Re: constraint about no of supersteps

2014-01-29 Thread Peter Grman
Yes but you can disable the counters per superstep, if you don't need the data, and than I had around 2000 after which my algorithm stopped. Cheers Peter On Jan 29, 2014 4:22 PM, "Claudio Martella" wrote: > the limit is currently defined by the maximum number of counters your > jobtracker allows

Re: Running an algo for selected no of vertices..

2014-01-04 Thread Peter Grman
blem.. > Suppose I want to implement SingleSourceShortestPath algo for some > vertices. > Then how i will proceed??How I will change Source_id once algo is > completed for one vertex? > > Thanks > Jyoti > > > On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Peter Grman wrote: > >&

Re: Running an algo for selected no of vertices..

2014-01-04 Thread Peter Grman
Yes, you know which vertex you are and in which step you are, so if you implement it correctly you can run during the first superstep some computations on vertex(2) and in the second superstep on vertex(5) You could simply ignore your compute function in the first superstep on all vertices except

Re: Extending AbstractComputation

2013-12-23 Thread Peter Grman
I don't know the exact logic, maybe somebody who does could elaborate on that, but I noticed that it was used multiple times for different Nodes, I would think that it is used as a pool to minimize the number of object created, am I right here? The question I would add, can it be that the compute