Does this behaviour change if you use the latest snapshot ?
thanks,
Rob
On 20 Jul 2009, at 03:51, mquestioner wrote:
Hi,
We have a case where a consumer connected through a slow connection
would
slow down the fast consumer. I have already
http://activemq.apache.org/slow-consumers.html and
Hi Dan,
can you try the latest snapshot ? - this looks like you've hit a
resource limit (memory) and/or a bug
thanks,
Rob
On 20 Jul 2009, at 02:42, Dan Tran wrote:
Any one with an answer for this question? from reading activemq
doc and
forum, the lockup is understandable, how it wha
Hi,
We have a case where a consumer connected through a slow connection would
slow down the fast consumer. I have already
http://activemq.apache.org/slow-consumers.html and
http://activemq.apache.org/slow-consumer-handling.html However, there are
specific advises do not seem applicable to our sce
Any one with an answer for this question? from reading activemq doc and
forum, the lockup is understandable, how it what it does not make sense is
that it is still locked up when there only one client left.
Thanks
-dan
Dan Tran wrote:
>
>
> Hello, I have an embedded AMQ with 2 clients usi
Oops, sorry. It is 5.2 with 2 clients: sss and vm. The vm topic client is
the receiving end
-Dan
rajdavies wrote:
>
> some details on version/config may help ;)
>
> On 19 Jul 2009, at 17:01, Dan Tran wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am seeing the following message on stdout
>>
>>
>> Con
some details on version/config may help ;)
On 19 Jul 2009, at 17:01, Dan Tran wrote:
Hello,
I am seeing the following message on stdout
Conn: 172.30.63.41.42867.090709212649 SYSSH200 qasj04
for each StreamMessage received
and 172.30.63.41 is another host that has nothign to do with my
Hello,
I am seeing the following message on stdout
Conn: 172.30.63.41.42867.090709212649 SYSSH200 qasj04
for each StreamMessage received
and 172.30.63.41 is another host that has nothign to do with my testbed.
Any suggestion on this?
Bug thanks ahead
-Dan
--
View this message in c
