Andrea Francia wrote:
> And it followed in
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-October/msg00216.html
>
You can read a summary of the discussion on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue147 or if it is down at
http://www.google.it/search?q=Fedora+Weekly+News+147
I rea
Christoph Bloch wrote:
> One more suggestion: Don't name the trash command "trash-file" unless there
> are absolutely compulsory reasons for it. My arguments against "trash-file":
> * It is not intuitive and therefore unnecessarily difficult to memorise.
> * It is unnecessarily long.
> * Every
One more suggestion: Don't name the trash command "trash-file" unless there are
absolutely compulsory reasons for it. My arguments against "trash-file":
* It is not intuitive and therefore unnecessarily difficult to memorise.
* It is unnecessarily long.
* Every change in the name of programs ca
I did what you suggested:
>sudo apt-get remove trash-cli
>sudo apt-get install python-setuptools
>sudo easy_install trash-cli
>
Then I did the same procedure as before (trash-file everything from a
directory, trash-file the directory itself, try to restore-trash
(trash-restore?) on
Hi,
I'm the writer of trash-cli.
Would you test if the reported behaviour will occour with the latest
development version of trash-cli?
To install the last version:
sudo apt-get remove trash-cli
sudo easy_install trash-cli
If you don't have easy_install you could install it with "apt-ge
