Hi Nathan,
I think we just need ensure that the C/C++/C# clients handle flow
control with the broker
cheers,
Rob
On Dec 12, 2007, at 4:05 AM, Nathan Mittler wrote:
Appreciate your feedback and helping to identify this problem! I've
captured this in a JIRA issue here:
https://issues.apa
On 11/12/2007, madandini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is it possible to use Certificate Revocation Lists to authenticate clients
> connecting to an ActiveMQ broker?
>
> I've seen some Java properties that can enable revocation checking (i.e.
> com.sun.net.ssl.checkRevocation & com.sun.security.en
On 11/12/2007, Hellweek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I pulled the 5.0 down yesterday. As well as the 5.0 RC1, RC2, RC3
Cool thanks. BTW in your previous mail detailing your issues I was a
little confused over what clients were being used - were you seeing
these issues purely with the C++ client
Can anyone confirm or deny the second issue mentioned (what seems like the
slow consumer problem)?
"2. A Producer that producers more then 200 messages per sec locks up the
Broker when the Broker has only one client connected. This one was the
biggest issue to accept and the one issue that caused
Appreciate your feedback and helping to identify this problem! I've
captured this in a JIRA issue here:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-157
We'll do our best to get this resolved soon!
Regards,
Nate
On Dec 11, 2007, at 9:10 AM, Hellweek wrote:
As promised I have created
Hellweek wrote:
Hello,
I know what I am about to post will upset a few people, however I think it
is important that I document my experience with ActiveMQ in the hopes that
others like me can have an understanding of the issues that you will face.
A little history.
I am not new to Open Source
I am personally watching this thread with great interest, as we're
considering using ActiveMQ for a big highly distributed network, but we have
no idea how it would perform in such a setting.
Hellweek wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I know what I am about to post will upset a few people, however I th
Is it possible to use Certificate Revocation Lists to authenticate clients
connecting to an ActiveMQ broker?
I've seen some Java properties that can enable revocation checking (i.e.
com.sun.net.ssl.checkRevocation & com.sun.security.enableCRLDP), but when I
try to run the ActiveMQ broker with t
As promised I have created a c++ test program (TestProducerBug) that will
create up to X producers. The class that does the work is
(TestProducers.cpp).
I am created a C# test program (TestConsumerBugCSharp) that will create up
to X consumers using a MessageListener. The class that does the work
I pulled the 5.0 down yesterday. As well as the 5.0 RC1, RC2, RC3
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 11/12/2007, Hellweek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Most of this testing was done with the 5.0 trunk.
>
> How long ago BTW? Only we've had a 5.0 trunk for about a year :)
>
>> thinking that it wa
On 11/12/2007, Hellweek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Most of this testing was done with the 5.0 trunk.
How long ago BTW? Only we've had a 5.0 trunk for about a year :)
> thinking that it was a
> problem with the 5.0 I tried on the 4.1 with even worse issues.
>
> Last night and today I finaly am
Most of this testing was done with the 5.0 trunk. thinking that it was a
problem with the 5.0 I tried on the 4.1 with even worse issues.
Last night and today I finaly am able to reproduce the issues I am seeing
and will be posting my test code.
While I can not currently use ActiveMQ in producti
It's solved!!
I tried with ActiveMQ5 RC4 (just released). It works perfectly
Can't wait for the final release...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-have-autoreconnect-in-this-situation-tp14248871s2354p14275885.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archi
Chris Neal wrote:
>
> Is there documentation on on what fields the REST interface will take..
> (i.e. are there any ActiveMQ special fields in the post...)
>
Here is a list of the fields that you can add to the post:
type
body
JMSReplyTo
JMSType
JMSCorrelationID
JMSExpiration
JMSPriority
J
On 11/12/2007, krv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We have a requirement in our project to dispatch scheduled messages. Here is
> what the exact requirement is:
> * The sender sends a message with an 'inceptionTime' property
> * The receiver should be notified of this message only at the t
On 10/12/2007, Hellweek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I know what I am about to post will upset a few people, however I think it
> is important that I document my experience with ActiveMQ in the hopes that
> others like me can have an understanding of the issues that you will face.
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
