I have a scenario, with amq 5.1
Where more messages are being received than are sent. Should that be
possible? It looks like indeed some of the messages are getting delivered
twice, and tallied as such in the webconsole view of the queueIs there
some setting I need to place on my queues
Hi All
I am using the 5.0 ver and JDK 1.5
I am trying to establish a master - slave arch. network of brokers so that
if the master goes down the slave should take up.
I configured the activemq.xml file accordingly with tutorial and the
suggestions given in the forms.
The network is being estab
I tried working with the cleanupInterval (the default is 30 secs, not 30 mins
as I had indicated below)...
Not sure how to testI sent a bunch of messages through, and then waited
5 minutes before shutting down the broker and restartingI still see 2
messages sitting in the pending state in
Hi all,
I'm building an MFC application that uses the ActiveMQ CMS to communicate
with an ActiveMQ server. When I first introduced MFC into my project, I
started getting "Detected memory leaks!" showing up in my output when
debugging. To verify this was due to ActiveMQ, I created a separate MFC
I'm having an issue with amq 5.1-SNAPSHOT, when stopping and restarting the
broker.
I'll process a batch of messages through my application. I'll look on the
webconsole, and see that all queues have no messages pending. I then
shutdown the broker.
Often, when I bring the broker back up, the we
I am using the 5.1 SNAPSHOT and this failover uri works for me.
failover://(tcp://localhost:61616?wireFormat.cacheEnabled=false&wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration=0&wireFormat.tightEncodingEnabled=true)?maxReconnectDelay=1000
Jason Rosenberg wrote:
>
> I think the uri parsing doesn't like nested
Well, in theory it should work because it appears to conform to the proper
syntax. That is, failover://(uri1,...,uriN)?TransportOptions
I gave it a quick try, and here are my results. Note that in your case, you
should have randomize set to false because you first want to connect via the
discover
Is it possible to use MultiCast for failover, but in the event that all those
brokers become unavailable, you would use a static ip address?
failover://(discovery:multicast://default,tcp://test.you.com:61616)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Failover--use-multicast%2C-then
I'm using ActiveMQ cms 2.1.3 and using 4.1.1 java broker running 64 bit
OpenSuse Linux.
Cheers,
Dan.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Active-MQ-Client-crash-tp15356897s2354p15356898.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I'm fairly new to the ActiveMQ API. I have 2 C++ applications, one is a
simple client and a server. The server and the client talks through ActiveMQ
cms, currently running on the same machine. I'm having problems tracking
down crashes in the ActiveMQ code.
I'm currently testing how the clien
Hi,
We have an ActiveMQ instance (version 4.1.1) in production, exhibiting the
following behaviour: There is a backlog of 1000 messages in the queue that
are not being delivered. However, new messages *are* being delivered. For
example: If 3 new messages are posted to the queue, we see that the q
On 08/02/2008, phb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We're looking for a new interprocess communication mecanism for the
> applications we develop on Linux (today we use a mix of techniques from UNIX
> IPC to sockets and pipes)
>
> A good candidate for us is dbus, which is available from the Q
Hi,
We're looking for a new interprocess communication mecanism for the
applications we develop on Linux (today we use a mix of techniques from UNIX
IPC to sockets and pipes)
A good candidate for us is dbus, which is available from the Qt API we're
working with. We're also considering ActiveMQ f
Hello users,
Dont we have any tutorial for Apache Active MQ? I have downloaded the Active
MQ version 5 but i am yet to find any good tutorial for getting started
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tutorial-for-Apache-Active-MQ-tp15354836s2354p15354836.html
Sent from the Acti
Hi Guys,
I have coded an embedded broker following the example given with ActiveMQ.
However, I noticed that the maximum memory usage is always 30198988 bytes,
even if I called setSystemUsage() (I also called setProducerSystemUsage()
and setConsumerSystemUsage()).
The effect of this is that when
Is there noone with an idea?
I've made a new graph with a longer timeperiod:
http://achelois.tweakers.net/~acm/tnet/long-activemq-gc.png
For now we can only fix this by periodically restart ActiveMQ, but
that's not a very nice aproach.
Best regards,
Arjen
Arjen van der Meijden wrote:
Hi li
On Feb 7, 2008 1:51 PM, QWERTY? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Im struggling to understand one thing about this, do i need the Websphere
> JMS classes to actually setup the bridge.
>
> and if yes where do i get them, ive trawled the IBM websphere pages for
> hours to no avail or do i have
17 matches
Mail list logo