Re: Unmatched acknowledge: MessageAck (start of ack) in XA transaction initiated by Oracle Service Bus

2017-02-09 Thread aphor
Did you get solution? I got similar issue and post at http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Messages-stuck-in-queue-after-failover-td4719934.html -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Unmatched-acknowledge-MessageAck-start-of-ack-in-XA-transaction-initiated-by-O

Re: ARTEMIS: bad-performance behaviour after 7-10 days of usage

2017-02-09 Thread Martyn Taylor
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Francesco PADOVANI < francesco.padov...@bticino.it> wrote: > Hi Martyn, > > Thanks a lot for this! > > It could save us just in time... I hope so. > > As soon as I can, I'll try to build artemis from your last commit and make > some tests. > I've created a snapsho

Re: ARTEMIS: bad-performance behaviour after 7-10 days of usage

2017-02-09 Thread Francesco PADOVANI
Hi Martyn, Thanks a lot for this! It could save us just in time... As soon as I can, I'll try to build artemis from your last commit and make some tests. I'll give you a feedback. Francesco From: Martyn Taylor Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 1:22:52 PM To

Re: Artems: ParallelGC vs CMS

2017-02-09 Thread Tim Bain
Did Old Gen continually increase *after* performing full GCs? That is, was the Old Gen usage after full GC #N always greater than the Old Gen usage after full GC #N+1? If not, you were concerned about something that doesn't matter. It's OK for Old Gen to grow; that's why we have a garbage collecto

Re: ARTEMIS: bad-performance behaviour after 7-10 days of usage

2017-02-09 Thread Martyn Taylor
Francesco, I think I've identified the cause of this problem. There were two issues which are now fixed as part of: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1002 I'll get these fixes cherry-picked onto Artemis 1.x stream. I plan on doing a 1.5.3 (with these changes included) within the n