCJ Web Browser Plugin'
Selecting this gives 'Package 'gcjwebplugin' is virtual.'
3) 'The IcedTea
reopening the ubufox task, until it's clear how ubufox handles
differently named plugins.
** Changed in: ubufox (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection
dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
You received thi
icedtea-gcjwebplugin isn't built anymore
** Changed in: icedtea-gcjwebplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection
dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
You received this bug notification because you
This bug was fixed in the package openjdk-6 - 6b14-1.4.1-0ubuntu5
---
openjdk-6 (6b14-1.4.1-0ubuntu5) jaunty; urgency=low
[Matthias Klose]
* Update to the final CACAO 0.99.4 release.
* Security Vulnerability Fixes for OpenJDK:
- 6522586: Enforce limits on Font creation.
> To provide proper integration with ubufox,
>
> 1. plugins that use update-alternatives mechanism should also put a link for
> their binary in
>
> /usr/share/ubufox/plugins/
> Xbb-Npp-File: libgnashplugin.so
this doesn't work for the current java plugins, which are installed
under a different
This bug was fixed in the package totem - 2.25.90-0ubuntu3
---
totem (2.25.90-0ubuntu3) jaunty; urgency=low
* debian/control{.in}: add XB-Npp-Description and XB-Npp-Filename
header to the totem-mozilla package to improve ubufox/ubuntu plugin db
integration (LP: #272010)
--
** Description changed:
- To provide proper integration with ubufox, plugins should also put a
- link for their binary in
+ To provide proper integration with ubufox,
+
+ 1. plugins that use update-alternatives mechanism should also put a link
+ for their binary in
/usr/share/ubufox/plugin
17 matches
Mail list logo
