On 28 Jul 2009, at 22:56, > wrote:
I've been working on setting up an ActiveMQ 5.2 broker and coding
clients for it for the last few weeks, and now I need to be notified
when somebody logs in. I was hoping I could use the topic
ActiveMQ.Advisory.Connection for that, so I set up a consumer on
I've been working on setting up an ActiveMQ 5.2 broker and coding
clients for it for the last few weeks, and now I need to be notified
when somebody logs in. I was hoping I could use the topic
ActiveMQ.Advisory.Connection for that, so I set up a consumer on it and
tried logging in using another cli
Hi
Recently I configure ActiveMQ with jboss-4.0.2, apparenly all works fine;
however when try sent jms messages from activeMQ queue to message driven
bean, saw in the log file the next warning
15:25:00,119 WARN [Service] Failed to remove connection ConnectionInfo
{commandId = 1, responseRequir
Hello all,
If I configure activeMQ and JMS producer/consumer correctly, are there any
cases where the total order of a queue is violated?
I've seen this page:
http://activemq.apache.org/total-ordering.html
But I came across this post from 2005:
http://www.devwebsphere.com/devwebsphere/2005/06/t
Unfortunately this is a side affect of setting prefetch == 0 - it
works by pulling, so currently only works with receive()
On 28 Jul 2009, at 16:26, magellings wrote:
Hello.
When setting PrefetchSize on the Session to 0 I do not obtain any
messages
when using the Listener event on the Mes
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 08:26 -0700, magellings wrote:
> Hello.
>
> When setting PrefetchSize on the Session to 0 I do not obtain any messages
> when using the Listener event on the MessageConsumer.
>
> If I call Receive on the MessageConsumer to initiate a pull request I can
> obtain messages. Ca
Hello.
When setting PrefetchSize on the Session to 0 I do not obtain any messages
when using the Listener event on the MessageConsumer.
If I call Receive on the MessageConsumer to initiate a pull request I can
obtain messages. Can this work with the Listener event too and maybe I'm
missing some
On 28 Jul 2009, at 14:56, moreno9000 wrote:
Thank you Rob.
With processExpired=false I don't need DLQ, but expired messages
are really deleted from file system only when I "browse" QUEUE_01
with AMQ web console.
Is it possible to eliminate expired messages from file system
without web consol
Thank you Rob.
With processExpired=false I don't need DLQ, but expired messages
are really deleted from file system only when I "browse" QUEUE_01
with AMQ web console.
Is it possible to eliminate expired messages from file system
without web console interaction ?
Moreno
rajdavies wrote:
>
activemq 5.2
rajdavies wrote:
>
> Which version of activemq ?
> On 28 Jul 2009, at 04:00, tracyjoy wrote:
>
>>
>> hi,all:
>> i write a class to test exclusive and priority,but all i set are not
>> work,all messages i producted are shared by customers.this is my code:
>>
>> package com.test;
>>
Thank you Rob.
With processExpired=false I don't need DLQ, but expired messages
are really deleted from file system only when I "browse" QUEUE_01
with AMQ web console.
Is it possible to eliminate expired messages from file system
without web console interaction ?
Moreno
rajdavies wrote:
>
On 28 Jul 2009, at 10:35, moreno9000 wrote:
Hi all,
I have a Producer that sends 250 messages to QUEUE_01.
Messages expire after 30 seconds.
AMQ 5.2 is configured to use Discarding DLQ Broker Plugin.
After 30 seconds I expect messages to be sent to DLQueue
and immediately discarded.
This doe
Hi all,
I have a Producer that sends 250 messages to QUEUE_01.
Messages expire after 30 seconds.
AMQ 5.2 is configured to use Discarding DLQ Broker Plugin.
After 30 seconds I expect messages to be sent to DLQueue
and immediately discarded.
This doesn't happen :-(
More exactly, it happens only wh
You've got to register - but Hiram Chirino and myself will take a bit
of a deep dive into some of ninja stuff in ActiveMQ
If you're interested - here's the link:
https://event.on24.com/eventRegistration/EventLobbyServlet?target=registration.jsp&eventid=154417&sessionid=1&key=E98BDE2DC3E34FAB6
Which version of activemq ?
On 28 Jul 2009, at 04:00, tracyjoy wrote:
hi,all:
i write a class to test exclusive and priority,but all i set are not
work,all messages i producted are shared by customers.this is my code:
package com.test;
import javax.jms.Connection;
import javax.jms.Connection
true, however some smaller files, we would like to send through the MQ for
ensured delivery. The local MQ in the network of brokers could the be the
single point of access to the net (url) instead of the client. Or would in
the case of the blob, the client still require access to the url ?
sem
16 matches
Mail list logo
