Note that failover reconnected fine BTW
On 04/03/2008, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks like the socket failed - could be thebroker thinking the
> socket was inactive. You could try increasing or disabling the
> inactivity timeout.
>
>
> On 03/03/2008, Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECT
It looks like the socket failed - could be thebroker thinking the
socket was inactive. You could try increasing or disabling the
inactivity timeout.
On 03/03/2008, Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone know why this would happen? Other clients connected simultaneously
> don't disconnect. E
I have been consistently receiving the following error message when using
Jenck with ActiveMQ for pooled inbound JMS: "ERROR RecoveryListenerAdapter
- Message id x could not be recovered from the data store - already
dispatched" on the broker. Once the error message occurs, none of the
messag
That is rather strange, because the activemq script starts only one instance
of the broker.
QWERTY? wrote:
>
>
>
> ttmdev wrote:
>>
>> Yup, looks like it. What version of AMQ are you using and are you using
>> the $ACTIVEMQ_HOME/bin/activemq script to start the broker?
>>
>> Joe
>>
>>
>
ttmdev wrote:
>
> Yup, looks like it. What version of AMQ are you using and are you using
> the $ACTIVEMQ_HOME/bin/activemq script to start the broker?
>
> Joe
>
>
Yes - I just cd into /bin and ./activemq - and off it goes
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-
Yup, looks like it. What version of AMQ are you using and are you using the
$ACTIVEMQ_HOME/bin/activemq script to start the broker?
Joe
QWERTY? wrote:
>
>
>
> ttmdev wrote:
>>
>> The "36 ActiveMQ processes" that you mention...are these 36 message
>> brokers?
>>
>> Joe
>> www.ttmsolutions
ttmdev wrote:
>
> The "36 ActiveMQ processes" that you mention...are these 36 message
> brokers?
>
> Joe
> www.ttmsolutions.com
>
>
ahh they are 36~ of there
/usr/java/bin/java -Dorg.apache.
activemq.UseDedicatedTaskRunner=true -Dderby.system.home=/home/java/
/server/activemq/data -Dderby
The "36 ActiveMQ processes" that you mention...are these 36 message brokers?
Joe
www.ttmsolutions.com
QWERTY? wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> when running activemq and I connect to it with a client I get the
> following exception or exceptions?
>
> java.io.EOFException
> at java.io.DataInputStre
We are currently experiencing a problem where are consumers are not always
being released when we shutdown our consumers. This seems to happen less
than half the time, but does force us to restart at least one of the 2
ActiveMQ servers that we have in our Shared File System Master Slave
cluster.
Hi,
We are using Activemq version 4.1.1, tcp transport and the producers are
configured to connect to a single load balancer that distributes requests to
individual brokers. However, more often than not, we notice symptons where
jms messge queuing requests are not probably load balanced, mainly
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Eddie Yee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wondering if someone could point me to some decent books featuring
> Active MQ (preferably the latest 5.x). More from an infrastructural, setup,
> enterprise design and best practices point of view.
>
> I realize ther
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 2:27 PM, ttmdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not an expert in this area, but I don't think anything gets serialized
> to XML when JMS client and broker are communicating over an http transport.
> I would venture to guess that in this scenario the OpenWire protocol i
I was wondering if someone could point me to some decent books featuring Active
MQ (preferably the latest 5.x). More from an infrastructural, setup,
enterprise design and best practices point of view.
I realize there are a lot of resources online, however I prefer to have this
information
Hhmm, I guess you could use the Apache mod_proxy module to forward
requests/responses to/from the broker.
I'm not an expert in this area, but I don't think anything gets serialized
to XML when JMS client and broker are communicating over an http transport.
I would venture to guess that in this
Anyone know why this would happen? Other clients connected simultaneously
don't disconnect. Everything is on a simple LAN so no networking issues
should exist for one client and not others..
Thanks,
Andrew
Mar 3, 2008 3:00:55 PM
org.apache.activemq.transport.failover.FailoverTransport
handleTr
Hi,
when running activemq and I connect to it with a client I get the following
exception or exceptions?
java.io.EOFException
at java.io.DataInputStream.readInt(DataInputStream.java:375)
at
org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.unmarshal(OpenWireFormat.
java:268)
at
Another thing I'm trying to do is integrate ActiveMQ with JBoss. I've
gotten this [1] to work great with the TCP transport, but I'm not
having much luck getting it to use the HTTP transport. I keep
getting:
13:27:40,050 ERROR [BrokerService] Failed to start ActiveMQ JMS
Message Broker. Reason: j
After stepping through the debugger, I discovered that
Connection.DisposeOf(DataStructure objectId) sends a synchronous call to the
server. This then waits forever since the server has gone down.
Changing it to asynchronous, fixes the problem.
Despite the original comment regarding race conditio
Does anybody have a hacked Net::Stomp they'd be willing to share for contacting
multiple brokers? Either a network, or failover, I'm not terribly picky about
which at the moment.
