Yes, I reckon they should be int. Maybe setPriority should throw an
exception if the input priority is out of range.
Regards,
Andrew Marlow
Internet
clark.obr...@ttmsolutions.com
26/07/2010 17:40
Please respond to
users@activemq.apache.org
To
users@activemq.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: JMSP
We have some administrative task, from time to time. For example, move
database on another physical server etc. It's very easy when write to
database in offloaded with ActiveMQ. We simply turn off the consumer
updating database, move database, switching read to a new database, and
finally, turning
I use the same test case to test the 5.4-SNAPSHOT and the 5.3.3-SNAPSHOT
which both have the duplicate message.
So it maybe a bug in the version 5.3.0 ,5.3.2,5.3.3-SNAPSHOT and
5.4-SNAPSHOT.
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> can you try your test case against a 5.4-SNAPSHOT?
>
> On 26 July 2010 10:47,
This might be a really stupid question but I had to get it cleared.
I create a ActiveMQTextMessage with a simple string.
ActiveMQTextMessage message = new ActiveMQTextMessage();
message.setJMSType("text");
message.setProperty("msgOpCode", "some_Op_code");
message.
I am trying to secure ActiveMQ web console running inside JBoss. What is
the best way of doing it? I have an activemq-web-console.war file that i
have deployed on JBoss. The
queue is running fine with the JBoss start up , but now I want to secure
access to the admin console.
Thanks!
Hammad
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 20:52 +0200, James Casey wrote:
> On 26 July 2010 18:10:16 UTC+2, Neil Pritchard
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using activemq as an exchange and consumer of amqp messages in a
> > distributed system that's written largely in python but has some java
> > components, and a pyt
On 26 July 2010 18:10:16 UTC+2, Neil Pritchard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using activemq as an exchange and consumer of amqp messages in a
> distributed system that's written largely in python but has some java
> components, and a python stomp library for producing messages in the python
> components
ripienaar wrote:
>
> The configs for 5.3.2 is not compatible with 5.4, I'd say that renders 5.4
> useless and I cannot test. Given the state of the documentation, it
> really is an unresolvable issue at this point for me.
>
> The XML config seem to have a fairly random behavior wrt ordering,
ripienaar wrote:
>
>
>
> Gary Tully wrote:
>>
>> sorry, yes, having only half of them duplex will do it. I neglected to
>> ask what version you have, in any event, the issue referenced in the
>> last message (AMQ-2704) was recently resolved so you need to try a
>> 5.4-SNAPSHOT to get the ben
Neil,
Are you aware of the pyactivemq project?
http://code.google.com/p/pyactivemq/
Clark
www.ttmsolutions.com
ActiveMQ reference guide at
http://bit.ly/AMQRefGuide
neilpritchard wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using activemq as an exchange and consumer of amqp messages in a
> distributed syste
Andrew,
Could you satisfy your requirements using advisory messages to listen for
the ActiveMQ.Advisory.MasterBroker notification to keep track of who is the
master broker?
http://activemq.apache.org/advisory-message.html
Clark
www.ttmsolutions.com
ActiveMQ reference guide at
http://bit.ly/A
Andrew,
What is your suggestion that would work in the unsigned java world. I guess
the getPriority and setPriority are required by the spec to be int primitive
types.
Clark
www.ttmsolutions.com
ActiveMQ reference guide at
http://bit.ly/AMQRefGuide
andrew.marlow wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> It l
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> sorry, yes, having only half of them duplex will do it. I neglected to
> ask what version you have, in any event, the issue referenced in the
> last message (AMQ-2704) was recently resolved so you need to try a
> 5.4-SNAPSHOT to get the benefit.
>
I am on 5.3.2, will try
In 5.4, will ajax clients be able to specify per-subscription
filtering rules when subscribing to topics? I don't see any obvious
support for this in the 5.4-SNAPSHOT amq.js code, but maybe I'm
missing it. Would be very helpful to have, and I'd be happy to work
on the JavaScript side of t
sorry, yes, having only half of them duplex will do it. I neglected to
ask what version you have, in any event, the issue referenced in the
last message (AMQ-2704) was recently resolved so you need to try a
5.4-SNAPSHOT to get the benefit.
On 26 July 2010 17:10, ripienaar wrote:
>
>
>
> Gary Tull
Hi,
I'm using activemq as an exchange and consumer of amqp messages in a
distributed system that's written largely in python but has some java
components, and a python stomp library for producing messages in the python
components. ActiveMQ seems to be far superior to anything else that I could
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> you need to turn duplex off or only create the bridges from one
> broker. With your config, where every broker is connected to every
> other broker, duplex=true causes every broker to be connected twice to
> every other broker!
