Re: Is it normal that a same algorithm for 4 profiles calculus implemented both in giraph and graphlab gives different output with same input?

Awesome, thanks for the update. We'll be happy to review your code. On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 7:30 AM Francesco Sclano wrote: > Hi Dionysios, > the problem was simply due to some trivial bugs of my giraph > implementation. Now I'm able to produce the same output both from graphlab > and my giraph

Re: Is it normal that a same algorithm for 4 profiles calculus implemented both in giraph and graphlab gives different output with same input?

Hi Dionysios, the problem was simply due to some trivial bugs of my giraph implementation. Now I'm able to produce the same output both from graphlab and my giraph implementation of 4-profiles calculus. For instance I used http://snap.stanford.edu/data/p2p-Gnutella08.html as input graph. Regarding

Re: Is it normal that a same algorithm for 4 profiles calculus implemented both in giraph and graphlab gives different output with same input?

Hi Francesco, Here are few thoughts on reasons this may happen: - I haven't written any graphlab application myself, but the synchronous vs. asynchronous model can generally be a reason for differences. It is possible that such differences do not manifest on smaller graphs. What's the size of the

Is it normal that a same algorithm for 4 profiles calculus implemented both in giraph and graphlab gives different output with same input?

Hi, I implemented in giraph the calculus of 4 profiles ( https://people.csail.mit.edu/jshun/papers/ESBD16.pdf) already implemented here https://github.com/eelenberg/4-profiles with graphlab. I'm able to run both graphlab e giraph programs. I know well differences between graphlab and giraph but I h