Here's my broker configuration
http://activemq.org/config/1.0"; persistent="true">
The AMQ message store store the persistent files in the dataDirectory I
specified, however in my
this has been updated in svn trunk - to set the expiration time
On 14 Mar 2008, at 21:05, patrickjamesbarry wrote:
More info on my issue:
Setup:
Running a producer locally, with TTL set to 3000ms (on my laptop)
Connecting to remote broker via mulitcast
I set my laptop clock back 5 min and tr
Rob,
I did a little investigation and the problem appears to be here:
DemandForwardingBridgeSupport.java:
protected boolean isPermissableDestination(ActiveMQDestination
destination) {
// Are we not bridging temp destinations?
if (destination.isTemporary() &&
!configuration.
question:
After I send message, I recieve it, then email this message using
processMsgInfo() function.
after that, I disconnect the network,then send message,processMsgInfo has
error,because it can not connect email server, the system gives me
information that can not send. but the message i can
Hello, I have the exact same questions, could someone reply?
I would like to add the following: I am trying to use a Master Slave
configuration sitting on top of a SAN in order to provide high availability,
but the fact is that everytime I stop the master and the slave takes over,
the entire syst
Hi. This option does not work with temp queues. Is there another way to
disable this accumulation of
Advisory Objects?
Thx, Michal
jlim wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> You can disable advisory support in your broker config file :
>
> >
>
> Regards,
> Jonas
>
> sparky2708 wrote:
>> My ActiveMQ
The advisory disable does not work when using temp queues.
But if i don't disable it, the advisory objects accumulated until out of
memory.
What should i do to solve this???
Michal Singer wrote:
>
> The snapshot i am using:
> apache-activemq-5.1-20080311.181016-59
>
>
>
> rajdavies wrote:
Can you explain? this problem causes heavy memory leasks. since the Advisor
shows increasing q size.
submitting ack manually does not solve this.
Can you assist me with this?
Thanks ,Michal
rajdavies wrote:
>
> ah - ok - so the problem is with the stats - thx
>
> On 20 Mar 2008, at 11:48, Mi
ah - ok - so the problem is with the stats - thx
On 20 Mar 2008, at 11:48, Michal Singer wrote:
Hi. I am using the latest snapshot: apache-
activemq-5.1-20080311.181016-59
Please note that the messages get stuck when i observe in jconsole
the:
ActiveMQ.Advisory.TempQueue
But if i look spe
Hi. I am using the latest snapshot: apache-activemq-5.1-20080311.181016-59
Please note that the messages get stuck when i observe in jconsole the:
ActiveMQ.Advisory.TempQueue
But if i look specificly on a temp queue (before deleting it - the ack works
- after i updated to CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE )
On 20 Mar 2008, at 07:14, Michal Singer wrote:
Hi.
I an using AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE on a session, but the messages seem to
be stuck
in the queue.
When i update to CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE + ack on each message, it works
fine.
However, if i try the CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE + ack on messages delivered
on
On 19 Mar 2008, at 23:04, Ramit Arora wrote:
Hi All,
I've been testing the performance of ActiveMQ using Perl publishers
(Net::Stomp) & Java subscribers. My producers send persistent
messages & the
subscribers are durable. My test results indicate that the
throughput does
not increase wit
On 19 Mar 2008, at 22:31, realSri wrote:
Version: 5.0
We have a simple setup to test excludedDestinations config ...We are
using
the broker and example producer & consumer from the binary
distribution
(broker instances A & B are on different hosts
Setup:
producer --- A B--- consu
On 19 Mar 2008, at 18:14, Alexe wrote:
I am trying to find out if ActiveCluster is still provided by Apache?
If so is it dependent on any of the (core) ActiveMQ classes?
The group http://archive.activecluster.codehaus.org/user/ has been
inactive
for about a year and the code has not been t
Hi.
I an using AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE on a session, but the messages seem to be stuck
in the queue.
When i update to CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE + ack on each message, it works fine.
However, if i try the CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE + ack on messages delivered on temp
queues, it does not work.
Does any one know why:
1.
15 matches
Mail list logo