[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 April 2007 22:12
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: The Return of...Inaccurate Calculation of Order
Peter,
Sorry it took me so long to take a peek at this...
My guess is that the calculation process is not what you are
expected, namely in terms of when the roun
= 10
>
>
> Can anyone offer some assistance.
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Peter
>
>
> From: Scott Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 April 2007 01:27
> To: user@ofbiz.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: The Return of...Inaccurate Calcul
__
From: Scott Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 April 2007 01:27
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The Return of...Inaccurate Calculation of Order
Peter
Change this line:
salestax.calc.decimals = 10
and see if that gives you the results you are expecting.
CTED]
Subject: Re: The Return of...Inaccurate Calculation of Order
Peter
Change this line:
salestax.calc.decimals = 10
and see if that gives you the results you are expecting.
Regards
Scott
On 18/04/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
There is something very odd abo
uch a basic requirement.
I must be overlooking something. Anyone, can you help.
Thanks & Regards,
Peter.
- original message -
Subject:Re: The Return of...Inaccurate Calculation of Order
From: "BJ Freeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 18/04/2007 02:19
i
urely, Ofbiz must be able to calculate the tax (at 17.5%) correctly, it is
such a basic requirement.
I must be overlooking something. Anyone, can you help.
Thanks & Regards,
Peter.
- original message -
Subject:Re: The Return of...Inaccurate Calculation of Order
From: "BJ Fr
ND_CEILING
> will round to 1.2, but for -1.13,
>
> # ROUND_UP gives you -1.2 and ROUND_CEILING -1.1.)
>
> salestax.calc.decimals = 3
>
> salestax.final.decimals = 2
>
> salestax.rounding = ROUND_HALF_UP
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
>
ls = 2
salestax.rounding = ROUND_HALF_UP
Thanks & Regards,
Peter
_
From: Tim Ruppert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 April 2007 19:06
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Cc: 'Chris Howe'
Subject: Re: The Return of...Inaccurate Calculation of Order
He means - kill th
ent: 16 April 2007 19:06
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Cc: 'Chris Howe'
Subject: Re: The Return of...Inaccurate Calculation of Order
He means - kill the process - and then restart it. Shut it down and start it
up.
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
anks & Regards,
Peter
____________
From: Scott Gray [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 April 2007 01:16
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Inaccurate Calculation of Order
Here is the configuration file, you can change the settings to
wha
D]
Subject: Re: The Return of...Inaccurate Calculation of Order
Hi Peter,
You need to restart OFBiz, not just clear the cache. Hope that helps.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Sure hope you can help with this, I have been going around in
> circles.
>
> I am
orrect' for everyone. What
> would
> be your guidance as to what the file should be?
>
> Appreciate your fast responses this evening. It is 1:15am here in the
> UK
> just can't stay awake any more.
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Peter
>
>
>
he UK
just can't stay awake any more.
Thanks & Regards,
Peter
From: Scott Gray [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 April 2007 01:16
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Inaccurate Calculation of Order
Here is th
iginal Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Shere
Sent: 05 April 2007 14:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Inaccurate Calculation of Order
This assessment appears to confirm that OFBiz does the rounding this
way: Rounding line items to three digits, then roundin
x.final.decimals = 2
salestax.rounding = ROUND_HALF_UP
Thanks & Regards,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Shere
Sent: 05 April 2007 14:45
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Inaccurate Calculation of Order
This assessment appears to con
l 2007 22:39
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Inaccurate Calculation of Order
Importance: High
What do you mean by "traditional means" here?
-David
On Apr 4, 2007, at 5:15 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone run into the problem
7, at 5:50 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for responding.
An excel spreadsheet that our account had verified.
Thanks & Regards,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: David E. Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 April 2007 22:39
To: user@ofbiz.apach
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From Excel...
Would appreciated any feedback.
Just because you set Excel to display a certain number of digits, that means
nothing. You can get it to behave closer with the setting "Precision As
Displayed", but using Excel as a "reference" when dealing with floating
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 April 2007 00:11
To: 'user@ofbiz.apache.org'
Subject: RE: Inaccurate Calculation of Order
Importance: High
Hi,
Whichever way I work it out the Order Entry system does seem to be
slightly
out.
From Excel...
To: 'user@ofbiz.apache.org'
Subject: RE: Inaccurate Calculation of Order
Importance: High
Hi,
Whichever way I work it out the Order Entry system does seem to be slightly
out.
>From Excel...
Price tax 2 digits tax 3 digitstax 9 digits
Product 1
Regards,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Crum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 April 2007 23:34
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Inaccurate Calculation of Order
David,
I just calculated the tax on each line item accurate to 9 decimals, summed
the
taxes, and I still get a to
avid,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for responding.
> > >>
> > >> An excel spreadsheet that our account had verified.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks & Regards,
> > >>
> > >> Pe
r responding.
>>
>> An excel spreadsheet that our account had verified.
>>
>>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David E. Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 04 April 20
Thanks & Regards,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: David E. Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 April 2007 22:39
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Inaccurate Calculation of Order
Importance: High
What do you mean by "traditional means" here?
-David
On Apr
: David E. Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 April 2007 23:12
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Inaccurate Calculation of Order
U need more details. There are variations in rounding modes,
precision rules etc.
For example with VAT in pretty much ALL countries that use VAT you
ubject: Re: Inaccurate Calculation of Order
Importance: High
What do you mean by "traditional means" here?
-David
On Apr 4, 2007, at 5:15 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone run into the problem of having Purchases not calculated
accurately?
rate Calculation of Order
Also what are the applicable tax rates being applied?
Regards
Scott
On 05/04/07, David E. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> What do you mean by "traditional means" here?
>
> -David
>
>
> On Apr 4, 2007, at 5:15 PM, <[EMAIL
Hi David,
Thanks for responding.
An excel spreadsheet that our account had verified.
Thanks & Regards,
Peter
-Original Message-
From: David E. Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 April 2007 22:39
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Inaccurate Calculation of O
Also what are the applicable tax rates being applied?
Regards
Scott
On 05/04/07, David E. Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What do you mean by "traditional means" here?
-David
On Apr 4, 2007, at 5:15 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Has anyone run into the pr
What do you mean by "traditional means" here?
-David
On Apr 4, 2007, at 5:15 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone run into the problem of having Purchases not calculated
accurately?
These are the figures calculated by traditional means;
Product 1: 35.74
Produ
Hi,
Has anyone run into the problem of having Purchases not calculated
accurately?
These are the figures calculated by traditional means;
Product 1: 35.74
Product 2: 35.74
Shipping : 6.00
Total: 77.48
Tax : 13.56
-
Total: 91.04
These are the figures calculated by
31 matches
Mail list logo
