Re: NMS ActiveMQ "Dead Lock" on Produce / Consume

2008-05-09 Thread Jim Gomes
Hello, The NMS client ahould work in general. Do you have any specific code samples that can demonstrate this problem. I have written my own test code that will send 1 million messages. I then change the test to either wait for all 1 million messages to be sent before begining to consume them, o

Re: configure a broker filter

2008-05-09 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
got it, BrokerPlugin Filip Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: I'm having a hard time figuring out how to configure a custom broker filter, where in activemq.xml do I configure this? Filip

configure a broker filter

2008-05-09 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
I'm having a hard time figuring out how to configure a custom broker filter, where in activemq.xml do I configure this? Filip

create policyentry for temp topics

2008-05-09 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
is there a way to create a for temporary topics? Filip

Re: Need Help with blocking Producer!

2008-05-09 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
aah, I see, the issue you are running into is a global lock on the session, only one message can be sent at a time on the same session. so if you have multiple threads using the same session, it will send the requests, one at a time you are probably sending messages synchronously, as opposed to

Reference to 61616

2008-05-09 Thread Badri
Hi I am using tcp://localhost:2506 in transportConnector in activemq.xml When i start active mq, I observe the following logs. I am not sure where is it picking tcp://localhost:61616? 2008-05-09 14:41:27,147 INFO BrokerService - ActiveMQ 5.1.0 JMS Mess

Problem with HTTP/REST

2008-05-09 Thread sv75
I'm playng with AMQ 5.1 and HTTP/REST in demo application works strange :( Posting to http://localhost:8161/demo/message/myQueue works fine, but I have problems with GET. It works first time, but then I always get HTTP status 204 and empty body, with lots of pending message in queues. The follow

Regarding release date of 5.2

2008-05-09 Thread Badri
Hi When is the expected release date of 5.2? Thanks Badri -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Regarding-release-date-of-5.2-tp17153005s2354p17153005.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: SMTP Server (Apache James) spooling hints

2008-05-09 Thread Stefano Bagnara
James Strachan ha scritto: 2008/5/9 Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: James Strachan ha scritto: Another option is to use durable topics where a message is written once and all durable topic subscribers just get a kinda pointer to it. I'm not sure I understand how this would work :-( So i

Re: TransportListener question

2008-05-09 Thread jaya_srini
given what I have said below, I am wondering if the following will work The JMS client connects to the broker with the following conenction URI (without async send parameter) failover:(tcp://localhost:61616?wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration=-1) In the code when I create the connection I set the

Re: portfolio web example

2008-05-09 Thread sbruni
I forgot to say thath the Version that I have installed is the last (5.2) After I have installed version 4.1 ad it works anybody knows what's the problem whith 5.2? thanks sbruni wrote: > > Hello! > I've installed activeMQ on windows platform and Market data web example > does not work: > The p

Re: TransportListener question

2008-05-09 Thread jaya_srini
Well, that's the problem. When we use jms.useAsyncSend in the connection URI with the failover transpoert we can't even start the JMS client. It hangs when it's trying to create the connection to the broker. We are using Active-MQ 5.0.0. These are the errors we see in the logs pertaining to Active

Re: SMTP Server (Apache James) spooling hints

2008-05-09 Thread James Strachan
>> I looked at the website and found an error in this page: >> http://activemq.apache.org/camel/spring-xml-extensions.html >> "An error occurred: Connection refused. The system administrator has been >> notified." > Unfortunately its due to the recent svn issues we've had at Apache. > Snippets

Re: SMTP Server (Apache James) spooling hints

2008-05-09 Thread James Strachan
2008/5/9 Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > James Strachan ha scritto: >> >> 2008/5/9 Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>> What does it happen under the hood when I use so many queues? Is the >>> message fully written to disk each time I move it from a queue to another >>> or >>> does

Re: SMTP Server (Apache James) spooling hints

2008-05-09 Thread Stefano Bagnara
James Strachan ha scritto: 2008/5/9 Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: What does it happen under the hood when I use so many queues? Is the message fully written to disk each time I move it from a queue to another or does it simply update a reference when it belongs to the same store? Yeah,

Expired messages

2008-05-09 Thread Steven Van Loon
Hi, Does anybody knows whether and how it is possible to act on expired messages? Thanks! Steven.

Re: SMTP Server (Apache James) spooling hints

2008-05-09 Thread James Strachan
2008/5/9 Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > James Strachan ha scritto: > > > > > 2008/5/8 Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > I'm starting analysis on how to replace our default spool with ActiveMQ > and > > > [...] in James we currently have a single "message store" and we can > >

Re: TransportListener question

2008-05-09 Thread James Strachan
2008/5/9 jaya_srini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Thanks so much for the responses. Can you tell me how I can use Async Sends > with the Failover transport? I tried the jms.useAsyncSend parameter in the > connection URI but that just causes the client to hang. Was the client connected to the broker

Re: TransportListener question

2008-05-09 Thread jaya_srini
Thanks so much for the responses. Can you tell me how I can use Async Sends with the Failover transport? I tried the jms.useAsyncSend parameter in the connection URI but that just causes the client to hang. Is there any other way to do this? If we can use failover with async sends that would be

Re: SMTP Server (Apache James) spooling hints

2008-05-09 Thread Stefano Bagnara
James Strachan ha scritto: 2008/5/8 Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I'm starting analysis on how to replace our default spool with ActiveMQ and [...] in James we currently have a single "message store" and we can "lock on a message" (so no other thread will take it) "retrieve it", "update

Re: TransportListener question

2008-05-09 Thread James Strachan
2008/5/9 jaya_srini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi > > > Is TransportListener only meant to be used with Failover Transport? Yeah - as if you're not using failover, the JMS connection will fail if there is a transport problem; so listening doesn't add much value if your JMS connection is dead :) >