The documentaion has been updated since the original bug was filed. If
you feel that it could and should be improved further please file a new
bug with suggestions were it could be improved.
I'm going to close (reject) this bug.
** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Reject
Speaking as the upstream Debian package maintainer...
The main problem with building module packages for every kernel is that the set
of kernels is constantly changing and the build machinery required both
involves a ton of packages and very, very frequent changes to track the kernel
revisions.
It seems the documentation is a different one from the original bug, isn't it?
Shouldn't we close this one and open on just regarding documentation?
Brenden, does lates dapper package work for you?
--
OpenAFS does not work
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/3547
--
universe-bugs mailing list
uni
Do you have any suggestion on howto improve the documentation?
As you have going through the pain of installing the client and made it work
we would like to know in what area the documentation is lacking.
--
OpenAFS does not work
https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/3547
--
universe-bugs mailing
