I believe this has to do with the timing of the consumer connection and
the network creation. You'll need to ensure that the consumer connects
after the NoB links are made.
hh_meta wrote:
broker A, broker B forms a network of brokers. remote consumer connects to
the network using multicast di
broker A, broker B forms a network of brokers. remote consumer connects to
the network using multicast discovery, it could connect to any of the
brokers in the network, let's say broker B. each broker has a producer.
when message sends out via broker B, it sends to consumer right away. when
messag
I'm trying to build ActiveMQ and deploy it to an "internal" repository.
But, it fails:
siryn-apus:~/Desktop/apache-activemq-5.0-SNAPSHOT/src kplummer$ mvn
deploy:deploy
-DaltDeploymentRepository="eMAF.repo::default::file:///Users/kplummer/Development/workspace/maven-repository"
-e
+ Error s
The desires are:
1) Use zeroconf for brokers to discovery each other in the network
2) Use zeroconf for message clients to auto-discover brokers it can
connect to
3) Each broker in the network should (optionally) be highly reliable to
avoid message loss by replicating
its message stor
Thanks, that worked. But only if setting sessionTransacted to true and
not using an external transaction manager, which rules out XA transactions.
I'm still unconvinced that implementing the redelivery policy in the
MessageConsumer is appropriate or even correct. If you have two
consumers on t
ksu wrote:
Is it possible to have a Network of Brokers where each of the brokers is a
cluster of (File sharing) Master / Slave cluster?
The idea here to to build a system that has good performance characteristics
and can be scaled easily by simply adding more brokers.
I see a couple of po
Is it possible to have a Network of Brokers where each of the brokers is a
cluster of (File sharing) Master / Slave cluster?
The idea here to to build a system that has good performance characteristics
and can be scaled easily by simply adding more brokers.
I see a couple of potential issues
Hi Raj,
Could you suggest which version of 5.0 i can use to see if this works fine
for me.
Regards
-Sambit
rajdavies wrote:
>
> this is a known issue - but has only been fixed in 5.0
>
> On Jul 11, 2007, at 7:59 AM, sambit wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Naga,
>> Did you get any solution to this ?
>>
Use CACHE_CONSUMER in Spring Message listener container, this will not create
session and consumer everytime its polls.
Adam Lewandowski wrote:
>
> At what level does the redelivery policy get applied? I've got a
> transactional consumer (Spring MDP) that is performing a rollback and I
> a
Did you get an answer to your problem? My problem that is after throwing
RuntimeException my message is not redelivered, further more any otherv message
from the queue is not delivered any more, till I restart the app.
I've fixed/kludged the latest instance of this problem by manually draining
the queue before sending in my test messages; e.g.
while (true) {
TextMessage m1 = (TextMessage) consumer.receive(3000);
if (m1 == null) break;
}
The problem seems to be that under som
On 7/6/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't see anything wrong I'm afraid. Maybe there's some timing issue
where the close of the connection is a tad asynchronous in some aspect
of closing the broker down properly.
FWIW lots of the test cases in ActiveMQ derive from
EmbeddedBro
I saw that the exact question i have was asked here:
http://www.nabble.com/jms-routing-tf1333152s2354.html#a3561517
Any change of this?
My network is like this:
A is behind a firewall
B is not behind a firewall
C is behind a firewall
B does not see A and C, until A and C makes a connection to
with failover:// did you set the randomize property to false ? Its
probable your local machine wasn't being picked
On Jul 10, 2007, at 7:03 AM, Jiang wrote:
James:
Whether 'static' schema is not supported also? Last time I tried
'failover', but I find it was slow some way.(I configured 3
oops - I was rushing to jump on a plane - sry folks!
On Jul 11, 2007, at 1:19 AM, Bummer wrote:
No problem. Thanks for all the work you guys have done.
It's working for me too.
Thanks.
James.Strachan wrote:
Sorry about that - it looks like Rob forgot to checkin a file: )
I've patched the
this is a known issue - but has only been fixed in 5.0
On Jul 11, 2007, at 7:59 AM, sambit wrote:
Hi Naga,
Did you get any solution to this ?
Regards
-Sambit
naga007 wrote:
Currently iam running activemq version 4.1.1 in Master Slave mode.
When i
failover from master to slave it seems
16 matches
Mail list logo
