I opened a JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3121 and attach a
patch, it is for connection creation optimization.
For the timing issue, I will try to create a case later.
Thanks.
2011/1/6 Gary Tully
> that sounds like a reasonable optimization that can avoid the need to
> create a c
I am trying to debug a little of
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-2923 which I created.
To help, could someone very quickly document how the message-id gets
created? I.e. X-Y-Z what's the X, the Y and the Z?
I'm trying to write a script to reproduce the problem and so far I've failed
so
Howdy,
I'm trying to add ActiveMQ to the client side of my application. I have a
firm ban on anything Spring-related in my applications.
So, I'm trying to figure out what I need to support JMS and to support
connecting to my ActiveMQ broker and nothing else.
When I use activemq-core, I get Spri
In 5.4.2 its kahadb..
Bye,
Norman
2011/1/6 dcheckoway :
>
> Yeah, we're using whatever is the default persistence provider in 5.4.2. I
> opened a fresh ticket for it:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3120
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Gary Tully [via ActiveM
Yeah, we're using whatever is the default persistence provider in 5.4.2. I
opened a fresh ticket for it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3120
Thanks,
Dan
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Gary Tully [via ActiveMQ] <
ml-node+3177622-1458695149-140...@n4.nabble.com
> wrote:
> AMQ-3051
Hello Dejan,
> but you cannot have a slave broker in an active Tomcat instance.
thanks. That is what was troubling me. An identical config with standalone
brokers worked.
Is there any specific reason why embedded brokers and master/slave are not
orthogonal? Did I miss this somewhere in the do
AMQ-3051 is using the older AMQPersistenceAdapter and NFS, so it seems
to be different from your use case?
On 6 January 2011 15:14, dcheckoway wrote:
>
> Gary,
>
> Thanks for the reply and advice. I'll definitely try disabling
> concurrentStoreAndDispatchQueues to see if that helps, and I'll set
Gary,
Thanks for the reply and advice. I'll definitely try disabling
concurrentStoreAndDispatchQueues to see if that helps, and I'll set up an IO
exception handler.
Unfortunately the issue can't reliably be reproduced. We have a cluster of
servers all running their own local embedded queue, an
One thought, there may be an issue with the default setting of true
for concurrentStoreAndDispatchQueues that is causing the index to be
out of sync with the store.
It is worth trying to disable that, use:
How often is this occurring, to really get to the bottom of this a
test case will be
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 14:41 +0100, Martin Nicolay wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, Timothy Bish wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 11:10 +0100, Martin Nicolay wrote:
> > > I want to use activemq-cpp-library asynchronously in a single-threaded
> > > application.
> [...]
> > The OpenWire-cpp client is a d
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011, Timothy Bish wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 11:10 +0100, Martin Nicolay wrote:
> > I want to use activemq-cpp-library asynchronously in a single-threaded
> > application.
[...]
> The OpenWire-cpp client is a different beast from ActiveMQ-CPP, so the
> documentation there doesn'
I'm using an embedded broker (version 5.4.2) with persistence enabled. We're
pumping hundreds of millions of messages per day through this thing. Every
once in a while, all of a sudden the KahaDB directory starts growing
uncontrollably, and these errors start spewing out in the log over and
over
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 11:10 +0100, Martin Nicolay wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I want to use activemq-cpp-library asynchronously in a single-threaded
> application.
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/openwire-cpp-client.html says:
> The socket to the ActiveMQ broker is to be exposed to the
> applic
that sounds like a reasonable optimization that can avoid the need to
create a connection if the RA is deployed in local transaction only
mode (ie: uses the regular non xa connection factory)
One thought, it may be a good idea to produce a simple junit test case
that demonstrates the timing issue w
Hi.
I want to use activemq-cpp-library asynchronously in a single-threaded
application.
http://activemq.apache.org/openwire-cpp-client.html says:
The socket to the ActiveMQ broker is to be exposed to the
application by the transport layer, and data received on it is to
You mean by default, ActiveMQ is already using KahaDB?
Using the activemq.xml that I posted earlier, the logs show this:
2011-01-06 15:47:48,873 INFO BrokerService:462 - Using Persistence
Adapter: AMQPersistenceAdapter(/tmp/dev/devbroker)
2011-01-06 15:47:48,882 INFO AMQPersistenceAdapter:177
16 matches
Mail list logo
