I've never observed the JMX-related memory issues you described in the
brokers I've worked with (though they were all older: 5.10.x and before).
Maybe a bug was introduced in a recent version, or maybe something during
your testing looked more problematic than it actually was.
Your CPU usage doesn
Your requirement that messages be routed in the absence of
consumers/subscriptions (presumably that means you want the messages to
stick around till a consumer shows up for them) drives you to needing to
use queues, and selectors on queues could only allow you to route the
original message to a sin
We use ActiveMQ 5, not Artemis, with Docker with large numbers of
brokers. Not swarm but Rancher and Cattle, and we are in process of
moving, again not to swarm but to Kubernetes.
It's running in Karaf (not Tomcat) using blueprints (not spring) and we
have karaf ConfigAdmin bundles that make t
When you say "across the pond" what exactly are you referring to? Also, when
you say you're going to run two 2-node clusters wouldn't that just be a 4-node
cluster?
Justin
- Original Message -
From: "mtod"
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 4:26:10 PM
Subject:
Thanks everyone for the responses that helps.
For the support model we have been running ActiveMQ in production for 4
years I'm very happy with the performance. I know there are several 3rd
parties that if I need to add a support model they would be happy to sign a
contract. :)
I plan on setting
For what it's worth, Artemis is based on HornetQ which has been deployed in
production for years by users of JBoss AS, Wildfly, and Red Hat JBoss
Enterprise Application Platform.
Substantial improvements have been made to the code-base since the donation to
Apache including (among others) Open
Although I must emphasize the Apache license*.
If you need extra warranties you probably need a company supporting you **
* https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html
7. Disclaimer of Warranty. Unless required by applicable law or agreed to
in writing, Licensor provides the Work (and each
I know of a few large deployments using 1.5.4.
I have myself done a lot of testing using production similar (actually
worse than production) testcases.
You have to actually as with any new system check your configurations and
do your testing. But I wouldn't release something under Apache where
Is Artemis production ready?
I have ActiveMQ 5.10 in production today but our infrastructure is moving to
AWS and global ( US and Europe).
I would like to upgrade from a single on prem cluster to a 2 failover
cluster model with a network connector across the pond.
before I spend all the cycles I
Thanks,
So the producer needs to set a destination.
That's OK, I guess it can be a 'special' destination, from which the broker
will perform routing to the appropriately determined destinations.
PS the destinations won't be known in advance - they could be constructed by
concatenating various pa
I haven't done it specifically for docker swarm, but you could take a look
and adapt my approach for Kubernetes:
https://github.com/vromero/charts/tree/gh-pages/activemq-artemis
2017-04-27 6:21 GMT-07:00 Lachezar Dobrev :
> Hello all.
> I'm just beginning with Docker Swarm and am wondering t
Hello, I am working with the ActiveMQ Resource Adapter, hooking it into
Wildfly 10. I am trying to configure it properly, but I do not know how to
change the default ServerURL. The link here:
http://activemq.apache.org/resource-adapter-properties.html, states that it
defaults to localhost, but I wa
How fast the messages get purged depend on many things such as how large
the messages are, if they are non-persistent, and if there is contention on
the Queue, and of course how fast your hardware is. The purge operation
works by paging in batches of messages at a time so if it has to go to disk
ve
On 04/28/2017 10:46 AM, Vince Cole wrote:
Is it possible for a producer to send a message to ActiveMQ, with an
unspecified destination?
The intention is that ActiveMQ will (via a plugin) inspect the message
(content, headers and/or properties) and according to some business rules,
it will decide
Is it possible for a producer to send a message to ActiveMQ, with an
unspecified destination?
The intention is that ActiveMQ will (via a plugin) inspect the message
(content, headers and/or properties) and according to some business rules,
it will decide which destination(s) the message must be s
Hi,
I have a lot of messages in some DLQs. These are in the order of 10
thousand / DLQ! Before I go and delete these from my production environment
I wanted to know if theres anything I need to consider before I do it??? ie
performance. As you can imagine I dont want to hit the purge button a
No, I don't think you've misunderstood anything.
I'd use embedded Camel routes on the test broker to forward messages
between the appropriate queues on the two brokers. This obviously means
that you have to have different configurations on the two brokers, but I
think that's unavoidable and the sc
I have a specific question at the end of this, but I've read a lot of
documentation and FAQs and I am posting to ask if there is something I've
missed, or if my understanding is wrong. So I have to summarise what I think
I've understood, and explain the problem -- I'll keep it as short as I can,
bu
18 matches
Mail list logo