-Dylan
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 11:17 AM, ttmdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following jar files are required in the CLASSPATH for clients:
>
> $ACTIVEMQ_HOME/activemq-all-.jar
> $ACTIVEMQ_HOME/lib/optional/commons-httpclient-.jar
> $ACTIVEMQ_HOME/lib/optional/xstream-.jar
> $ACTIVEMQ_HOME/lib/op
Yes, if you're using a pure JMS client you can use the http transport w/out
having to deal with REST or AJAX. For example, if you're using the JNDI, you
can place the following brokerURL in your jndi.properties file.
connection.httpConnectionFactory.brokerURL = http://host01:61616
>From your JM
On 3 Mar 2008, at 14:31, Rob Davies wrote:
On 29 Feb 2008, at 22:08, Wladimir Safonov wrote:
Hello,
as I found in the older mailings some people experienced the same
problem as I do in the moment. Seems like problem persisted already
in the earlier versions of the broker (< 4.0), but no solu
I'm interested in configuring ActiveMQ to use the HTTP(S) transport,
but I'm getting a bit cross-eyed regarding REST, HTTP(S) transports
and AJAX.
>From what I understand, if I only have pure JMS clients, I can safely
use the HTTP(S) transports without having to deal with REST or AJAX?
I'm very ne
Ok, I just have entered an improvement suggestion in jira.
rajdavies wrote:
>
>
> Want to raise a jira for an enhancement ?
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/STOMP-message-properties-with-data-type-support-tp15798040s2354p15810794.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Us
Hi Again, all
Solved my own problem, but I've left this in just in case others make the
same mistake!
I should have been using a durable subscriber. As soon as I corrected the
code to the following, ActiveMQ stopped generating the exceptions:
package neil.transactions;
import javax.jms.Connec
Hi All
I'm experimenting with transactions. They work fine for QueueSessions, but
whenever I roll back a transaction on a TopicSession, I get the following
exception:
ERROR Service- Async error occurred:
javax.jms.JMSException: Invalid acknowledgment: MessageAck {command
On 29 Feb 2008, at 22:08, Wladimir Safonov wrote:
Hello,
as I found in the older mailings some people experienced the same
problem as I do in the moment. Seems like problem persisted already
in the earlier versions of the broker (< 4.0), but no solution
approach was found so far. So in m
On 29 Feb 2008, at 15:31, Tom Lynema wrote:
ActiveMQ 5.0.0 is running great on two boxes right up to the point
where I
try to make them master / slave. I've seen this error show up on these
forums before, but none of the fixes work for me.
Here is the line that I added to the config file o
On 29 Feb 2008, at 06:18, DinDon wrote:
Hello guys,
I am new to JMS and ActiveMQ(apache-
activemq-5.1-20080220.151243-27), and I
have been testing ActiveMQ with SpringJMS and Jencks for a week, and
googled
with no luck for the following issues.
- Re-queued messages only being redelivered
On 29/02/2008, Ramit Arora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey James,
> Thanks for the prompt reply. I've already tried Stomp for talking to
> ActiveMQ, & the performance is quite good. I've even modified the Net::Stomp
> module available on CPAN to handle transactions & the master/slave topolog
Here you go
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/activemq/
On 01/03/2008, lanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Where is the maven2 repo for ActiveMQ jars?
>
> I tried:
> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2 and the latest was 4.0
>
> I tried
> http://people.apache.o
On 29 Feb 2008, at 03:10, Qian Su wrote:
Hi,
We are using Activemq version 4.1.1, tcp transport and we'd like the
producer to retry at least once in case of connection timeout to a
broker.
The brokers are configured behind a load balancer.
Does Activemq support retries on the producer end
On 29 Feb 2008, at 01:26, stirlingc wrote:
Hello,
The JavaDoc for ActiveMQSession states that it is a single-threaded
class.
Mr. Strachan re-iterates in this message about ensuring that each
thread has
its own session and producers/consumers:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Help%21-Missing-
On 3 Mar 2008, at 05:36, mjustin wrote:
Dear all
Currently the STOMP connector seems to support only string type
message
properties. So subscription selectors like color = 'blue' AND weight
> 2500
will not work (if the message has been sent using STOMP, the weight
property
will be a st
On 3 Mar 2008, at 07:45, Natit wrote:
Hi, i need to make sure activeMQ can do what i need before i try to
understand how it works.
I need a messagebroker where i can restrict access to topics via
user/password control, is this possible?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com
Eric Rodriguez wrote:
function listenersInit() {
amq.addListener("anyID","topic://my_topic",myHandler.rcvDiff);
}
To make it clear:
"amq.addListener("anyID","topic://my_topic",myHandler.rcvDiff);"
does not need to be inside listenersInit(), that's just how I do it.
1. On the web.xml of your AjaxServlet make sure you have:
org.apache.activemq.brokerURL
tcp://url.to.amqBroker:61616
The URL of the Message Broker to connect to
Now your servlet knows where the broker is.
2. On your HTML/JSP/Javascript subscribe
37 matches
Mail list logo