>
> duplex is handy in a hub-spoke topology
you need to turn duplex off or only create the bridges from one
broker. With your config, where every broker is connected to every
other broker, duplex=true causes every broker to be connected twice to
every other broker!
duplex is handy in a hub-spoke topology where the spoke initiates the
forwar
Looks like Ian was working on this back in '06 using STOMP.
http://markmail.org/message/eahnrljkyemqvuag
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com
ActiveMQ reference guide at
http://bit.ly/AMQRefGuide
newphoenix wrote:
>
> Hi
> Is there any J2ME library to connect and start using ActiveMQ as Client
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> ok, so you need to set networTTL=2 for your 3 broker mesh (two hops
> will get to any broker) and enable audit for your topics by explicitly
> setting a topic destination policy.
> See the relevant test case: testAllConnectedBrokerNetworkSingleProducerTTL
> in
> http://sv
YES !
Thank you.
Eric-AWL
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> I guess I should have pointed you at
> http://www.mail-archive.com/users@activemq.apache.org/msg16102.html
> which is more in context.
>
> On 26 July 2010 14:08, Eric-AWL wrote:
>>
>> I don't use shutdownhook nor servicemix at all. This proble
Hello,
It looks to me like ActiveMQ uses a byte to hold the message priority and
treats it as a signed integer. This makes the range -127 to +128.
According to page 34, section 3.4.10 of the JMS spec, priorities are in
the range 0 to 9.
I have also found that IBMs MQSeries, which offers a JMS
I guess I should have pointed you at
http://www.mail-archive.com/users@activemq.apache.org/msg16102.html
which is more in context.
On 26 July 2010 14:08, Eric-AWL wrote:
>
> I don't use shutdownhook nor servicemix at all. This problem appears when my
> program wants to instantiate an embedded bro
I don't use shutdownhook nor servicemix at all. This problem appears when my
program wants to instantiate an embedded broker.
Why don't I experiment this problem on my 5.3.2 own JUNIT tests (AMQ-2775) ?
I imagine that one of the JUnit test permits to validate an external xml
file configuration an
That osgi dependency was inadvertently added in 5.3.2 but it has been
resolved for 5.4 such that osgi is again optional. see:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2574
On 26 July 2010 12:28, Eric-AWL wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I use an activemq.xml file to configure my brokers (embedded or not).
ok, so you need to set networTTL=2 for your 3 broker mesh (two hops
will get to any broker) and enable audit for your topics by explicitly
setting a topic destination policy.
See the relevant test case: testAllConnectedBrokerNetworkSingleProducerTTL in
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/a
Hi there,
In a shared file system master/slave configuation is there an easy way
to find out if a given broker is currently a master or slave?
I tired using activemq-admin query, but it always shows Slave = false.
I know it's possible to work it out from looking at the logs, however
this method
Hi
I use an activemq.xml file to configure my brokers (embedded or not).
When I use 5.3.0.5 fuse version, my CLASSPATH is
/SIB/activemq-release/activemq-all-5.3.0.5-fuse.jar:
/SIB/activemq-release/lib/commons-logging-1.1.jar:
/SIB/activemq-release/lib/optional/xbean-spring-3.6.jar:
/SIB/activem
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> set decreaseNetworkConsumerPriority=true because the topic duplicate
> suppression logic depends on priority to remove a duplicate network
> subscription.
>
Thanks for your reply, have tried this before, tried again now this is the
setup from one of the 3:
can you try your test case against a 5.4-SNAPSHOT?
On 26 July 2010 10:47, honno wrote:
>
> HI,all.
> I use failover transport to connect to brokerA and brokerB.The brokerA and
> brokerB use a networkConnector to connect each other.
>
> But i found the brokerA has a duplicate message when restart
set decreaseNetworkConsumerPriority=true because the topic duplicate
suppression logic depends on priority to remove a duplicate network
subscription.
On 24 July 2010 15:35, ripienaar wrote:
>
> I should also add that with the TTL set to 1 this works in the usual case
> where everything is up, bu
Hi
Is there any J2ME library to connect and start using ActiveMQ as Client
from Mobile Application. If there isn't then how can i connect to activeMQ
from my mobile application using J2ME Please Help needed.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/J2ME-ActiveMQ-Client-tp292650
HI,all.
I use failover transport to connect to brokerA and brokerB.The brokerA and
brokerB use a networkConnector to connect each other.
But i found the brokerA has a duplicate message when restart brokerA or
brokerB.
The test case as follow:
(1)start brokerA,brokerB,start producer and consumer
I don't think so. See attached activemq.xml file.
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> Is the advice from https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2834
> relevant to your use case?
>
> On 23 July 2010 15:32, Pavel Moravec wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> we experience the following problem when using Active-MQ
34 matches
Mail list logo
