No, I tagged it.
On 1/30/14, 5:07 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Avery Ching wrote:
I've upgraded HBase in Giraph-833 ( HBase 0.90.5-> 0.94.16)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-833
Any reason it is not marked as for 1.1.0?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Avery Ching wrote:
> I've upgraded HBase in Giraph-833 ( HBase 0.90.5-> 0.94.16)
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-833
Any reason it is not marked as for 1.1.0?
Thanks,
Roman.
I've upgraded HBase in Giraph-833 ( HBase 0.90.5-> 0.94.16)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-833
Avery
On 1/30/14, 4:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Rob Paul wrote:
Is it possible that we move to newer version of Hive and HBase?
Anything's possibl
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Rob Paul wrote:
> Is it possible that we move to newer version of Hive and HBase?
Anything's possible if somebody is willing to do the work ;-) Feel free
to file a JIRA, post a patch and make sure that the build and tests
don't regress.
Thanks,
Roman.
Is it possible that we move to newer version of Hive and HBase?
Thanks
Rob
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am fully back and ready to pick up the duties of the RM for 1.1.0.
>
> My goal for next week is to clean up our JIRA queue, clean up
> Jenkins runs and
Hi!
I am fully back and ready to pick up the duties of the RM for 1.1.0.
My goal for next week is to clean up our JIRA queue, clean up
Jenkins runs and hopefully cut a release branch. As a first order
of business I would really appreciate if somebody with the commit
bit can help reviewing the fol
Hi!
I am fully back and ready to pick up the duties of the RM for 1.1.0.
My goal for next week is to clean up our JIRA queue, clean up
Jenkins runs and hopefully cut a release branch. As a first order
of business I would really appreciate if somebody with the commit
bit can help reviewing the fol
From: Claudio Martella [mailto:claudio.marte...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 8:47 AM
> To: user@giraph.apache.org
> Cc: Sebastian Schelter
>
>
> Subject: Re: Release date for 1.1.0
>
>
>
> I think that after 1.1.0 we could consider this big change, and
I agree with Sebastian, Mirko and Claudio. GIRAPH-818 is a big change and
better be pursued after 1.1.0 release.
From: Claudio Martella [mailto:claudio.marte...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 8:47 AM
To: user@giraph.apache.org
Cc: Sebastian Schelter
Subject: Re: Release date for
I think that after 1.1.0 we could consider this big change, and that there
should be voting for this. It's changing Giraph's shape at the core.
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Mirko Kämpf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> also think this major change (or enhancement) might be something which
> goes into Giraph
>
>>>> By and large though, ASF project typically don't give any
>>>> schedule for future releases. The way to speed it up is
>>>> to join the community, start contributing and volunteering
>>>> as RM.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
Hi,
also think this major change (or enhancement) might be something which goes
into Giraph in a later release.
Will there be a voting for such issues?
Mirko
Zhu, Xia [mailto:xia@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 4:36 PM
To: user@giraph.apache.org
Subject: RE: Release date for 1.1.0
May I know what are the Giraph release process?
Thanks,
Ivy
-Original Message-
From: shaposh...@gmail.com [mailto:shaposh...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Roman
Sha
Roman.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Zhu, Xia wrote:
>>> Is it possible to release 1.1.0 before March 2014?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Xia
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Zhu, Xia [mailto:xia@intel.com]
>
2014 at 5:02 PM, Zhu, Xia wrote:
>> Is it possible to release 1.1.0 before March 2014?
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Xia
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Zhu, Xia [mailto:xia@intel.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 4:36 PM
>> To
giraph.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Release date for 1.1.0
>
> May I know what are the Giraph release process?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ivy
> -Original Message-
> From: shaposh...@gmail.com [mailto:shaposh...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Roman
> Shaposhnik
> Sent: M
gt; Is it possible to release 1.1.0 before March 2014?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Xia
> -Original Message-
> From: Zhu, Xia [mailto:xia@intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 4:36 PM
> To: user@giraph.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Release date for 1.1.0
>
Is it possible to release 1.1.0 before March 2014?
Thanks,
Xia
-Original Message-
From: Zhu, Xia [mailto:xia@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 4:36 PM
To: user@giraph.apache.org
Subject: RE: Release date for 1.1.0
May I know what are the Giraph release process?
Thanks
May I know what are the Giraph release process?
Thanks,
Ivy
-Original Message-
From: shaposh...@gmail.com [mailto:shaposh...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Roman
Shaposhnik
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 9:22 PM
To: user@giraph.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release date for 1.1.0
On Mon, Jan 6
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Ahmet Emre Aladağ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any advances so far on the 1.1.0 release schedule?
Unfortunately, with my recent job change driving 1.1.0 release
dropped from my list. I'll try to pick it up back this month. Still
very much would like to help make it h
Hi,
Are there any advances so far on the 1.1.0 release schedule?
Best,
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Artie Pesh-Imam
> wrote:
> > Will this be published to a mvn repo? That'd be a pretty nice win. I know
> > there's a task for it
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Artie Pesh-Imam
wrote:
> Will this be published to a mvn repo? That'd be a pretty nice win. I know
> there's a task for it but its still not done yet. correct?
AFAIR, it wasn't done on purpose for 1.0.0 release because of
how build munges and also because the unde
Will this be published to a mvn repo? That'd be a pretty nice win. I know
there's a task for it but its still not done yet. correct?
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Avery Ching wrote:
> +1, how do we get this started?
>
>
> On 10/29/13 2:18 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> +dev@
>>
>> On Tue,
+1, how do we get this started?
On 10/29/13 2:18 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
+dev@
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Avery Ching wrote:
I would like that as well. Does someone else want to coordinate this one?
=)
If all of the PMC members are fine with a non-committer
driving a release -- I
+dev@
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Avery Ching wrote:
> I would like that as well. Does someone else want to coordinate this one?
> =)
If all of the PMC members are fine with a non-committer
driving a release -- I'd be more than happy to volunteer
as an RM for 1.1.0. That said, I would sti
I would like that as well. Does someone else want to coordinate this
one? =)
Avery
On 10/29/13 6:15 AM, Claudio Martella wrote:
I actually agree, we should start heading towards 1.1.0 with a plan.
Avery, what do you think?
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Ahmet Emre Aladağ
mailto:aladage.
I actually agree, we should start heading towards 1.1.0 with a plan.
Avery, what do you think?
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Ahmet Emre Aladağ wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there an expected date for 1.1.0? There has been a lot of way taken
> since 1.0.0.
>
> --
> Ahmet Emre Aladağ
>
--
Clau
27 matches
Mail list logo
