I sent the topic message using persistent:
destination = session->createTopic( "TEST.FOO" );
producer = session->createProducer( destination );
producer->setDeliveryMode( DeliveryMode::PERSISTENT );
..
producer->send( message );
and recived the message with the codes:
destination = ses
Hi,
Env:Tomcat 5.5; ActiveMQ 4.1.1; Log4J 1.2
I am trying to post error messages to a Log4J topic in ActiveMQ via
the JMSAppender. I am running the standard downloaded ActiveMQ 4.1.1
with no modifications.
When I start up a standalone test case in my IDE it works fine. When
I deploy to Tom
this is fixed - http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1056 I
guess it was fixed after the 4.1.1 release was cut :(
On Jul 18, 2007, at 4:39 PM, ttmdev wrote:
I have tried this on 4.1.1 and I'm getting the same results as
Suchitha. I
dumped the timestamp and expiration header fields
I have tried this on 4.1.1 and I'm getting the same results as Suchitha. I
dumped the timestamp and expiration header fields on receipt and they appear
to be set properly. The expiration is equal to timestamp+timetolive_value
The JMS specification states the following:
"Clients should not receiv
The client registers the selector on the broker and the work is done on the
broker side.
On 7/18/07 9:26 AM, "Raffaele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> my question is,
> in a scenario with a client which wants to receive only a subset of all
> messages which run on the net, it spec
Hi all,
my question is,
in a scenario with a client which wants to receive only a subset of all
messages which run on the net, it specifies a MessageConsumer with a
Selector, ok but:
What's happen? Broker sends all the messages and the client perform a
filtering on its side or the broker really
Thanks for the answer but my question is a bit different, that is in my
scenario a normal consumer should be receive only those messages yet live
because their time is not expired and not ALL the unreceived messages like
retroactive consumer do.
So, theere isn't such a capability in ActiveMQ :-(
Hopefully your problem can be helped with some extra configuration -
can you tell us what you are using at the moment ?
On Jul 18, 2007, at 10:14 AM, Simon Vicary wrote:
Hi all,
I have been having some issues which are currently show-stoppers
with the
use of Durable subscriptions with Ac
This is possible - ActiveMQ can cache messages for retroactive
consumers - see http://activemq.apache.org/retroactive-consumer.html
cheers,
Rob Davies
'Go further faster with Apache Camel!'
http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
On Jul 18, 2007, at 9:28 AM, Raffaele wrote:
Hi all,
My scenario is
Hi all,
I have been having some issues which are currently show-stoppers with the
use of Durable subscriptions with Active MQ Topics for our large scale
integration project.
I've been writing the subscriber in C#, but the issue also remains for the
Java implementation. The standard approach for
Hi all,
My scenario is the following:
- One publisher publishes some messages on a topic and assign to them a
timeout.
- The consumer, NO DURABLE, is off when the above messages are sent.
I would like that when the consumer becomes on, even though it wasn't a
durable subscriber, it is able to r
Hi,
I Have a client which is subscribed to Durable Topic with Message Selector,
Everything works fine.
But if i change my system date where my client is running it throws an error
saying
Jul/18 07:00:03 - WARN - [] - Async exception with no exception listener:
org.apache.activemq.transport.Ina
12 matches
Mail list logo