Hi Glen,
I still haven't got this working. I noticed that ActiveMQ was able to create
the activemq_locks and activemq_msgs tables but activemq_acks is missing in
my `show tables;` list. The same behaviour is reproducible by dropping the
database and start ActiveMQ on a clean one.
Any idea?
On 1
- "DanielShao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Error: Exception thrown by the agent : java.net.MalformedURLException:
> Local
> host name unknown: java.net.UnknownHostException: ...
>
> One of our issues is machine's hostName can't be resolved by DNS
> server.
>
> Here is part of my activem
Hi Rob,
Sorry to hear that - I've also spent ages. FWIW, it happens regardless
of the value for persistentIndex, I've used both true and false. Ditto
with syncOnWrite, which I guess is not surprising.
I'll try to modify my unit test further today to more closely mimic my
real application t
Here is the exception that makes the bridge die:
11:04:46,254 DEBUG [org.apache.activemq.network.DemandForwardingBridge] The
local Exception was:java.lang.NullPointerException
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.activemq.network.DemandForwardingBridgeSupport.configureMessage(Dema
Since Version 5 isn't released yet the downloads are found under
"Latest SNAPSHOTS".
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.0-SNAPSHOT/
and then the newest tar.gz or zip.
Mario
On 10/9/07, Epiphany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, when I "
Hi Dave,
spent ages trying to reproduce this with no luck - anybody else had
luck reproducing this on the latest?
cheers,
Rob
http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
On Oct 9, 2007, at 6:28 AM, David Sitsky wrote:
Hi Rob,
Looks like the original issue I reported with duplicate messages
bein
I am wanting to take ActiveMQ for a test drive and determine if it suits some
of my needs. I have noticed that the documentation refers to the fact that
there is some sort of Web Console which would be very useful The docs at
location http://activemq.apache.org/web-console.html state:
" Ru
Just a heads up of a feature thats recently been added; which is an
extension of the Virtual Destinations work called Mirrored Queues.
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1435
They are quite handy; though need to be explicitly enabled as they
have a small cost (a topic is created per queu
hello,
in our instalation we can not get connection from one client to activemq.
telnet activemq port sows the activemq welcome message,
But the connectionfactory gets all the time connection timout even when i
set the timout to 0.
Is there other way to test the connection to activemq broker?
--
We are using the 'duplex' functionality for the same reason. I am getting the
same results whether I use this syntax, as in the distro test case
duplex=true
or this one
...
In both cases the broker initiating the connection comes up fine, but whe
I spoted it in version 4.1.1 I'm not sure if call it a bug but:
When the computer which sends the message has non standart characters like ą
ł ę in the name (windows computer name, I did not test it on Linux)
activemq receives the report stores in oracle database - jdbc persistance
only - with ms
Hi David,
are you trying this with the persistentIndex option?
thanks,
Rob
On Oct 9, 2007, at 6:28 AM, David Sitsky wrote:
Hi Rob,
Looks like the original issue I reported with duplicate messages
being dispatched has resurfaced again. I don't see it happening in
the original situation w
Have you got a test case - there's a basic one in the distro - which
passes.
thanks,
Rob
On Oct 9, 2007, at 11:11 AM, Alex_ynr wrote:
I don't know about ttmdev but I am guessing he is creating it on
one side
(just like I am).
The whole idea (and the reason I'm using the duplex functiona
I don't know about ttmdev but I am guessing he is creating it on one side
(just like I am).
The whole idea (and the reason I'm using the duplex functionality) is that
one of the brokers is behind a firewall and cannot have an incoming
connection...so I wanna set up an outgoing one from that broke
Are you creating two network connections - i.e. one on each broker - or just
one network connection on one broker?
ttmdev wrote:
>
> I am trying to connect two 5.0 brokers via a duplex network connection
> without much success (see exception stack below). I am using the latest
> 5.0 snapshot. I
Hello,
Having the exact same problem here... Is there an answer to this?
Best regards,
Alex
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Unexpected-remote-command-tf4179394s2354.html#a13112492
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
16 matches
Mail list logo