I'm trying to verify that my multicast cluster is working properly: clients
on any node should receive msgs sent to any other node.
Using 5.10, on Ubuntu
In the past I have successfully created a network of brokers using a static
list of urls. I could then run a "subscriber" client that connecte
I'd look at using camel routes embedded in activemq to control this as
you can retrieve queue depths to determine the processing approach.
Take a look at
http://rajdavies.blogspot.com.au/2013/09/apache-camel-broker-component-for.html
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Niranjan Rao wrote:
> Greet
If there is a blocked thread somehow, your stack trace didn't indicate any
Jetty thread issues.
It did indicate some problems with the mysql connection, however.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Manu wrote:
> Any clue ?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Manu wrote:
>
> > No that large :
There might be a timeout problem when shutting down some Camel routes which
work with ActiveMQ:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-ActiveMQ-shutdown-timeout-problem-td5753919.html.
What do you think?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Another-NegativeAr
Any clue ?
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Manu wrote:
> No that large : 360 messages of average size of less than 1Ko.
> I did not check the heap at the time of the event. I'll take a look at
> those next time ...
>
> But do you think Jetty can have keep ActiveMq from shutting down ?
>
>
>
>
