Re: Maximum number of durable topics per MQ instance.

Thanks, Bruce. Joe bsnyder wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:55 AM, ttmdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> Re the reference to "AIO", does this mean support for AIO4J or that >> AMQ's use >> of NIO is considered asynchronous i/o? > > It's a reference to AIO4J: > > http://www.alphawo

Re: Regarding Store and Forward: Network of Brokers

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 6:02 PM, GeekPro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanku so much... > Finally I configured with 2 brokers pointing each other > A->b and b->A > It worked fine. > > When I configured with 4 brokers with mesh top'lgy > a->b , c , d. > b-> a , c , d > c-> a, b , d > d-> a

Re: Regarding Store and Forward: Network of Brokers

bsnyder wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 5:42 PM, GeekPro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> FYI-- I am using hermes tool along with ActiveMQ for producing and >> consuming >> messages. >> YES I am using Topics but I didn't get the messages on both the >> listeners (I >> got it only on one)

Re: Maximum number of durable topics per MQ instance.

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 8:55 AM, ttmdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Re the reference to "AIO", does this mean support for AIO4J or that AMQ's use > of NIO is considered asynchronous i/o? It's a reference to AIO4J: http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/aio4j See the following for more informati

Re: Pure Master Slave not working

Hi Joe, I'm currently also trying to get a stable Pure master/slave up and running and run in similar problems. I have tried 4.0.2, 4.1.1, 5.0.0 and a 5.1 snapshot. Neither worked sufficiently. Pretty frustrating. After having read your post I tried 4.1.1 again and - indeed the failover worked al

Re: Pure Master Slave not working

Thanks. I think I'm a bit of an idiot for one thing I did, but I still have a problem. A quick summary is that I changed the failover URL, but it didn't help. (Per a page on the site I tried it with two slashes ("failover://(...") and no slashes ("failover:(..."), but neither worked.) Then as I w

Re: Pure Master Slave not working

You want your client to first attempt to connect to the master (macserver). So turn off randomization like this and see if your results are any different. failover:(tcp://macserver:61616,tcp://localhost:61616)?randomize=false&initialReconnectDelay=100 The documentation on the web site states t

Re: ActiveMQ 5.0.0 depends on SNAPSHOT?

Perhaps the maven 2 section of the http://http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-500-release.html 5.0.0 home page should be changed to reflect this: {code:xml} org.apache.activemq activemq-core 5.0.0 org.apache.activemq activeio-core

Re: Regarding Store and Forward: Network of Brokers

On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 5:42 PM, GeekPro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FYI-- I am using hermes tool along with ActiveMQ for producing and consuming > messages. > YES I am using Topics but I didn't get the messages on both the listeners (I > got it only on one) This is possible because the func

Pure Master Slave not working

I'm trying to create a Pure Master Slave configuration using AMQ 4.1.1 and a slightly stripped down version of the default configuration files. (I originally tried with AMQ 5.0.0 but had too many problems, so I dropped back a release.) After the Master and Slave seem to start up okay, the system d

Re: Maximum number of durable topics per MQ instance.

Re the reference to "AIO", does this mean support for AIO4J or that AMQ's use of NIO is considered asynchronous i/o? Joe rajdavies wrote: > > > On Feb 14, 2008, at 12:05 AM, davewolfs wrote: > >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> I am hoping that some of you could provide me with some realistic >>

Re: Maximum number of durable topics per MQ instance.

You bring up some good points with respect to file descriptors. Any ideas what the maximums are on an OS like linux? I was actually considering modifying the REST Servlet so that it can support durable subscribers and if this was the case then there is potential for a single JVM process to have

Re: dead letter queue

You can set maxiumRedeliveries for your redelivery policy to -1 to achieve that Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac www.scriptinginjava.net On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 3:19 PM, padelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > How do I disable dead letter queue processing completely for ActiveMQ 5.0.0 > broker ? >

dead letter queue

Hi How do I disable dead letter queue processing completely for ActiveMQ 5.0.0 broker ? I want to be able to consume messages and do session.rollback() any number of times without having to examine ActiveMQ.DLQ content. many thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/dead-lett

redeliveryCounter not updated correctly using ActiveMQ 5.0.0

Hi all, I am having a problem with redelivery of messages after transaction rollback. I am using XA in combination with Springs DefaultMessageListenerContainer and have a simple test case in which the MessageListener throws an IllegalStateException which triggers a transaction rollback. After tha

Re: Locked trying to write to journal

Manuel Teira-2 wrote: > > Hello. I've just detected a lock problem using activemq-core 4.0.2 that > seems to be related with journal writing logic. > I was able to get a stack of the running process, where we can see that > a lot of threads (56 to be precise) are waiting to lock the journal >

SQLException : table or view does not exist

Dear All: First, I try to start my embedded broker with config xml in MQ4.1. It starts successfully, if I set db-source as SQL server 2005. But I got exception below for oracle. 14-02-2008 16:48:58 ERROR [broker.BrokerService] - Failed to start ActiveMQ JMS Message Broker. Reason: java.io.IOExcep