Further experimentation has ensued and here are my results.
I was using the free edition of PC-Tools Firewall Plus on Windows 2003
Server Enterprise, R2.
I figured that if I blocked the JAVA process, that would completely disable
ActiveMQ from talking to other instances. This was not the case, the
gruikman wrote:
>
> I try to embed an activeMQ 5.2.0 broker in a camel-2.0M1 server with
> Spring 2.5.6 and Xbean 3.5 following the activemq tutorials but I get some
> problems...
>
>
>
> I change the
> "http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core/activemq-core-5.2.0.xsd"; into
> "http://activemq.
Hi all,
I have searched through previous posts, and although there are related
posts, people seemed to have had the opposite issue to what I am having so
heres a new post!
It comes down to my master/slave configuration, which works fine, until you
add the authentication ingredient in. I am encou
I assume your assumption is correct, or there's away to embed a broker to
Jboss
and the broker will be considered internal???
I did realize that 2 Brokers were created, actually they appear to override
each other
so only the latter get used from my EJBs & only one is shown in jconsole.
second -
A network bridge has its own prefetch attribute. I think this will override
any url parameter.
It looks like you may have two embedded brokers started here, one from the
ra.xml xml config and one from the "vm://" connection url. Either add
create=false&waitForStart=5000 to the vm://.. url (so that
I've been playing around with ActiveMQ for a while now, and
I'm trying...really hard...to configure it (Like they explain here -
http://activemq.apache.org/what-is-the-prefetch-limit-for.html)
it's all not working, and I've finally understood why, are least I
understand why, but
solving it - I'm
If you still see the leak behavior with the current snapshot, attach your
test case to a new jira issue and we should be able to get to the bottom of
this fairly quickly.
2009/5/18 emersonf
>
> I can check the 5.3 snapshot, but I don't see the relationship between the
> two leaks.
>
> In my scen
This is a bug heads-up for anyone who might be running into the same problem.
(I'm building a simplified example for bug submission, but in the meantime,
to help anyone with similar problems.)
If you:
* Have 2 or more topics with a durable subscriber
* The combination of clientid + subscribernam
I tried keepAlive=true and found something interesting.
I have ActiveMQ in 2 separate Windows VM's.
Basically, I am trying to simulate breaking the connection between the two
ActiveMQ's but each continuing to operate, independently, re-discovering and
re-connecting to each other when the network
I have looked into this further and determined that my previous post was not
complete.
I have now written an extension of the JaasCertificateAuthenticationBroker
so that it only authenticates against an SSL certificate if an SSL transport
is being used. You can browse the class
http://code.goog
oh...I forgot to mention that I use 4.1.2 instead of 5
service.waitUntilStopped();
This function seems not apply for 4.1.2
Jean
rajdavies wrote:
>
>
> On 18 May 2009, at 09:32, JS75 wrote:
>
>>
>> Dear Sir:
>> Here is my scenario - multi-producers and multi-consumers in the same
>> appl
11 matches
Mail list logo
